Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still a hell of a lot of disinformation out there.....

The mainstream media is hopelessly biased to the left.

They are literally fake news. If this verdict makes you angry and confused, you’ve been horribly mislead by what is essentially propaganda: MSNBC, CNN, NPR.

They are not telling you the truth.

Were the men who were shot not black? Sorry, I haven't been following the story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I checked out after the kid ugly cried on the stand. Does anyone believe the vetted jurors had no knowledge that Rosenbaum spent roughly 15 years in prison for sexually abusing five pre-teen boys in 2002, was indicted on 11 counts of child molestation, and eventually pleaded guilty to two amended counts of sexual conduct with a minor? Obviously wasn't admitted in court docs, but they had to know. Not sobbing for the victims at all. Not overjoyed for Rittenhouse either. Clearly a premeditated "looking for trouble" kid.

So he deserved to die? Is that what you're saying?

NP. Yes. He murdered two people. He had no reason to be there as he just appointed himself judge, jury, and executioner. He has a target on his back. H
deserves whatever he gets. The judge should be defrocked or whatever they do to insane judges!

I think what the PP was actually saying is that the jury was biased. Did you catch how the defense was allowed to slip in the mental health history of one of the murdered and the Judge did NOTHING.

The Judge should be removed from the bench - but the prosecutor knew his reputation ( so many defense Attys request anyone BUT Schroeder that the county had to bring in another part time judge to hear cases that were petitioned out of his court) - so IDK why he didn't ask for a change of venue

To me, the tragedy of this case as well as the Aubrey case is how people's perceptions/ assumptions of one another lead them to act like an enraged vigilante( its not just racism as. in Kenosha both killer and victimes were white )

Brandishing a gun is like a PTSD reaction by someone who has already decided that his target has no human value or is certainly not equal to him.

THis Rittenhouse is a video game addict and wanna be, looking for something to make him feel like a man. If he were in Iraq, he'd be the guy who snaps and mows down a whole village of women and children and then claims that he was under attack.

We have waaaaay to many people in our society who are mentally deficient like this. I can't imagine anyone feeling safe in a work place with Kyle Rittenhouse. Would you wantto enter a restaurant where he is also seated, a movie theatre, a public bus ? What if the guy feels threatened by someone again or can't manage his temper again and just snaps again and starts firing.

I think he is a threat to the public safety and that is why people like him should be kept in jail

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still a hell of a lot of disinformation out there.....

The mainstream media is hopelessly biased to the left.

They are literally fake news. If this verdict makes you angry and confused, you’ve been horribly mislead by what is essentially propaganda: MSNBC, CNN, NPR.

They are not telling you the truth.

Were the men who were shot not black? Sorry, I haven't been following the story.

They were all white.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: If you run at a person who has a gun, they are allowed to shoot you dead because they feel their life is at endangered.

America 2021.

Exactly. No need to settle things with fists like men. No more just taking your lumps and moving on. Now it’s all about having a high action caliber weapon so you don’t have to fight like a man. Pathetic little smalldick losers. It sickens me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wasn't really following the story, but why was this kid there toting what looks to be a semiautomatic?

To protect a car lot from these rioters who wanted to burn the cars. Because he interfered with that, they went after Rittenhouse and tried to kill him.

Was he under 18 at the time? Why was a minor carrying a semiautomatic rifle and why was he trying to protect the car lot? Did his family own it? That's crazy that a 17 yr old was there with a semiautomatic.

It’s legal in Wisconsin

If he didn’t have it he would be dead trying to protect the car lot from being destroyed

The owner of the lot said under oath that he DID NOT ask cry baby Kyle to protect his property. Cry baby Kyle went there looking for trouble.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If you run at a person who has a gun, they are allowed to shoot you dead because they feel their life is at endangered.

America 2021.

Exactly. No need to settle things with fists like men. No more just taking your lumps and moving on. Now it’s all about having a high action caliber weapon so you don’t have to fight like a man. Pathetic little smalldick losers. It sickens me.

Yep. Pathetic. And they think they are so manly with their guns

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Kyle was in the wrong. He had no business being in the middle of that riot. He provoked people, waved his gun at them, escalated and it resulted in him shooting two people and injuring another.

One should not be allowed "self defense" claims when one is the person who provoked the fight in the first place. That is then just an excuse to murder.

I literally don’t understand people like you. I hope you don’t own private property. I hope that if a armed person comes to your house you have no problem being killed. Your like a Quaker. You think other people should do your dirty work while getting to virtue signal.

Sure, if it was my son, I wouldn’t want him there for HIS SAFETY. Yet, I also understand that someone needed to stand up to the mob and the mob attacked him.

Why are women so against Kyle? We are more vulnerable then men. Why does my sex seem to think it’s okay to let a mob burn down a town and potentially hurt innocent bystanders. Do you think America in 2021 is so awful that everything needs to be burned down to the ground.

I don’t get the reasoning. It strikes me as naive.

Was Kyle in his home at the time? Private Property? Did the "mob" kill anyone?

The mob killed at least 19 people we know of, and did more than 1 billion dollars in damage during BLM protests over a single summer, but it took them more than one night.

Cite?

Any of that?

