Second Gentleman scandal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emhoff had a position of power relative to the nanny, and he abused it.

Was the pregnancy terminated?

The gossip mill says maybe.

None of the rest of the world cares.

I care. The first guy sounds like a loose cannon sex pest who can be blackmailed and extorted. .

How can he be blackmailed now that it's all out?

He’s a creepy sex pest. You think this is the only time in his life he’s had poor judgment and low impulse around women? You think this is the only skeleton in his Hollyweird closet?

I'd like to know what exactly a blackmailer can get out of him. He's just the spouse of the VP and possibly the President. Is he going to sneak into the SCIF and make off with top secret documents?

The dossier on this creep is prob a mile long.

That was not the question. Let's say for the sake of argument that this is not the only time he cheated on his ex-wife. Let's say that he cheated on her 200 times. What exactly can someone blackmail out of him? Like what can they reasonably expect him to get them?

Nothing. He isn't the VP, he doesn't get classified briefings and has no impact on policy making or decision making.

The "creepy sex pest blackmail material" poster has chosen to ignore my question. Near as I can tell, the answer is nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

No doubt, but they would probably be more concerned about voting for a man who has had at least 26 women accuse him of sexual misconduct.
https://www.businessinsider.com/women-accused-trump-sexual-misconduct-list-2017-12#karen-johnson-12

You think this is the only time Doug has been a creep? Oh, sweetie.

Lest we forget when he locked lips with Dr. Biden at SOTU. Bad judgment on display.

…..Never to be unseen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only things Melania got press for were when they reflected her poor judgment. Plagerizing Michelle Obama’s speech, wearing insulting jackets,

We feel sorry for her that her husband humiliated her by cheating on her, but she chose to stay with him and extort more
Money from him.

Exactly how else did we excoriate her or use Melania’s actions as a means to undermine trump. There is so much material on Trump it would be really hard to fit the actions of his wife in there.

You think an action of Harris’s husband should or will derail her campaign?

You all are desperate and nuts. It is completely pathetic.

Re: Melania - oh what a selective memory you have. “Soft porn star, escort” and much worse ring any bells? You can stop your blatant hypocrisy any time now.

Those claims were in response to right wingers saying how classy she was compared to Michelle Obama and the contention that she actually immigrated on a genius visa (or whatever it was). I do believe Melania supported herself through relationships with men, including Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only things Melania got press for were when they reflected her poor judgment. Plagerizing Michelle Obama’s speech, wearing insulting jackets,

We feel sorry for her that her husband humiliated her by cheating on her, but she chose to stay with him and extort more
Money from him.

Exactly how else did we excoriate her or use Melania’s actions as a means to undermine trump. There is so much material on Trump it would be really hard to fit the actions of his wife in there.

You think an action of Harris’s husband should or will derail her campaign?

You all are desperate and nuts. It is completely pathetic.

Re: Melania - oh what a selective memory you have. “Soft porn star, escort” and much worse ring any bells? You can stop your blatant hypocrisy any time now.

What explanation do you have for the nude photos of Melania? How would you characterize them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just love the irony of MAGA trying to make a big deal out of this non-story about a non-candidate.

You STILL don’t get it, do you? LWNJs certainly are dense. This story / Doug Emhoff is being treated exactly as Melania Trump was (and is) treated by Democrats. You are getting a taste of your own, well-deserved medicine.

You don’t know shit about me. And I don’t give a shit about melania. So go jump back on Donald’s balls you weirdo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only things Melania got press for were when they reflected her poor judgment. Plagerizing Michelle Obama’s speech, wearing insulting jackets,

We feel sorry for her that her husband humiliated her by cheating on her, but she chose to stay with him and extort more
Money from him.

Exactly how else did we excoriate her or use Melania’s actions as a means to undermine trump. There is so much material on Trump it would be really hard to fit the actions of his wife in there.

You think an action of Harris’s husband should or will derail her campaign?

You all are desperate and nuts. It is completely pathetic.

Re: Melania - oh what a selective memory you have. “Soft porn star, escort” and much worse ring any bells? You can stop your blatant hypocrisy any time now.

Those claims were in response to right wingers saying how classy she was compared to Michelle Obama and the contention that she actually immigrated on a genius visa (or whatever it was). I do believe Melania supported herself through relationships with men, including Trump.

