Arlington DA
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
They've got good players in both categories, but I don't think this rules out the possibility of a U16 group next year. It's already being piloted in other parts of the country. |
Anonymous
They may be able to recruit some players from outside too. I guess if they don't create U16 DA they can play U16 Red for a year if they don't make U16/17 DA and then maybe play DA when they are U17? Or they could try out for a U16 ECNL team for a year. |
Anonymous
|
I just dont understand this conversation at all.
2019: 04/03 will make up the U16/U17 2020: 03/02 will make up the U18/U19 So...by 2020, Arlington will be a full DA. US Soccer will not pull in the 03s next year just to throw them out in 2020. My 2 cents. |
Anonymous
It kinda happens all the time on the boys side when the younger half of the combined age groups are basically kicked out for a year just to get back in the following year when they are on the older side of the combinedage groups. |
Anonymous
This is opposite of that. I'm not from Arlington. I have no dog in this fight.... but Arlington will have full DA by 2020. |
Anonymous
So four new teams in 2 years minimum (boys and girls da) maybe six (if they create U16 DA too) that practice 4 times a week and demand premium field space. Wouldn’t want to be on U10 blue team! Arlington should have had Amazon build soccer fields. |
Anonymous
| All six teams practice on same field at U9 and U10, so shouldn't be an issue. Maybe less available turf for rec practices though. |
Anonymous
|
Guys....
DA actually creates less teams by condensing....... Instead of U13, U14, U15, U16, U17, U18, U19 (7 teams), they make 5 teams by combining the top 2 age groups. So not more teams...less teams. 2 less to be exact. |
Anonymous
The issue is the demands on fields, which will go up if you know anything about Full DA. Lower teams all get hosed. 6 lower teams to a field is already a joke. Teams like Blue and Black or Gold and Silver already share a QUARTER of a full field. That's 1/8 a field for some teams. |
Anonymous
|
I understand how full DA works....5 teams. It's not hard.
Red becomes DA. Blue becomes Red. White becomes Blue, etc. Dont replace the bottom color team and boom..just like before...BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE....there is actually less teams than before....2 to be exact. |
Anonymous
|
I'll simplify it even more.
I presume ASA has the following teams: U13-U18 Red travel teams (6 teams) Those six teams will become DA and make 5 teams. The demand on fields have decreased. Move every lower team up one color without replacing the bottom. |
Anonymous
DA practices 4x a week, other teams 3. Do the math numbskull. |
Anonymous
Ok. Let me use my fingers. U13-U19 ( 7 Red teams) 7 Red teams x 3 practices =21practices a week Now condense those teams into 5 DA teams 5 DA teams x 4 practices = 20 practices a week Net loss of one practice. (-1) Now, I don't know if there is an ASA Red U19 team. If there isnt, then it's a net gain of 2 practices. I would not consider that a drain on resources. Not bad math for a numbskull, eh |
Anonymous
| You don't have kids in Arlington. The 3rd practice in your math is a massive Monday skills clusterf#ck. DA teams are not crammed into that format. You are a fool to be on here claiming full DA will lessen the demand on field space. It's laughable. |
Anonymous
|
But we'll make sure to use your math on the ASA powerpoint to dupe the bottom of the pyramid subsidizing the salaries that permit all these TDs required to get DA.
When they split DA age groups, your lunatic argument gets even worse. Glad you are not on the sideline of our team. |