Second Gentleman scandal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s so funny that Democrats can’t bear to stay on the topic of Doug Emhoff and instead have to keep deflecting. Very telling.

There’s nothing “on the topic” to stay on. What’s interesting here is that Republicans want to discuss a 20 year old affair— and not their candidate for President. Isn’t the old orange guy amazing? It’s weird that you don’t want to talk about him.

[Anonymous]

The hypocrisy on this forum is incredible but predictable. Yes, no one should care about the personal life of a politician or his/her spouse. But that's not the point, is it? The point is that Dems, including Biden and Harris and probably most of you on this forum, were on your high horses for months and maybe more than a year about Trump's one-nighter with Stormy. You secretly loved it while you publicly clutched your pearls and made mean girl comments about Melania. So now, the Trump supporters are going to bring the karma home to you. And if you want to get technical, the Emhoff situation is far worse because it was an ongoing affair with a trusted person in the household, resulting in a baby. So maybe Kamala shouldn't have said so smuggly on Kimmel, "Cheaters don't like to get caught", when she knew her own husband was just such a cheater (and frankly, she was too, with another woman's husband for years). And when we eventually find out that the 2020 Biden Harris campaign paid legal fees or PR firms to cover this up or maybe even paid out "hush money" (the nanny bought a nice house in the Hamptons in 2021...so that's New York), I hope you'll be outraged and just as energized about felony charges for Harris for violating federal campaign finance laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:why isn't the media talking about that Harris wasn't a virgin when she got married? She had so many boyfriends

Amazing posters like this are able to vote in elections

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like a nothingburger. Biden’s team were aware of this in 2020.

A baby is not a nothingburger. I know the left likes to think so but it ain’t so

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does take responsibility mean?

He hasn’t been a father to the child.

Was the child terminated in utero, or was there a payoff to pretend it never happened and leave the child without its fathers name or love?

Who cares? This a pro-abortion candidate, no one cares if she aborted her child or her husband aborted nanny’s child, or they placed the baby for adopt… it has zero impact on Harris’s platform.

A lot of feminists would care about a man taking advantage of a young woman in his employ

No doubt, but they would probably be more concerned about voting for a man who has had at least 26 women accuse him of sexual misconduct.
https://www.businessinsider.com/women-accused-trump-sexual-misconduct-list-2017-12#karen-johnson-12

You think this is the only time Doug has been a creep? Oh, sweetie.

Lest we forget when he locked lips with Dr. Biden at SOTU. Bad judgment on display.

…..Never to be unseen.

🤮
Who made the lips move there - Jill or Doug?

What can be unburdened…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The hypocrisy on this forum is incredible but predictable. Yes, no one should care about the personal life of a politician or his/her spouse. But that's not the point, is it? The point is that Dems, including Biden and Harris and probably most of you on this forum, were on your high horses for months and maybe more than a year about Trump's one-nighter with Stormy. You secretly loved it while you publicly clutched your pearls and made mean girl comments about Melania. So now, the Trump supporters are going to bring the karma home to you. And if you want to get technical, the Emhoff situation is far worse because it was an ongoing affair with a trusted person in the household, resulting in a baby. So maybe Kamala shouldn't have said so smuggly on Kimmel, "Cheaters don't like to get caught", when she knew her own husband was just such a cheater (and frankly, she was too, with another woman's husband for years). And when we eventually find out that the 2020 Biden Harris campaign paid legal fees or PR firms to cover this up or maybe even paid out "hush money" (the nanny bought a nice house in the Hamptons in 2021...so that's New York), I hope you'll be outraged and just as energized about felony charges for Harris for violating federal campaign finance laws.

Kamala was talking about Doug when she was talking about cheaters. I am sire she gave him that hyenas laugh when she got home after Kimmel’s show.

[Anonymous]

I was never on my high horse because I don't give a damn about a president's personal life. If it's consensual and between two adults you do you honey. I do not care. I don't care that Trump has sex with pornstars. Great. Enjoy it. Just own it. Don't care that Doug cheated on an ex-wife who cares. I wouldn't care if they had an open marriage. Just own it. Nothing is being talked about because literally no one cares about a 20-year-old affair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The hypocrisy on this forum is incredible but predictable. Yes, no one should care about the personal life of a politician or his/her spouse. But that's not the point, is it? The point is that Dems, including Biden and Harris and probably most of you on this forum, were on your high horses for months and maybe more than a year about Trump's one-nighter with Stormy. You secretly loved it while you publicly clutched your pearls and made mean girl comments about Melania. So now, the Trump supporters are going to bring the karma home to you. And if you want to get technical, the Emhoff situation is far worse because it was an ongoing affair with a trusted person in the household, resulting in a baby. So maybe Kamala shouldn't have said so smuggly on Kimmel, "Cheaters don't like to get caught", when she knew her own husband was just such a cheater (and frankly, she was too, with another woman's husband for years). And when we eventually find out that the 2020 Biden Harris campaign paid legal fees or PR firms to cover this up or maybe even paid out "hush money" (the nanny bought a nice house in the Hamptons in 2021...so that's New York), I hope you'll be outraged and just as energized about felony charges for Harris for violating federal campaign finance laws.

I never cared about Stormy or Melania or whatever. I cared that tfg was grifting his way through the presidency.

I did care that he was a rapist because my 12 year old daughter asked me about that and asked me how a man who rapes someone can be president and run for president. True story!!!

That was a fun conversation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This statement covers it for me. I hope both Harris and Emhoff refuse to speak about this any further.

I guess that's one way to spin it. I think this affair is mostly a nonissue for the campaign - although sleeping with an employee is troubling - but this statement ain't it, fam. He came out stronger on the other side, with his ex-wife...through divorce? What a strange spin to attempt.

Look, the Dem base will support Harris no matter what comes to light, and in that way her candidacy is not much different than MAGA's demagogue candidate. As this thread alone shows, no supporter will hear a bad word said about their preferred candidate, no matter what comes to light.

[Anonymous]

Emhoff isn't the candidate, Harris is.
These events took place long before the two met.

Total non-issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This statement covers it for me. I hope both Harris and Emhoff refuse to speak about this any further.

I guess that's one way to spin it. I think this affair is mostly a nonissue for the campaign - although sleeping with an employee is troubling - but this statement ain't it, fam. He came out stronger on the other side, with his ex-wife...through divorce? What a strange spin to attempt.

Look, the Dem base will support Harris no matter what comes to light, and in that way her candidacy is not much different than MAGA's demagogue candidate. As this thread alone shows, no supporter will hear a bad word said about their preferred candidate, no matter what comes to light.

But how does this reflect on the candidate… at all? It happened a really long time before she even met her husband. Why is a woman responsible for a man being a hound dog?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like a nothingburger. Biden’s team were aware of this in 2020.

A baby is not a nothingburger. I know the left likes to think so but it ain’t so

Where is the evidence of the ”baby”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The hypocrisy on this forum is incredible but predictable. Yes, no one should care about the personal life of a politician or his/her spouse. But that's not the point, is it? The point is that Dems, including Biden and Harris and probably most of you on this forum, were on your high horses for months and maybe more than a year about Trump's one-nighter with Stormy. You secretly loved it while you publicly clutched your pearls and made mean girl comments about Melania. So now, the Trump supporters are going to bring the karma home to you. And if you want to get technical, the Emhoff situation is far worse because it was an ongoing affair with a trusted person in the household, resulting in a baby. So maybe Kamala shouldn't have said so smuggly on Kimmel, "Cheaters don't like to get caught", when she knew her own husband was just such a cheater (and frankly, she was too, with another woman's husband for years). And when we eventually find out that the 2020 Biden Harris campaign paid legal fees or PR firms to cover this up or maybe even paid out "hush money" (the nanny bought a nice house in the Hamptons in 2021...so that's New York), I hope you'll be outraged and just as energized about felony charges for Harris for violating federal campaign finance laws.

Wow.

Trump is a Presidential candidate who committed a crime paying off Daniel’s.

Emhoff is the vice presidents spouse who cheated on his ex wife 20 years ago and there’s literally no evidence of this “baby”.

So no I’m afraid there isn’t a credible parallel.

In HRC you got a parallel because she defended Bill, but here? You’ve got….nothing.

[Anonymous]

They are all crooks. All that matters is how unhinged they are - Harris is way less unhinged and unpredictable than Trump. Is he a nice person? No. Is her circle a bunch of nice people? No. Nice people don’t rise to the top. Reserve the niceness criteria for neighbors and such.

[Anonymous]

Boohoo hoo why don't Democrats take ownership? Oh, he did boohoo who why don't you care about an affair that happened 20 years ago? Boohoo who? Why aren't you upset even though the party's involved are not upset? Boohoo hoo.