Meghan Markle makes her Buckingham Palace Balcony Debut

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Givenchy dress is EVERYTHING. She looks elegant, chic, and perfectly aplomb.

Love that dress. And the Queen didn't make her wear a hat.

Meghan is lovely but for some reason, she looks really out of place. I think it may be because she's more animated than the royals and comes off unnatural.

Out of place, or stands out? I think Meghan stands out in a very good way. The camera loves her, and she’s good for this family’s pr. Did Kate make solo appearances with the Queen this soon after her marriage?

Out of place and I think it may be cultural. Who cares what and when Kate did, stop comparing the two.

I agree that she stands out, and I agree that it might be cultural. In which case, I wonder how well received she will be by the Brits.

Judging by the crowds that cheer her on this weekend - very well.









https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/queen-meghan-markle-live-duchess-12703620

The press is eating it up too!

I suppose I should have included, "over time". But never mind, she will always be beloved, I'm sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holy moly what is the queen wearing?

I love the way the Queen dresses. She always looks perfectly regal to me.

I do too, but I wonder why she always wears a coat outside. Looking at that picture, it seems like either the queen should be hot or Megan should be cold. Maybe QE2 just runs cold?

The Queen is 90. OF COURSE she runs cold! Have you ever known an old person to tell you how "hot" it is????

I know elderly people who overheat easily, and keep the air conditioning on full blast, so I'll say "yes".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holy moly what is the queen wearing?

I love the way the Queen dresses. She always looks perfectly regal to me.

I do too, but I wonder why she always wears a coat outside. Looking at that picture, it seems like either the queen should be hot or Megan should be cold. Maybe QE2 just runs cold?

The Queen is 90. OF COURSE she runs cold! Have you ever known an old person to tell you how "hot" it is????

I know elderly people who overheat easily, and keep the air conditioning on full blast, so I'll say "yes".

That's pretty rare, unless they're overweight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those wanting the Queen to take her coat off - she did. Alongside another view of Meghan without the Givenchy cape.

They both look beautiful.

I hope I can rock my 90s like that!

+1 exactly! and be pretty darn alert and active! I also think the Queen looks very happy when she's with Megan!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holy moly what is the queen wearing?

I love the way the Queen dresses. She always looks perfectly regal to me.

I do too, but I wonder why she always wears a coat outside. Looking at that picture, it seems like either the queen should be hot or Megan should be cold. Maybe QE2 just runs cold?

The Queen is 90. OF COURSE she runs cold! Have you ever known an old person to tell you how "hot" it is????

I know elderly people who overheat easily, and keep the air conditioning on full blast, so I'll say "yes".

+1

Most of my family originally from upstate NY is like this. Not overweight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how Meghan feels as a feminist who now has to bow to Kate and do all these subservient things just because of her husband’s birth order lol, I’d never want that life.

Something tells me you weren't invited in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Givenchy dress is EVERYTHING. She looks elegant, chic, and perfectly aplomb.

Love that dress. And the Queen didn't make her wear a hat.

Meghan is lovely but for some reason, she looks really out of place. I think it may be because she's more animated than the royals and comes off unnatural.

Out of place, or stands out? I think Meghan stands out in a very good way. The camera loves her, and she’s good for this family’s pr. Did Kate make solo appearances with the Queen this soon after her marriage?

Out of place and I think it may be cultural. Who cares what and when Kate did, stop comparing the two.

I agree that she stands out, and I agree that it might be cultural. In which case, I wonder how well received she will be by the Brits.

If Harry isn’t concerned about how “the Brits” will receive her, you shouldn’t either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how Meghan feels as a feminist who now has to bow to Kate and do all these subservient things just because of her husband’s birth order lol, I’d never want that life.

Something tells me you weren't invited in.

I actually agree with the PP. she’s still on the post wedding high, but over the course of years yeah no f’ing way! Especially when she’s proven to have left a previous marriage for no obvious reason. If they have kids they’ll be British royal assets... Polo, Eton, private schools, tea parties. If you are a laid back Cali girl then it’s just too too much cultural difference. My mom is a foreigner, over the course of a lifetime it’s torture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how Meghan feels as a feminist who now has to bow to Kate and do all these subservient things just because of her husband’s birth order lol, I’d never want that life.

Something tells me you weren't invited in.

I actually agree with the PP. she’s still on the post wedding high, but over the course of years yeah no f’ing way! Especially when she’s proven to have left a previous marriage for no obvious reason. If they have kids they’ll be British royal assets... Polo, Eton, private schools, tea parties. If you are a laid back Cali girl then it’s just too too much cultural difference. My mom is a foreigner, over the course of a lifetime it’s torture.

Yes but she is not a regular middle class girl from California.

She is from Hollywood, where they already live a separate life and live in a different world than the rest of us.

She has shown that she has no issues leaving her old live (pre Hollywood) for something she sees as better. So why would you think she would have issues leaving Hollywood for an even better life?

Besides, as young and as beautiful as she is, she is about at the end of her Hollywood shelf life. She is just not a good enough actress to have the kind of long term career as someone like Meryl Streep or enough of a "type" like Diane Keaton to transition into the limited middle age and older roles available for females. Even if this is a calculating marriage (does not seem like it) she has made a smart next step move.

