The best information we have to go on is what he did during his term in power. |
In Trump's own platform he seems not to think of it as a state issue as the language states: "We will oppose Late Term Abortion" That language indicates they will pursue overriding state law when they disagree with it. Note that Trump's own platform does not give any language about life or health of the mother, rape, incest, fatal abnormalities, etc. |
Exactly, they work for him. :roll: |
Says the person who knows nothing about pregnancy. FYI, people who WANT to be pregnant also NEED abortions sometimes. |
Thank you. The absolute nuttery displayed on this thread (and so many others) is staggering. But then I remember this is just how a tiny group of LWNJs thinks and is thankfully not representative of the country as a whole. |
Definitely. Forced birthers are clueless about actual birthing. Just keep them away from this private matter. |
That's right. He's a serial liar. Nothing he communicates can or should be trusted. We now have eight years of experience there. |
The language of Trump's own platform indicates an intent to override state laws if they allow late term abortion; his platform does not list any exceptions such as life/health of mother. If Trump is not a risk to state-decided abortion rights, well, he has a poor way of wording it in his platform. "After 51 years, because of us, that power has been given to the States and to a vote of the People. We will oppose Late Term Abortion, while supporting mothers and policies that advance Prenatal Care, access to Birth Control, and IVF (fertility treatments)" |
Exactly what I asked for— why the “most current” version of his position on the issue should be considered more truthful than the statements he made as President (20 week ban) or in March of this year (15 week ban). If his thinking has changed and he suddenly supports women’s rights he hasn’t said so. All we can conclude is he is lying in at least two of the above instances. |
Interesting that he thinks he can take on IVF. I thought that was now a "states right" issue. What are we to take as truth from that garbled, inconsistent "official platform"? |
To be clear, medication that stops the heart is given first, and to be clear, if it is threatening my life and ability to mother my two existing children, yes I would proceed with a late term abortion without hesitation. And yes over a c section which is more invasive and carries higher risk. And lastly to be clear, if the fetus carries a fatal abnormality, I would rather this procedure than being forced to carry to term. Screw you and your dictator tendencies toward what women decide with their bodies. |
LOL, he can propose it but the House of Representatives writes the tax laws and that will never happen. |
I'm pretty sure he'll come for everyone's guns as part of the shift to an autocracy. |
So it’s either what’s stated on his campaign website as of today, or your stalwart belief that he’s lying. I know which one I’m going with. |
Sounds good, go with it. Trump needs marks like you to have a chance. |