Second Gentleman scandal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broke nanny gets pregnant with a rich lawyer’s kid and she aborted it? Nanny’s love kids. It’s pretty abnormal for such a woman to abort, especially since he had money.

The daily mail said that there were no babies born during that period with either her last name or Emhoff’s last name.

Readers prefer to skip over this fact.

That’s not what the article said at all. DM was unable to confirm in their limited search.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broke nanny gets pregnant with a rich lawyer’s kid and she aborted it? Nanny’s love kids. It’s pretty abnormal for such a woman to abort, especially since he had money.

The daily mail said that there were no babies born during that period with either her last name or Emhoff’s last name.

Good grief. Ever heard of adoption?
DP

The biological mother (father) remain on a second birth certificate. Hospitals maintain bio mother birth records.

It’s almost as if he was an immensely powerful entertainment lawyer with a forte for making things like this disappear, NDAs, and out of public record and media…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broke nanny gets pregnant with a rich lawyer’s kid and she aborted it? Nanny’s love kids. It’s pretty abnormal for such a woman to abort, especially since he had money.

True, Nannies do love kids. You know who wasn’t so keen to have a baby? DonOld. He wanted to have Tiffany aborted.

“When Donald Trump learned that then-girlfriend Marla Maples was pregnant with Tiffany, Trump said, "Excuse me, what happened?" and "Oh, great"—the latest bombshell revelation contained in 15 hours of tapes from The Howard Stern Show released this week to Newsweek and Factba.se.

"I'm glad it happened. I have a great little daughter, Tiffany," Trump told his pal Stern in the 2004 interview. "But, you know, at the time it was like, 'Excuse me, what happened?' And then I said, 'Well, what are we going to do about this?' [Marla] said, 'Are you serious? It's the most beautiful day of our lives.' I said, 'Oh, great.'"

Did you miss this part?

True. No gotcha moment here. The part that most have missed is Trump sexualizing his 10 month old baby in the same Stern interview! “Tiffany is a beautiful baby. She has her mother’s legs. Then mimicking breasts with his hands he adds: We don’t know whether or not she’s got this part yet but time will tell.”

[Anonymous]

Very unsavory of him! Interestingly, I never liked him. However I've always been very excited at the idea of Kamala Harris as President!

We are not our spouses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions for those of you who think this is irrelevant, has no reflection on Harris, think that this kind of workplace sexual harassment is fine, are calling the nanny a homewrecker and worse, and more: Did you attack Lewinsky back in the day too? Did you wear a pussy hat at a march? Did you support the goals of the #metoo movement?

This all happened before the couple ever met. Years before. I suspect he told her all about it as they got serious. The ex-wife and the kids clearly have a good relationship with him, so it is a non-issue.

Why would Harris marry such a creep?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Even my Republican grandma said I really don't understand why anyone cares about this. Lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions for those of you who think this is irrelevant, has no reflection on Harris, think that this kind of workplace sexual harassment is fine, are calling the nanny a homewrecker and worse, and more: Did you attack Lewinsky back in the day too? Did you wear a pussy hat at a march? Did you support the goals of the #metoo movement?

This all happened before the couple ever met. Years before. I suspect he told her all about it as they got serious. The ex-wife and the kids clearly have a good relationship with him, so it is a non-issue.

Why would Harris marry such a creep?

Maybe she loves him and felt he learned and changed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions for those of you who think this is irrelevant, has no reflection on Harris, think that this kind of workplace sexual harassment is fine, are calling the nanny a homewrecker and worse, and more: Did you attack Lewinsky back in the day too? Did you wear a pussy hat at a march? Did you support the goals of the #metoo movement?

This all happened before the couple ever met. Years before. I suspect he told her all about it as they got serious. The ex-wife and the kids clearly have a good relationship with him, so it is a non-issue.

Why would Harris marry such a creep?

Because she is quite familiar with marital infidelity herself. Ask Mrs. Brown about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We’re seeing the real Emhoff behind the squeaky clean image the campaign was trying to present. It’s always best to know the truth about people, IMO.

is it really, PP? I mean, do we all need to know what our friends, neighbors, loved ones—or even our politicians—did in the past? I think we would all be in for some nasty surprises and it would make the functioning of society so much more difficult.

When they are married to the leader of the free world, yes.

1) I feel like the alternative (Trump) would end the free world, so while I'm disappointed in Dougie (and not for the first time), we all just have bigger problems.

2) And really, the orange alternative requires we overlook a whole lot more infidelity and gross man behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even my Republican grandma said I really don't understand why anyone cares about this. Lol

Yeah but I thought Republicans were weird so….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even my Republican grandma said I really don't understand why anyone cares about this. Lol

She does not understand because she is:
1. Republican
2. Grandma (from another generation)

That is not surprising.

I suspect the answer may be different for younger democratic women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions for those of you who think this is irrelevant, has no reflection on Harris, think that this kind of workplace sexual harassment is fine, are calling the nanny a homewrecker and worse, and more: Did you attack Lewinsky back in the day too? Did you wear a pussy hat at a march? Did you support the goals of the #metoo movement?

This all happened before the couple ever met. Years before. I suspect he told her all about it as they got serious. The ex-wife and the kids clearly have a good relationship with him, so it is a non-issue.

The existence of a good relationship has nothing to do with whether the spouse of the potential president has committed serious workplace sexual harassment that the potential president knew about and excused. I mean, we’ve seen Democrats make that argument before (and like this time, viciously attack the victim) but it wasn’t right then and it’s not right now.

OMG shut up. She worked at the school his daughter attended and then moonlighted as a nanny for his family. She was in her 30s not a 19 year-old. Sounds like it was consensual to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions for those of you who think this is irrelevant, has no reflection on Harris, think that this kind of workplace sexual harassment is fine, are calling the nanny a homewrecker and worse, and more: Did you attack Lewinsky back in the day too? Did you wear a pussy hat at a march? Did you support the goals of the #metoo movement?

This all happened before the couple ever met. Years before. I suspect he told her all about it as they got serious. The ex-wife and the kids clearly have a good relationship with him, so it is a non-issue.

Why would Harris marry such a creep?

Because she is quite familiar with marital infidelity herself. Ask Mrs. Brown about it.

Mrs. Brown was technically still married but had been estranged from her husband for ten years at that point. People stay married for all sorts of reasons (usually financial) but maintain completely separate lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions for those of you who think this is irrelevant, has no reflection on Harris, think that this kind of workplace sexual harassment is fine, are calling the nanny a homewrecker and worse, and more: Did you attack Lewinsky back in the day too? Did you wear a pussy hat at a march? Did you support the goals of the #metoo movement?

This all happened before the couple ever met. Years before. I suspect he told her all about it as they got serious. The ex-wife and the kids clearly have a good relationship with him, so it is a non-issue.

Why would Harris marry such a creep?

Because she is quite familiar with marital infidelity herself. Ask Mrs. Brown about it.

Mrs. Brown was technically still married but had been estranged from her husband for ten years at that point. People stay married for all sorts of reasons (usually financial) but maintain completely separate lives.

Yup. My brother is separated from his wife, but they're not divorced because she has medical conditions, and he's providing the insurance. He has a girlfriend, and she has a boyfriend.