[Anonymous]

She’s 36 and old enough to know herself enough to make this life changing decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how Meghan feels as a feminist who now has to bow to Kate and do all these subservient things just because of her husband’s birth order lol, I’d never want that life.

Something tells me you weren't invited in.

I actually agree with the PP. she’s still on the post wedding high, but over the course of years yeah no f’ing way! Especially when she’s proven to have left a previous marriage for no obvious reason. If they have kids they’ll be British royal assets... Polo, Eton, private schools, tea parties. If you are a laid back Cali girl then it’s just too too much cultural difference. My mom is a foreigner, over the course of a lifetime it’s torture.

The naysayers amuse the hell out of me because Meghan keeps blowing them out of the water every time they think there's potential fault.

In contrast to this, I say she knows well the wonder of what she signed up for and she won't take it for granted. She's already proving she's a hard worker and the British public loves her for it. Headlines in the US and UK are going to be swifty followed by global interest, starting with the EU and her tour in Australia & Asia-Pacific this October.

Meghan never stops and she won't sit at home + shop for 17 years either. Like I said before, the era of the Duchess of Sussex is going to be awesome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how Meghan feels as a feminist who now has to bow to Kate and do all these subservient things just because of her husband’s birth order lol, I’d never want that life.

Something tells me you weren't invited in.

I actually agree with the PP. she’s still on the post wedding high, but over the course of years yeah no f’ing way! Especially when she’s proven to have left a previous marriage for no obvious reason. If they have kids they’ll be British royal assets... Polo, Eton, private schools, tea parties. If you are a laid back Cali girl then it’s just too too much cultural difference. My mom is a foreigner, over the course of a lifetime it’s torture.

Yes but she is not a regular middle class girl from California.

She is from Hollywood, where they already live a separate life and live in a different world than the rest of us.

She has shown that she has no issues leaving her old live (pre Hollywood) for something she sees as better. So why would you think she would have issues leaving Hollywood for an even better life?

Besides, as young and as beautiful as she is, she is about at the end of her Hollywood shelf life. She is just not a good enough actress to have the kind of long term career as someone like Meryl Streep or enough of a "type" like Diane Keaton to transition into the limited middle age and older roles available for females. Even if this is a calculating marriage (does not seem like it) she has made a smart next step move.

Moving to Hollywood to make it as an actress is no comparison to joining the British royal family. The difference is like getting into stargazing versus moving to Mars for a space mission.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder how Meghan feels as a feminist who now has to bow to Kate and do all these subservient things just because of her husband’s birth order lol, I’d never want that life.

Something tells me you weren't invited in.

I actually agree with the PP. she’s still on the post wedding high, but over the course of years yeah no f’ing way! Especially when she’s proven to have left a previous marriage for no obvious reason. If they have kids they’ll be British royal assets... Polo, Eton, private schools, tea parties. If you are a laid back Cali girl then it’s just too too much cultural difference. My mom is a foreigner, over the course of a lifetime it’s torture.

Yes but she is not a regular middle class girl from California.

She is from Hollywood, where they already live a separate life and live in a different world than the rest of us.

She has shown that she has no issues leaving her old live (pre Hollywood) for something she sees as better. So why would you think she would have issues leaving Hollywood for an even better life?

Besides, as young and as beautiful as she is, she is about at the end of her Hollywood shelf life. She is just not a good enough actress to have the kind of long term career as someone like Meryl Streep or enough of a "type" like Diane Keaton to transition into the limited middle age and older roles available for females. Even if this is a calculating marriage (does not seem like it) she has made a smart next step move.

Moving to Hollywood to make it as an actress is no comparison to joining the British royal family. The difference is like getting into stargazing versus moving to Mars for a space mission.

Actually it seems to prove a great foundation for a flawless transition into royal families.



She knew how to handle the fame, fortune, and publicty from Day 1. I mean the woman had four official working Royal events before she was even married. Appeared in a joint event with the Queen not even a month post-marriage.







She's on every magazine cover from the U.S., to the U.K., to the E.U. THAT'S what star-power and a woman who has a work ethic achieves.

[Anonymous]

A common but beautiful American girl marrying a prince (or really any beautiful girl marrying the world's most eligible prince) is why she is on covers everywhere. It has zero to do with how hard she works or does not work.

According to the kate haters of dcum, Kate is lazy and does nothing but shop, yet is also plastered all over magazine stands everywhere.

It is the combo of a beautiful commoner marrying a handsome prince who America has followed since infancy that gets them on magazine covers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holy moly what is the queen wearing?

I love the way the Queen dresses. She always looks perfectly regal to me.

I do too, but I wonder why she always wears a coat outside. Looking at that picture, it seems like either the queen should be hot or Megan should be cold. Maybe QE2 just runs cold?

The Queen is 90. OF COURSE she runs cold! Have you ever known an old person to tell you how "hot" it is????

I know elderly people who overheat easily, and keep the air conditioning on full blast, so I'll say "yes".

That's pretty rare, unless they're overweight.

I think there are many more 90 year olds who struggle to keep on weight (and are thus often cold) than the opposite. The queen is obviously well taken care of, and at a really good weight. The other elderly women I know who are similarly active, and similarly well proportioned seem to feel temperature the same way that other people do. My 95 year old godmother is a very "proper" lady, former ambassador's wife, and she wouldn't wear a long sleeved dress, long gloves and a coat to go outside in the summer, but maybe it's unseasonably cold in London right now.