The PP seems to think it's a problem if MCPS doesn't use the word "close," even if they meet all of the procedural requirements for a closure. At least, they claim to believe that. It is hard to know when clearly so many of their posts are disingenuous. |
It shouldn't. MCPS shouldn't be playing favorites. |
You give MCPS too much credit and the students no credit for their good grades. Shame on you. |
Notice has been provided of a school closure? Please cite to this in an official MCPS communication. |
They always have. Look at the course and activity offerings at the various MS and HS. There are huge disparities in the offerings. |
I've been getting emails. You haven't? You're hung up on the "closure" word. Even if it was a closure, MCPS wouldn't have to use your desired word. |
I said "shouldn't", not "doesn't". |
Ok, MCPS is removing Blair and other good magnet programs. No more disparities. |
Quite the opposite. The high test scores at Wootton aren't due to MCPS. They're due to the students that have selected for that boundary. Those students would test well at any school. |
These students will just move. Their parents won’t just sit passively |
Grades are just one part of it, the opportunities are an issue. |
They aren't removing it, they are adding more magnets to give more kids opportunities. That's a good thing. |
That's fine. No one is going to have an issue with that. |
That's fine. What's wrong with that? |
Here we go again. When is a magnet no longer a magnet? |