Oscars red carpet

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Heidi Klum wore something normal for once! This is actually great.


I like it too. Almost didn't recognize her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman... yikes.



Ugly dress.


I like the dress. Not crazy about the aesthetic enhancements to her face.


Old lady loose skin thin arms...needs longer sleeves.


This is not "old lady loose skin thin arms." I'd kill for this definition.




Great arms but looks too thin. Is this a wig?


100% it's a wig.

I kind of hate to be a hater, but Nicole Kidman seems unhinged. The obsession with being thin and not aging. Ma'am, we know you're 58. Her banter with Ewan McGregor was so cringey and he was clearly not into it at all. She seems unable to process that she's no longer 30 and simply doesn't know how to mature. It's really bizarre.


Yes to all of this. Plus she has a bizarre need to be the coquettuish sexpot in everything. Yes, Nicole you are the sexiest and you totally look 35. There is nothing wrong with wanting to look attractive over 50 but she seems slightly unhinged and possibly narcissistic. It did not help when she was hauling Keith Urban around and posing like he is her 20 year old son. But now that Keith got sick of her and left she's doubling down on the need to be the sexiest woman in Hollywood.Weird sh-t.



Yeah that schtick has gotten ridiculous, and from such an accomplished woman to boot. I think she's taking this divorce hard, and overcompensating. Hopefully she'll settle down. Mid life crises are not pretty to witness!

She took her divorce from Cruise hard as well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.


I just dozed off looking at this.


You haven't seen the side view:


Hahahahahahaha indeed, I corrected myself later!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.


I just dozed off looking at this.


You haven't seen the side view:


Hahahahahahaha indeed, I corrected myself later!

+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Speaking of maternity, Wunmi Mosaku is wearing a dress in the most amazing color. The neckline is a bit fussy for my taste but the color and beading is exquisite, and her hair and makeup is amazing as well:



I posted the above -- it was a top 5 look from the awards for me. But then Wunmi went and wore the below to the Vanity Fair party, which I also love, and also just love them next to each other. She totally won the night for me.


She’s gorgeous in that lavender dress.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman... yikes.



Ugly dress.


I like the dress. Not crazy about the aesthetic enhancements to her face.


Old lady loose skin thin arms...needs longer sleeves.


This is not "old lady loose skin thin arms." I'd kill for this definition.




Great arms but looks too thin. Is this a wig?


100% it's a wig.

I kind of hate to be a hater, but Nicole Kidman seems unhinged. The obsession with being thin and not aging. Ma'am, we know you're 58. Her banter with Ewan McGregor was so cringey and he was clearly not into it at all. She seems unable to process that she's no longer 30 and simply doesn't know how to mature. It's really bizarre.


Yes to all of this. Plus she has a bizarre need to be the coquettuish sexpot in everything. Yes, Nicole you are the sexiest and you totally look 35. There is nothing wrong with wanting to look attractive over 50 but she seems slightly unhinged and possibly narcissistic. It did not help when she was hauling Keith Urban around and posing like he is her 20 year old son. But now that Keith got sick of her and left she's doubling down on the need to be the sexiest woman in Hollywood.Weird sh-t.



Yeah that schtick has gotten ridiculous, and from such an accomplished woman to boot. I think she's taking this divorce hard, and overcompensating. Hopefully she'll settle down. Mid life crises are not pretty to witness!

She took her divorce from Cruise hard as well.


She's too focused on herself to make a marriage work. Similar to J Lo in that way.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman... yikes.



Ugly dress.


I like the dress. Not crazy about the aesthetic enhancements to her face.


Old lady loose skin thin arms...needs longer sleeves.


This is not "old lady loose skin thin arms." I'd kill for this definition.




Great arms but looks too thin. Is this a wig?


100% it's a wig.

I kind of hate to be a hater, but Nicole Kidman seems unhinged. The obsession with being thin and not aging. Ma'am, we know you're 58. Her banter with Ewan McGregor was so cringey and he was clearly not into it at all. She seems unable to process that she's no longer 30 and simply doesn't know how to mature. It's really bizarre.


Yes to all of this. Plus she has a bizarre need to be the coquettuish sexpot in everything. Yes, Nicole you are the sexiest and you totally look 35. There is nothing wrong with wanting to look attractive over 50 but she seems slightly unhinged and possibly narcissistic. It did not help when she was hauling Keith Urban around and posing like he is her 20 year old son. But now that Keith got sick of her and left she's doubling down on the need to be the sexiest woman in Hollywood.Weird sh-t.



