
The misgendering post demonstrates who is really posting here. |
PP again. I also wanted to add that if we had chosen inaction, she would have continued to develop the masculine features which were causing her so much distress. And that would have made it harder for her to pass and be seen as a woman in the world. Regardless of whether individual people perceive trans women as "real" women or not, the reality is that you are treated as people see you. And when they see my daughter, most people see a slender not too tall girl with long pretty hair. If we had chosen inaction, she later would have had to endure a lot more painful hair removal and possible facial surgeries. So, it is ironic to bemoan the idea that she would be on HRT but not that if she hadn't been she would likely have many more invasive interventions later--without any parental love or support. |
I’m sorry and hope you both do well. |
You misgendered her kid. WTF are you expecting in response? |
She’s doing great. She’s going to a great college. She has friends. Still quirky! But happy! It’s no tragedy. My kid is alive and well. The packaging is just a little different. But thank you! ![]() |
I’m the PP who just talked about her kid. It wasn’t me who cursed. That was someone else. I did point out the OBVIOUS bigotry that I think was removed. |
I’m replying to the person who replied to you. Have a good one! |
Both. People with mental illness deserve treatment that helps them get better. |
Precisely. Men are free to wear makeup and listen show-tunes. Women and girls are free to shave their heads and enjoy wood-working. What’s negative is confusing stereotypes and biological sex and misleading a child that they “transition” their sex, which is not humanly possible. |
Man = adult human male Woman = adult human female |
I’m an atheist. I don’t think trans people are crazy. They usually fall into three categories 1) gender dysphoric young people 2) confused children and 3) sexual fetishists. I know and like people who are types 1 and 2. I don’t care for type 3, who coincidentally (or not) are most of the people running the trans movement in western societies. |
I don’t care about trans adults any more or less than any other adults. If people want to have elective cosmetic surgeries, they can do so. I do care about children being brainwashed by nonsense. |
I have been fighting for women and girls in sports for my entire adult life. |
Forget what? That men and boys have male sexual parts and women have female sexual parts? Weird how pointing out basic biology is considered bigotry. |
I am the PP who pointed out the mountain of data analysis flaws in that ludicrous letter that Andrew Wakefield signed. For context, I haven’t posted since then. I am not OP.
I appreciate the insight from the mom of the trans daughter. PP, I appreciate you taking the time. Your post was thoughtful and I think your perspective is valuable. But why do you assume that people who have dug into the data and come away with a starkly different opinion than you are doing that without a personal stake, for entirely transphobic reasons? I find that a little insulting and reductive, to be honest, as though if you love a child struggling with gender dysphoria you must ignore the gaping chasm of reliable data and fully embrace the affirmative model of care, no questions asked, because not being “transphobic” is more important than having hard discussions about medical treatment. The truth is that I came to this specifically because a child I’ve known nearly his whole life suddenly started expressing gender dysphoria, after having been diagnosed with severe depression and an eating disorder following serious bullying at school. He is not some anonymous number for me. His parents did what good parents were told to do when a child expresses gender dysphoria: they affirmed and took him (at that point, socially her) to a gender clinic. And that’s where things turned nightmarish. He and his parents experienced significant pressure to continue down a medical pathway to transition, largely ignoring the confounding and severe mental health issues as well as the bullying. The parents were essentially threatened with the suicide of their child (told the dead son/live daughter line multiple times), and it was made clear that if they did not go along for the ride, that ride would continue without them. That’s where I came into this, because my background is data and the mom wanted to discuss the available data because they felt so pressured. Of course, as we all know now thanks to the Cass report, not only is the science not remotely settled, it barely qualifies as science. I went through a good number of the studies cited by WPATH and I was horrified. The lack of rigor was immediately apparent. I was honestly super confused; I had, up to that point, assumed that there was significant evidentiary support. I had (foolishly) trusted the medical system. But I could not avoid the truth before my eyes. That child did not transition and is now doing well. The family remains close. I do not want to share more because this is not my story. But the experience of this child is as important as that of your own trans child, PP. Your desire to protect your child is as strong as the desire of this child’s parents to protect him. And this unquestioning model did not serve them at all, in fact it was extremely destructive. Your desire to support your own child can’t come at the expense of other children. That is as wrong as the care bans are. You can’t shut down all discussion because the medical pathway worked for your daughter; if that is in fact the best path for some children, there needs to be evidence to support that path. I am deeply aware that the discussion must be painful for you, but not having the discussion is as painful to other families. For years, “no discussion” has prevailed as a model. It is time for other voices to be heard. |