No, you can’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wasn't really following the story, but why was this kid there toting what looks to be a semiautomatic?

To protect a car lot from these rioters who wanted to burn the cars. Because he interfered with that, they went after Rittenhouse and tried to kill him.

Was he under 18 at the time? Why was a minor carrying a semiautomatic rifle and why was he trying to protect the car lot? Did his family own it? That's crazy that a 17 yr old was there with a semiautomatic.

It’s legal in Wisconsin

If he didn’t have it he would be dead trying to protect the car lot from being destroyed

The owner of the lot said under oath that he DID NOT ask cry baby Kyle to protect his property. Cry baby Kyle went there looking for trouble.

Hey dummy, they asked one of Kyle’s friends so he tagged along. Got it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: If you run at a person who has a gun, they are allowed to shoot you dead because they feel their life is at endangered.

America 2021.

Exactly. No need to settle things with fists like men. No more just taking your lumps and moving on. Now it’s all about having a high action caliber weapon so you don’t have to fight like a man. Pathetic little smalldick losers. It sickens me.

Yep. Pathetic. And they think they are so manly with their guns

Real men use their fists. They don’t have to rely on a battlefield gun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still a hell of a lot of disinformation out there.....

The mainstream media is hopelessly biased to the left.

They are literally fake news. If this verdict makes you angry and confused, you’ve been horribly mislead by what is essentially propaganda: MSNBC, CNN, NPR.

They are not telling you the truth.

Are any American sources saying they were black? You're talking about MSNBC and CNN based on a foreign source making a mistake that they've quickly corrected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wasn't really following the story, but why was this kid there toting what looks to be a semiautomatic?

To protect a car lot from these rioters who wanted to burn the cars. Because he interfered with that, they went after Rittenhouse and tried to kill him.

Was he under 18 at the time? Why was a minor carrying a semiautomatic rifle and why was he trying to protect the car lot? Did his family own it? That's crazy that a 17 yr old was there with a semiautomatic.

It’s legal in Wisconsin

If he didn’t have it he would be dead trying to protect the car lot from being destroyed

The owner of the lot said under oath that he DID NOT ask cry baby Kyle to protect his property. Cry baby Kyle went there looking for trouble.

Hey dummy, they asked one of Kyle’s friends so he tagged along. Got it?

That's not the same. He's still a cry baby. DP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wasn't really following the story, but why was this kid there toting what looks to be a semiautomatic?

To protect a car lot from these rioters who wanted to burn the cars. Because he interfered with that, they went after Rittenhouse and tried to kill him.

Was he under 18 at the time? Why was a minor carrying a semiautomatic rifle and why was he trying to protect the car lot? Did his family own it? That's crazy that a 17 yr old was there with a semiautomatic.

We allow 17 year olds to join the army and train with M-16s.

Which is sad, right?

Key point missing in this case. So the kid is innocent, and I respect the jury's findings. However, putting a 17 year old in a situation that he took 2 lives (and no, I don't care what 'type' of lives they were) and significantly injured another is something that kid is going to have to live with the rest of his life. I would hope the people that put him in that situation understand how they have horribly changed his life too. That's what I'm left feeling....

No guilty is not the same as innocent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Kyle give testimony, his cross examination, plus two more days of proceedings plus closing arguments by both sides plus rebuttal by prosecutors to closing arguments by defense, plus judge’s instructions to jury of all different charges. I felt that the defense hit it out of the ballpark. The prosecutors did a poor job. I am not surprised by the verdict and I am a lay person.

+1000.

Everyone: turn off MSNBC, turn off CNN.

They are not telling you the truth anymore.

CNN referred to Rittenhouse as a yahoo. Not a huge deal but it's biased, inflammatory, and unprofessional. Chris Cuomo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wasn't really following the story, but why was this kid there toting what looks to be a semiautomatic?

To protect a car lot from these rioters who wanted to burn the cars. Because he interfered with that, they went after Rittenhouse and tried to kill him.

Was he under 18 at the time? Why was a minor carrying a semiautomatic rifle and why was he trying to protect the car lot? Did his family own it? That's crazy that a 17 yr old was there with a semiautomatic.

It’s legal in Wisconsin

If he didn’t have it he would be dead trying to protect the car lot from being destroyed

The owner of the lot said under oath that he DID NOT ask cry baby Kyle to protect his property. Cry baby Kyle went there looking for trouble.

Hey dummy, they asked one of Kyle’s friends so he tagged along. Got it?

DP.. but they didn't ask HIM directly. He chose to tag along.

Did any of the ones who were asked to protect the lot shoot anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I watched Kyle give testimony, his cross examination, plus two more days of proceedings plus closing arguments by both sides plus rebuttal by prosecutors to closing arguments by defense, plus judge’s instructions to jury of all different charges. I felt that the defense hit it out of the ballpark. The prosecutors did a poor job. I am not surprised by the verdict and I am a lay person.

+1000.

Everyone: turn off MSNBC, turn off CNN.

They are not telling you the truth anymore.

CNN referred to Rittenhouse as a yahoo. Not a huge deal but it's biased, inflammatory, and unprofessional. Chris Cuomo.

I hate CNN, but c'mon now, Fox News and their talking heads are just as biased, inflammatory and unprofessional.