Yeah that schtick has gotten ridiculous, and from such an accomplished woman to boot. I think she's taking this divorce hard, and overcompensating. Hopefully she'll settle down. Mid life crises are not pretty to witness!

She took her divorce from Cruise hard as well.


She's too focused on herself to make a marriage work. Similar to J Lo in that way.


Not really. J Lo has had mostly short marriages.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Heidi Klum wore something normal for once! This is actually great.


It's okay. It's not bandage tight AND short AND cleavage-y so it's a step in the right direction for her. But the styling with the layered choker that matches the beading on the dress is cheesy to me, and it's one of those nude dresses where it looks like you can sort of see the shadow of her undergarments, which I hate. I would love it so much more if the dress was an actual color instead of flesh toned, and if the necklace wasn't so matchy matchy.

As Michael would say, the taste level just isn't there.


Yeah even a chocolate brown on the dress would be better.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.



Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??


Zendaya looks absolutely gorgeous! Agree that RP's face looks odd, but then again, it always has been a bit strange looking.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anyone watching. I just saw Kelly Ripa. I love the dress, but the top is a no-go. Especially because of her flat chest, all I can think about when I look at this is "flat as a board". It looks a little softer in this picture; when I watched her on the red carpet, the top part looked very stiff and flat.



She looks gorgeous as it is. Everyone doesn't need or want implants.


+1


She's very pretty but her body looks like a young teen boy.


So? I'm also pretty flat chested and petite. I don't see what the problem is. Beauty comes in all shapes and sizes.


Also flat chested and I hate that dress. I think it’s because aesthetics is about balance and contrast so if you take an angular flat surfaced person and put them in an angular flat surfaced dress, it’s not visually pleasing. Something that creates more curve or movement would be more visually appealing. I’m not saying she needs falsies — just that something that is more fluid would look better. I actually don’t think that dress would look good on anyone though. Unfortunate because it’s otherwise a nice dress.

+1 and adding that the neckline hits the absolute widest part of her which is why it’s so bad.

All this Kelly Ripa bashing when Kirsten Dunst has the EXACT SAME neckline and an objectively worse dress. Why do this when you can wear anything?


DP. Not a fan of the neckline, but I love the tiered dress.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.



Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??


"Unflattering"? Wut. She looks amazing. What about it is unflattering?

He always looks like that but is particularly pasty here.


Her side boob and torso aren’t attractive. She looks too thin.


Some of you are NEVER happy. She has a tall thin frame. I think the dress looks great on her. She's not "too" anything.


Agree. She looks fantastic, as always.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:




Ava looks good. She’s glowing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:A better photo of Zendaya's dress. I just want to compare and contrast with Gwyneth's dress. They are actually similar levels of revealing, because while Gwyneth's has the hip fully visible instead of covered, Zendaya's has more side boob and it' visible skin instead of illusion netting.

But Zendaya's is so much sexier and prettier specifically because it's selective in what it covers up and hides. And in this jersey fabric, it just flowed and moved with her even though the bodice was obviously extremely tailored and then taped into place. It's seductive without feeling naked, whereas Gwyneth's dress is naked without feeling seductive. This winds up looking made for her and comfortable, whereas Gwyneth's dress looked awkward and like it was a joke.



Zendaya’s look is also unflattering. And what happened to Pattinson’s face??


"Unflattering"? Wut. She looks amazing. What about it is unflattering?

He always looks like that but is particularly pasty here.


Her side boob and torso aren’t attractive. She looks too thin.


+1. I think Tom Holland would look better in that dress, because the torso would be more filled out and he probably would have a bigger chest as well.


Zendaya looked so skinny in Challengers I had to turn the movie off. She looked anorexic.


That's a you problem.

She's very tall, this is how she carries weight on her frame. What a weird reason to stop watching a movie (which was really fun!).


+1
I grew up tall and very, very skinny and I can't tell you how many dummies would ask if I had anorexia. No, idiot. I'm just tall and skinny, thanks for making me even more self-conscious. Some people just can't grasp that bodies come in all different sizes and shapes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

Scandanavian minimalism, lol.


Hideous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Demi Moore as well but amazing dress. I don't know how to post pictures from a tablet. It was a black sparkly sheath with feathers for the top.




Yasss!


I'm sick of Demi Moore. When it looked like she had lobbed her hair for Paris Fashion Week, I was so excited - but alas, it was just a wig. The hair is beyond dated and old.


Her hair is gorgeous. You're rude. You will never look that good at her age.


Mmkay. We disagree, and it's clear who is rude here.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: