Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
The gun was legal so you sound stupid when you use it to make a point. Be better. |
Anonymous
The problem is everything you just said is made up liberal fan fiction bullshit. It would be an egregious abuse of power for the DOJ to get involved in this case after the jury acquitted. Anyone who actually watched any of this trial knows that the jury reached the right verdict. You lefties got away with insanity during the Trump years, and that’s unfortunate. But, good news is that sane people are sick of your BS at this point. |
Anonymous
This. He’s a coward. He can’t fight like a man so he carried a gun. He’s a little beyotch. |
Anonymous
Oh, so now you libs are turning to your tried and true hypocritical strategy of trying to emasculate men you dislike. |
Anonymous
It’s like they don’t even know what’s coming out of their mouths anymore. |
Anonymous
Posts like this are why I had to leave DCUM politics section. The intellectual level of discourse here is too often just utterly non-existent. Post like the above belong on Twitter. Maybe it's just emotional stories like this that bring out the stupidest (on both sides) in people. IDK. |
Anonymous
| I’m sure all you internet tough guys would tell your 17 year old son to just “use your fists” if he was being chased by a 36 year old child rapist who was in prison for 14 years, if your son had a gun on him. Please… |
Anonymous
My kid doesn't have an AR 15. So none of that is anything to worry about. |
Anonymous
But I’m sure if he had one you’d scold him for not using it against a serial child rapist who served 14 years in prison and reprimand your child for not going toe to toe with a ex con pedophile. Please. |
Anonymous
You would would have to either be a horrible lawyer or blindly biased to be a lawyer and think the verdict was wrong. As a lawyer, I can tell you think was actually an insanely obvious outcome. The only thing that made the outcome questionable was all the politics surrounding it and not knowing if the jury would do the right thing |
Anonymous
Wow, I’m embarrassed for you to speak so confidentially about things you are so wrong about. Your lack of knowledge about the facts is stark. - didn’t cross state lines - 0 evidence of intent to murder - not an illegal gun and not illegal for him to have it - don’t even know what the heck you are talking about re civil rights |
Anonymous
The problem is that this outcome means that anyone can go to some random town, wave an AR-15 around at people and provoke them, and then shoot and kill them when they come after you. And get off for it. This is NOT a good outcome for America. It only escalates us toward even more violence and bloodshed, in case you haven't figured that out yet. And what happens when the extreme left starts using this same tactic? |
Anonymous
FACT: Rittenhouse DID cross state lines FACT: Rittenhouse was on video a few days prior saying he wished he had his AR while safely watching some protesters from afar with no immediate threat to him (intent to kill). But of course this was a sham of a trial. |
Anonymous
As an attorney, I would just love it if someone actually chimed in and explained the legal significance of the whole "crossing a state line" mantra that Rittenhouse's detractors continue to spout. FFS, what does that have anything to do with any element of any offense with which he was charged? This is America. People cross state lines all the time. I have been in DC, Maryland, and Virginia all within the last 24 hours. |
Anonymous
Kyle Rittenhouse was raised in a home with an Alcoholic father- later a broken home= low self esteem, pent up rage and looking for someone to act out on Its a well known fact that the most criminals in this country were raised in homes with substance abuse/ broken homes, single parents His mom has no education |