Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You seem naive with no critical thinking skills.

Problem with Meghan haters in a nutshell.

The Sussex stans sure like to project.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

A 100% Meghan Markle thinks she is better than Kate and William and the entire British Royal Family. She views them as outdated and uneducated and thinks she is the smartest person in the room, thanks to her private school education and Northwestern degree.

She thinks the royals are beneath her and had 0 problems using them for all their worth, which in her perspective is, global media attention and status, and as soon as she achieved that, she ran away.

Not only that but she is now going scorched earth. They did not get their way with the half-baked half in and half out deal. They wanted to cherry pick what royal duties they will do and the Queen said no. Never cross a narcissist - if they can't get their way they are happy to destroy something just so no one else can have it. She is going to try and take down the monarchy by attacking William, Kate and Charles painting them as racists with Harry's help. Another angle will be mental anguish to bolster sympathy. That isn't working according to plan so that leaves good old blackmail. There are rumors of both Harry and Meghan filming in the palace and palace offices. They are not just in it for the money they are angling for the prize - which is Harry being King.

Their behavior is just bizarre at this point - demanding the Queen attend the christening in a damned if you do damned if you don't way so they can spin it. Did no one read game of thrones? Power is what they want not just filthy lucre.

Queen? Christening? I thought they were done with the BRF?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You seem naive with no critical thinking skills.

Problem with Meghan haters in a nutshell.

The Sussex stans sure like to project.

They are the embodiment of Alinsky for sure.

[Anonymous]

[quoteQueen? Christening? I thought they were done with the BRF?

Cannot be in the line of succession without the christening into the Church of England that the Queen is the head of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[quoteQueen? Christening? I thought they were done with the BRF?

Cannot be in the line of succession without the christening into the Church of England that the Queen is the head of.
DP. I doubt they demand she attend though because she didn’t go to Archie or Louis’ christenings. Is that true about the line of succession? I personally think that Lillibet is a separate person than her parents and she should have a christening just like everyone else in her family. My Uncle is a narc (actually diagnosed unlike all you internet sleuths) and my dad and grandparents always made an effort to leave the door open for his son to be a part of the family. My dad and grandparents are all dead now and my cousin has said that those are some of the happiest memories of his childhood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, at least they admit it now

+100

Have the Meghan haters seen this? Curious why they haven't responded to this (and other takes like it).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

This is also demonstrably not true. Meghan haters seem to have a loose grasp on reality.

DP. She invited more A listers she barely knew to her wedding than actual longtime friends.

Who? She invited Oprah and maybe the Clooneys (although since Eugenia’s husband works for casamigos seems like more of a Harry connect). Priyanka who she is friends with and Patrick Adams, who she worked with, and his wife from pretty little liars. The Beckham’s are Harry’s friends and presumably invited by him. Idris Elba said Harry, who he met a few times through some charity stuff, invited him to the wedding (supposedly to DJ). Do you really know that she invited fewer than three friends considering we likely wouldn’t see their photos because they are nobodies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

This is also demonstrably not true. Meghan haters seem to have a loose grasp on reality.

This seems unlikely. We don’t know the identity of Archie’s godparents which suggests they are normies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

This is also demonstrably not true. Meghan haters seem to have a loose grasp on reality.

DP. She invited more A listers she barely knew to her wedding than actual longtime friends.

Who? She invited Oprah and maybe the Clooneys (although since Eugenia’s husband works for casamigos seems like more of a Harry connect). Priyanka who she is friends with and Patrick Adams, who she worked with, and his wife from pretty little liars. The Beckham’s are Harry’s friends and presumably invited by him. Idris Elba said Harry, who he met a few times through some charity stuff, invited him to the wedding (supposedly to DJ). Do you really know that she invited fewer than three friends considering we likely wouldn’t see their photos because they are nobodies.

Several of her colleges friends also came.

[Anonymous]

It's clear the Meghan haters have a loose relationship with the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

This is also demonstrably not true. Meghan haters seem to have a loose grasp on reality.

This seems unlikely. We don’t know the identity of Archie’s godparents which suggests they are normies.

We don't know for sure but rumormill is one of them was Tiggy Legge-Bourke - Harry's nanny. Diana thought Tiggy was having an affair with Charles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's clear the Meghan haters have a loose relationship with the truth.

You mean the Markles "truth". FIFY

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

This is also demonstrably not true. Meghan haters seem to have a loose grasp on reality.

This seems unlikely. We don’t know the identity of Archie’s godparents which suggests they are normies.

We don't know for sure but rumormill is one of them was Tiggy Legge-Bourke - Harry's nanny. Diana thought Tiggy was having an affair with Charles.

Camilla was also apprehensive about the nanny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They said they wanted privacy on their Sussex royal website. Meghan was very good when she was “on” as a royal. The issue is she didn’t like being the second tier couple, didn’t like ANY bad press about her (even though most was overwhelmingly positive) and really seems to thrive on drama (with her family, his family, the press,whoever).

What I found most telling were the stories from her first maid of honor and her former manager and her uncle that all pretty much said, in different ways, that she uses people, then ghosts them.

She did the same with the royal family. She and Charles shared such a special bond that he walked her down the aisle. Then he cut off their money and boom - he’s blacklisted.

This is demonstrably not true.

I agree. Meghan had a tremendous problem being second behind Kate and William. This is just the way it is and has been for hundreds of years, it is not personal. Meanwhile, Meghan had no problem pulling rank on all the family beneath her! If she can't be number one or on par with Kate and Willaim, then she is unhappy. Her father spoiled her rotten, despite the fact that he wasn't wealthy.

She also used and dropped her first husband. She has no relationship with her father, sibling, and has nearly no friends from her first 30 years of life. Now, she has alienated Harry's family.

This is also demonstrably not true. Meghan haters seem to have a loose grasp on reality.

This seems unlikely. We don’t know the identity of Archie’s godparents which suggests they are normies.

We don't know for sure but rumormill is one of them was Tiggy Legge-Bourke - Harry's nanny. Diana thought Tiggy was having an affair with Charles.

Camilla was also apprehensive about the nanny.

Probably why they kept the god parents identity secret.

[Anonymous]

She is utterly toxic and he is the victim.