Just like Ivana, she is Trump's handler.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

No doubt, but they would probably be more concerned about voting for a man who has had at least 26 women accuse him of sexual misconduct.
https://www.businessinsider.com/women-accused-trump-sexual-misconduct-list-2017-12#karen-johnson-12

You think this is the only time Doug has been a creep? Oh, sweetie.

Lest we forget when he locked lips with Dr. Biden at SOTU. Bad judgment on display.

…..Never to be unseen.

I came here just to post this little memory. WTF was that?? This guy must have some Rizz that doesn't translate over camera.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is a statement, Emhoff says he “took responsibility.”

What does that mean? Paid for an abortion? Paid off the mother?

Sounds like she had the kid. So I’d assume an NDA and multi-million settlement.

Wrong. There is no Doug Emhoff love child out there. Keep up.

Are you saying the child was aborted — presumably he pressured her to do so? That’s troubling.

What’s troubling is you presuming that this woman didn’t make her own decision.

DP. This made me laugh - shades of Democrats claiming women were “made” to vote for Trump because their husbands told them too. Remember that idiocy, Dems? “Troubling,” indeed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

No doubt, but they would probably be more concerned about voting for a man who has had at least 26 women accuse him of sexual misconduct.
https://www.businessinsider.com/women-accused-trump-sexual-misconduct-list-2017-12#karen-johnson-12

You think this is the only time Doug has been a creep? Oh, sweetie.

Lest we forget when he locked lips with Dr. Biden at SOTU. Bad judgment on display.

…..Never to be unseen.

🤮
Who made the lips move there - Jill or Doug?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only things Melania got press for were when they reflected her poor judgment. Plagerizing Michelle Obama’s speech, wearing insulting jackets,

We feel sorry for her that her husband humiliated her by cheating on her, but she chose to stay with him and extort more
Money from him.

Exactly how else did we excoriate her or use Melania’s actions as a means to undermine trump. There is so much material on Trump it would be really hard to fit the actions of his wife in there.

You think an action of Harris’s husband should or will derail her campaign?

You all are desperate and nuts. It is completely pathetic.

Re: Melania - oh what a selective memory you have. “Soft porn star, escort” and much worse ring any bells? You can stop your blatant hypocrisy any time now.

Those claims were in response to right wingers saying how classy she was compared to Michelle Obama and the contention that she actually immigrated on a genius visa (or whatever it was). I do believe Melania supported herself through relationships with men, including Trump.

You can stop spinning any day now. Those “claims” were simply the ugly Democratic machine at work and you know it. Especially ugly coming from the party that purports to be against misogyny but is anything but. At any rate, we’ve all seen how Ds tear apart any conservative and their families. Don’t expect anything less in return.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:why isn't the media talking about that Harris wasn't a virgin when she got married? She had so many boyfriends

I can't get over the fact that she married a guy who wasn't a virgin...! How did that happen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how Kamala is known to have elevated herself “through relationships with men” including Doug.

Slutshaming is gross

Hmm. Tell us about all the disgusting slutshaming you’ve said about Lauren Boebert - who I can’t stand, btw. Take a good, hard look in the mirror.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just love the irony of MAGA trying to make a big deal out of this non-story about a non-candidate.

You STILL don’t get it, do you? LWNJs certainly are dense. This story / Doug Emhoff is being treated exactly as Melania Trump was (and is) treated by Democrats. You are getting a taste of your own, well-deserved medicine.

You don’t know shit about me. And I don’t give a shit about melania. So go jump back on Donald’s balls you weirdo.

You’ve just told me all I need to know about you. Keeping it klassy, as usual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

He’s a creepy sex pest. You think this is the only time in his life he’s had poor judgment and low impulse around women? You think this is the only skeleton in his Hollyweird closet?

Trump has a proven history of giving security clearances to people with poor judgment, so apparently we don't worry about stuff like that.

Tricia Newbold, a White House security adviser, told Democrats in Congress that clearances were initially denied to dozens of administration officials because of concerns over possible foreign influence, conflicts of interests, questionable or criminal conduct, financial problems or drug abuse.

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/whistleblower-says-ivanka-jared-got-security-clearance-over-experts-advice-idUSKCN1RD2PD/

[Anonymous]

It’s so funny that Democrats can’t bear to stay on the topic of Doug Emhoff and instead have to keep deflecting. Very telling.