Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully Justice Dept gets involved. The President’s language of “angry and concerned” should be enough for them to start moving on Rittenhouse.

DOJ will not get involved because there is no cause for them to do so. And the reaction to this case and today's verdict from leaders of the political left is driving me further away from the Democratic party. I supported Biden with my vote and my dollars during his campaign. But today's stubborn reaction from him guarantees that I will not be voting for him in the future. Shameful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If he was black he would have been found guilty. No doubt in my mind - signed, a white person

Agreed--signed another white person

+1. Latina

Maybe? Signed another human.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully Justice Dept gets involved. The President’s language of “angry and concerned” should be enough for them to start moving on Rittenhouse.

I wouldn't be surprised if this rogue Justice Dept. did get involved.
But, they have no reason to. That won't stop them though. The current Justice Dept. has a penchant for stepping into things they have no reason to. Thanks to Garland.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the jury made the right call. The precedent this sets wasn't the jury's job.

Now it's time for the real work. States need to get rid of open carry and ban concealed carry in public places. Or any physical threat will be used to justify gun violence.

Watched a vid where an Asian girl got beat to hell by a bunch of black teens and another with a Hijab on public transportation. She wasn’t armed so she politely just took the beating

And no one died. That’s how it should be.

Your comment promotes anti-Asian violence.

Really? That’s the best youve got?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully Justice Dept gets involved. The President’s language of “angry and concerned” should be enough for them to start moving on Rittenhouse.

there is no basis for them to get involved. What is the violation?

The Chief Executive believes a gross miscarriage of justice occurred (as those of us with more than a modicum of intelligence do). If I’m Garland and my boss uses that language, I’m moving. Surely if Ritterhouse and his supporters believe he did nothing wrong they’d welcome the investigation!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully Justice Dept gets involved. The President’s language of “angry and concerned” should be enough for them to start moving on Rittenhouse.

there is no basis for them to get involved. What is the violation?

Uh, let’s see…. Murder? Crossing state lines with intent to commit murder? Violating the civil rights of protesters? Possession of an illegal gun?

Should I go on or is that enough to get you to S T F U ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully Justice Dept gets involved. The President’s language of “angry and concerned” should be enough for them to start moving on Rittenhouse.

there is no basis for them to get involved. What is the violation?

Uh, let’s see…. Murder? Crossing state lines with intent to commit murder? Violating the civil rights of protesters? Possession of an illegal gun?

Should I go on or is that enough to get you to S T F U ?

All these issues were just adjudicated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully Justice Dept gets involved. The President’s language of “angry and concerned” should be enough for them to start moving on Rittenhouse.

there is no basis for them to get involved. What is the violation?

The Chief Executive believes a gross miscarriage of justice occurred (as those of us with more than a modicum of intelligence do). If I’m Garland and my boss uses that language, I’m moving. Surely if Ritterhouse and his supporters believe he did nothing wrong they’d welcome the investigation!

Contrary to what Obama/Holder believed...... the AG is not the president's wingman.
Just because Biden makes a comment, it doesn't make it meaningful. Or, legally accurate.

(And, it is a good thing you are not the AG.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully Justice Dept gets involved. The President’s language of “angry and concerned” should be enough for them to start moving on Rittenhouse.

there is no basis for them to get involved. What is the violation?

Uh, let’s see…. Murder? Crossing state lines with intent to commit murder? Violating the civil rights of protesters? Possession of an illegal gun?

Should I go on or is that enough to get you to S T F U ?

We found the village idiot.

[Anonymous]

Kyle sobbed.

Men who cry are babies and sissy lady-boys!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the jury made the right call. The precedent this sets wasn't the jury's job.

Now it's time for the real work. States need to get rid of open carry and ban concealed carry in public places. Or any physical threat will be used to justify gun violence.

Watched a vid where an Asian girl got beat to hell by a bunch of black teens and another with a Hijab on public transportation. She wasn’t armed so she politely just took the beating

And no one died. That’s how it should be.

And no one seems to care. The threads about this got deleted, why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully Justice Dept gets involved. The President’s language of “angry and concerned” should be enough for them to start moving on Rittenhouse.

there is no basis for them to get involved. What is the violation?

Uh, let’s see…. Murder? Crossing state lines with intent to commit murder? Violating the civil rights of protesters? Possession of an illegal gun?

Should I go on or is that enough to get you to S T F U ?

Uh, let's see......HE DID NONE OF THOSE THINGS!!!! Try again, Skippy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I take comfort that Zimmerman’s life fell apart. Rittenhouse will follow in the same footprints. His claim to fame is killing two people. His name is tainted forever.

Matt Gaetz is going to hire him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If you run at a person who has a gun, they are allowed to shoot you dead because they feel their life is at endangered.

America 2021.

Exactly. No need to settle things with fists like men. No more just taking your lumps and moving on. Now it’s all about having a high action caliber weapon so you don’t have to fight like a man. Pathetic little smalldick losers. It sickens me.

Yep. Pathetic. And they think they are so manly with their guns

Real men use their fists. They don’t have to rely on a battlefield gun.

Yes but Kyle was a boy and was defending himself against a serial child rapist who served 10 years in state prison and was recently arrested for beating his wife. You wouldn’t to toe to toe with a hardened sociopath like Rosenbaum, why should a 17 year old boy who has other options?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kyle sobbed.

Men who cry are babies and sissy lady-boys!

He may have been crying thinking about how rich he’s going to be after suing many national media outlets for calling him a white supremacist without evidence. Nick Sandman’s settlements total nine figures.