The FBI has *ARRESTED* a sitting judge in Milwaukee, over allegations it obstructed immigration enforcement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you direct the target of a federal warrant to an escape route that allows them to evade capture you have committed a crime.

Exactly.

Thank you for the correct synopsis here.

The fact is: Biden should have had her arrested. The miscarriage of justice was the Biden administration ignoring the crime she unquestionably committed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this judge is not corrupt, then there is no such thing as a corrupt judge. And I’m pretty sure corrupt judges are a whole thing in this country. Until recently they have been a protected class of criminal, kind of like illegal aliens. The party is over and we dodged a bullet, probably a lot of them.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
BTW, getting arrested in the court house is not unusual. If a suspect has an appointment with the court, a lawyer, you know he might be there. I knew a friend whose ex husband had her arrested (detained actually, not fully arrested) in front of the court house for violating a civil protective order. During her divorce. They had probably 5 million in assets together. They released her shortly thereafter. But it was messy. The more you know the less crazy these things sound!

What we are actually witnessing is policing. Policing everywhere.

The judge was shady and will now have a hearing. I doubt they held her long. It’s rough, but the feds are making her an example by charging her. People are shocked bc they never see policing in their tender neighborhoods. These police actions are actually helping low income people who suffer the most from criminal actions in their neighborhoods. Ask the neighbors how they feel. The rich people are sad when they read about it in their sunlit kitchens. Just another angle. Wealthy people don’t usually feel the impact of crime or resource pressures bc their kids go to private school and their neighborhoods are isolated.

He is not doing this for his mega donors

In a COURT HOUSE, not a COURT ROOM. That is the difference. She didn't want the circus in HER COURT ROOM.

A jurisdiction just means she is responsible. Like law officers can be sued for committing crimes, within their jurisdiction. EG she has no excuse. She broke the law within the jurisdiction that she was entrusted with.

So what? Her courtroom is a public place where agents can lawfully make an arrest without a judicial warrant. Her desire to avoid “a circus” has nothing to do with anything.

Nope. A judge has full jurisdiction over the four corners of the courtroom. If you cede that to ICE, then it is another piece of lawlessness that is normalized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
BTW, getting arrested in the court house is not unusual. If a suspect has an appointment with the court, a lawyer, you know he might be there. I knew a friend whose ex husband had her arrested (detained actually, not fully arrested) in front of the court house for violating a civil protective order. During her divorce. They had probably 5 million in assets together. They released her shortly thereafter. But it was messy. The more you know the less crazy these things sound!

What we are actually witnessing is policing. Policing everywhere.

The judge was shady and will now have a hearing. I doubt they held her long. It’s rough, but the feds are making her an example by charging her. People are shocked bc they never see policing in their tender neighborhoods. These police actions are actually helping low income people who suffer the most from criminal actions in their neighborhoods. Ask the neighbors how they feel. The rich people are sad when they read about it in their sunlit kitchens. Just another angle. Wealthy people don’t usually feel the impact of crime or resource pressures bc their kids go to private school and their neighborhoods are isolated.

He is not doing this for his mega donors

In a COURT HOUSE, not a COURT ROOM. That is the difference. She didn't want the circus in HER COURT ROOM.

So what? Her courtroom is a public place where agents can lawfully make an arrest without a judicial warrant. Her desire to avoid “a circus” has nothing to do with anything.

Nope. A judge has full jurisdiction over the four corners of the courtroom. If you cede that to ICE, then it is another piece of lawlessness that is normalized.

A jurisdiction just means she is responsible. Like law officers can be sued for committing crimes, within their jurisdiction. EG she has no excuse. She broke the law within the jurisdiction that she was entrusted with.

[Anonymous]

This judge will likely be suspended until the resolution of the case if she’s indicted. Her breach of judicial ethics is going to cost her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In a COURT HOUSE, not a COURT ROOM. That is the difference. She didn't want the circus in HER COURT ROOM.

Could you please post a link that can prove your assertion that the federal agents planned to effect the arrest in the court room?

Logic. They were in the courtroom. She sent him out the side door that led to the same hallway as the "public" door. And they didn't arrest him, PER THEIR FILING when the encountered him in the hallway and in the freaking elevator. The whole thing was a set up. Read the filing.

The person in the elevator was a DEA agent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her previous job was at Catholic Charities. Was she working with illegal immigrants coaching them on what to say at asylum hearings?

Was she a lawyer advising clients? So let me get this straight. You want to arrest lawyers giving advice to clients even though she is currently holding another job?

What the F? This is insane. Who are you people?

I'm saying a judge that will lead someone to escape from arrest by ICE, will probably be coaching people on what lies to tell to get asylum.
These asylum cases are mostly bogus.

[Anonymous]

If a DCUM disrupted an arrest they would be arrested as well. It’s the law.

[Anonymous]

I don’t know why any of you are taking these charges seriously.

She was not concealing or harboring a criminal, unless they have evidence of her intent. And, per the Fischer ruling, she wasn’t obstructing an official proceeding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why any of you are taking these charges seriously.

She was not concealing or harboring a criminal, unless they have evidence of her intent. And, per the Fischer ruling, she wasn’t obstructing an official proceeding.

She is being charged with interference with a federal law enforcement operation and unlawful concealment of an individual subject to arrest.

[Anonymous]

If foreigner don't have a first amendment right to protest Israel then why do they have a right to due process?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If foreigner don't have a first amendment right to protest Israel then why do they have a right to due process?

What are you even talking about? This judge is not a foreigner.

[Anonymous]

I am not pro or con anything.

Any country-hick local lawyer can tell you they have NEVER had a judge show them an exit (other than “get out of my court room”’or some other verbal threat) — or help their client with anything outside of the case at hand. That is VERY UNUSUAL.

She had a bad day. A bad moment where she let personal issues get in the way of her judgement. County Judges are people. Now she is being investigated that’s all. Unusual times. Unusual circumstances.

I don’t feel this way about federal judges at ALL, who are the top of their profession and the top of their class of Americans. I don’t think attacking their written rulings are the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why any of you are taking these charges seriously.

She was not concealing or harboring a criminal, unless they have evidence of her intent. And, per the Fischer ruling, she wasn’t obstructing an official proceeding.

She is being charged with interference with a federal law enforcement operation and unlawful concealment of an individual subject to arrest.

I read the criminal complaint.