Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:New, fourth allegation.....sexual assault in 1988.

Kavanaugh is TOAST!


Where do you see that?


Google Kavanaugh and look at most recent news items. A new woman has come forward about an incident that happened in 1998.
Anonymous
Should each of the accusers, the three women, get full on FBI investigations, starting from age twelve?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Since Ford is afraid to fly, did she begin her cross-country drive 5 days ago?


She also had her polygraph done in MD on Aug. 7. Wondering if she flew or drive. I know she was vacationing on the east coast during this time, according to the letter she gave to Feinstein.


Finally, someone is asking the important questions.
/s

Once a person is caught telling one lie, it throws their entire testimony into question. Why did she say she was afraid to fly? Just an excuse to not have tot testify under oath?

Exactly. Yet she easily flew out here for the pussy march.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Ford's statement is powerful.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408614-read-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-fords-prepared-remarks-for-thursday

Apart from the assault itself, these last couple of weeks have been the hardest of my life. I have had to relive my trauma in front of the entire world, and have seen my life picked apart by people on television, in the media, and in this body who have never met me or spoken with me. I have been accused of acting out of partisan political motives. Those who say that do not know me. I am a fiercely independent person and I am no one’s pawn. My motivation in coming forward was to provide the facts
about how Mr. Kavanaugh’s actions have damaged my life, so that you can take that into serious consideration as you make your decision about how to proceed. It is not my responsibility to determine whether Mr. Kavanaugh deserves to sit on the Supreme Court. My responsibility is to tell the truth.


very effective, carefully crafted wording


This woman sounds amazing. Thank you for coming forward and shedding light on this creep.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Since Ford is afraid to fly, did she begin her cross-country drive 5 days ago?


She also had her polygraph done in MD on Aug. 7. Wondering if she flew or drive. I know she was vacationing on the east coast during this time, according to the letter she gave to Feinstein.


Finally, someone is asking the important questions.
/s

Once a person is caught telling one lie, it throws their entire testimony into question. Why did she say she was afraid to fly? Just an excuse to not have tot testify under oath?

Exactly. Yet she easily flew out here for the pussy march.


How do you know she didn't drive?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


And this woman is alleging she committed statutory rape? Those boys were younger than 18 at the time, and she was a few years older.


Let's charge her! Statutory rape is a crime of strict liability, after all. I'm sure it applies to someone who has been drugged.
Anonymous
From the Post. Sounds like GP classmates have closed ranks to protect Kavanaugh. Still willing to make supportive statements anonymously:

At least one of Kavanagh’s classmates scoffed at the notion that Swetnick would have been a regular at parties with Georgetown Prep students.

“Never heard of her,” said the person, who declined to be named because members of the class have agreed not to speak on the record to reporters. “I don’t remember anyone from Prep hanging out with public school girls, especially from Gaithersburg.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/who-is-julie-swetnick-the-third-kavanaugh-accuser/2018/09/26/91e16ed8-c1bc-11e8-97a5-ab1e46bb3bc7_story.html?utm_term=.504c6923bcb3
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
From her statement it seems they were “house parties” but were not necessarily HS parties (unclear), and that she went until she herself became a victim.


No. She said she was raped in '82 but went to parties '82-'83.


So young people should never go to a party again if something bad happens? I mean, I can understand not wanting to, but that's an individual decision. I fell off a balcony during Beach Week and broke my ankle, but that didn't stop me from going back the next year for more stupid partying.


Falling off a balcony was something you did to yourself. That is totally different. If you saw women getting forced to drink tainted punch and boys were lining up to take turns raping them, would you really go to a party where those boys were going to be? If you didn't know, and they showed up, would you really stay and party with them? Would you partake of that rapey punch?

I mean, damn. My son went to a HS party last year and some guy showed some people he had a gun. He and his friends left the party. Fast forward to this year. They go to a party and lo and behold, that guy shows up. Guess what they did? They hauled ass out of the party. And that dude wasn't shooting anybody with it.


Did you call the cops on this kid? Or, do you not learn from history either?

Not reporting criminal activity is might suspicious. Unless you're an accomplice?


Don't know the name of the teen with the gun. And the rest of my post? Nothing to say about that?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
From her statement it seems they were “house parties” but were not necessarily HS parties (unclear), and that she went until she herself became a victim.


No. She said she was raped in '82 but went to parties '82-'83.


So young people should never go to a party again if something bad happens? I mean, I can understand not wanting to, but that's an individual decision. I fell off a balcony during Beach Week and broke my ankle, but that didn't stop me from going back the next year for more stupid partying.


Falling off a balcony was something you did to yourself. That is totally different. If you saw women getting forced to drink tainted punch and boys were lining up to take turns raping them, would you really go to a party where those boys were going to be? If you didn't know, and they showed up, would you really stay and party with them? Would you partake of that rapey punch?

I mean, damn. My son went to a HS party last year and some guy showed some people he had a gun. He and his friends left the party. Fast forward to this year. They go to a party and lo and behold, that guy shows up. Guess what they did? They hauled ass out of the party. And that dude wasn't shooting anybody with it.


Did you call the cops on this kid? Or, do you not learn from history either?

Not reporting criminal activity is might suspicious. Unless you're an accomplice?


Don't know the name of the teen with the gun. And the rest of my post? Nothing to say about that?


So if you don’t know the name of rapists, do you not report?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:New, fourth allegation.....sexual assault in 1988.

Kavanaugh is TOAST!


Where do you see that?


Google Kavanaugh and look at most recent news items. A new woman has come forward about an incident that happened in 1998.


I still believe there are more.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Since Ford is afraid to fly, did she begin her cross-country drive 5 days ago?


She also had her polygraph done in MD on Aug. 7. Wondering if she flew or drive. I know she was vacationing on the east coast during this time, according to the letter she gave to Feinstein.


Finally, someone is asking the important questions.
/s

Once a person is caught telling one lie, it throws their entire testimony into question. Why did she say she was afraid to fly? Just an excuse to not have tot testify under oath?

Exactly. Yet she easily flew out here for the pussy march.


How do you know she didn't drive?

Many, many people still fly despite having a fear of flying. Why continue this narrative?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
From her statement it seems they were “house parties” but were not necessarily HS parties (unclear), and that she went until she herself became a victim.


No. She said she was raped in '82 but went to parties '82-'83.


So young people should never go to a party again if something bad happens? I mean, I can understand not wanting to, but that's an individual decision. I fell off a balcony during Beach Week and broke my ankle, but that didn't stop me from going back the next year for more stupid partying.


Falling off a balcony was something you did to yourself. That is totally different. If you saw women getting forced to drink tainted punch and boys were lining up to take turns raping them, would you really go to a party where those boys were going to be? If you didn't know, and they showed up, would you really stay and party with them? Would you partake of that rapey punch?

I mean, damn. My son went to a HS party last year and some guy showed some people he had a gun. He and his friends left the party. Fast forward to this year. They go to a party and lo and behold, that guy shows up. Guess what they did? They hauled ass out of the party. And that dude wasn't shooting anybody with it.


Did you call the cops on this kid? Or, do you not learn from history either?

Not reporting criminal activity is might suspicious. Unless you're an accomplice?


Don't know the name of the teen with the gun. And the rest of my post? Nothing to say about that?


That doesn't matter. What type of parent are you?? This is why kids in this area have issues, because of parents like you. Figure it out and call the cops/school. You're a hypocrite.
Anonymous
I hope that parents do not allow kavanaugh to coach their daughters anymore. It is not safe. He is not safe.


Good point, unless he legally changes his name, by deed poll, to Judge Rapey McKavanaugh. Then, maybe, he can coach again.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Should each of the accusers, the three women, get full on FBI investigations, starting from age twelve?


Yes, when each is nominated for a lifetime position on the US Supreme Court and faces credible accusations involving potentially criminal conduct alleged to have been committed when the nominee was 12.
Anonymous
Brett was obviously a privileged, punk-ass white boy who carefully chose his victims.....not the A-list cheerleaders, but instead wading in shallow waters for the eager-beaver beta girls and public school fodder.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: