NY Mag piece on K admissions
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Stop it right there! I bet you’re not even a New Yorker! Don’t tell people that have a different opinion on politics they may not belong here. Diversity is New York. You’re free to not like it or fight against it but we’re not gonna have some cookie cutter town because people are getting shamed over their ideas |
Anonymous
I read it not as telling you you don’t belong but rather that you’re often not gonna be happy in NYC if you’re MAGA, which in light of your complaining about the schools and “LWNJ” seems fair. Relax there bud. |
Anonymous
Thank you. Exactly. They kind of proved my point. New Yorkers embrace diversity. But people who blindly trot out ignorant Fox News Propaganda speak are not embracing diversity. They blindly engaging in group think that is based in hatred of people different than themselves (and blaming these people for all of the world's problems), which runs counter to everything NYC stands for. I loved having political discussions with true, old school conservatives. Our views might have varied a lot, but I could see where they were coming from. MAGA is far from that. I feel kind of bad for my old Republican friends because they morally can't stand Trump, but the Democratic party is pretty far from what they want also. |
Anonymous
LWNJ? Maybe the city isn’t for you. |
Anonymous
That is how I initially read it, but I can see it in three ways and not sure what the writer (or Sara herself) intended. First, a simple juxtaposition between not getting aid and having a second home, underscoring the ridiculousness of this person's thinking. In this case the not getting financial aid doesn't have a logical connection to the sentence about the second home. Second, she is trying to explain away why they appear wealthy but actually need financial aid. The important word here being "luck"--due to a family inheritance or something--i.e., they don't have cash flow but they happen to have a second home. Third, she views herself as a lucky that she has another option of where to live and find a better school situation since NYC didn't work out. |
Anonymous
|
It's just sensation. Makes for good reading. And also a natural follow up to the Bloomberg article last month about $70,000 tuition... if that article hadn't gotten so much attention, this article never would have been written.
Was it very competitive this year? Yes. Is it very competitive every year? Yes. Keep in mind, that by the author's own admission, these private schools don't publish statistics, so it's anyone's guess what the real numbers looked like. And just because you can drum up a few rejection stories doesn't make it true. |
Anonymous
A few schools (I know Packer is one) have publicly rated debt so there are rating agency reports about them. They give acceptance rates and some other stats. Acceptance rates are at all entry points so not very meaningful, but it is interesting to see. |
Anonymous
We had a call with someone from Parents League who said that applications were up 25% due to COVID baby boom and uncertainty around the new mayor. The article was definitely very bombastic but I do think it's going back to pre-COVID levels of competition, which had dropped off with families leaving the city during COVID. |
Anonymous
Live birth data published by NY State Department of Health does not seem to support the hypothesis of “Covid baby boom”. Numbers of live births in NYC: 2020 - 94,857, 2021 - 92,523, 2022 - 92,094. https://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/vital_statistics/2020/table09.htm https://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/vital_statistics/2021/table09.htm https://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/vital_statistics/2022/table09.htm |
Anonymous
You do realize New York City attracts people from other countries and states right? So the NYS birth rate does not prove anything |
Anonymous
Agree with this. Also just talking to my PSD who said admissions was absolutely crazy this year in comparison to even last year. Last year multiple kids got more than one offer, this year only one kid got two offers, everyone else got one offer and even one kid got completely waitlisted everywhere. This wasn’t the case last year. I think people in it now don’t realize how competitive getting in to K was pre-COVID. After Covid admissions dropped in all private schools. Admissions is now slowly climbing back up and even though this year was s “bloodbath” just wait for next year and the next following few years. |
Anonymous
I "realize" that over past 2-3 years the growth in NYC population has been minimal. There was no sudden influx of rich parents with young kids who all decided to apply for private K this year. What is true is that more and more New Yorkers are choosing private schools over public (regardless of the sky high price tag). Total NYC public school enrollment keeps falling. |
Anonymous
It is absolutely true. And if the family has a hook, they will never counsel out that kid, regardless of how wild he is (or how shitty his parents are). Sad, but true. The "new" (she has been there for a few years) Director of Admissions is ruining the school with her bad decisions. |
Anonymous
I know of what I speak. NYC public schools should be for everyone. Spare me your ignorance. |
Anonymous
You seem deranged. Do you know how non deterministic it is to pick four year olds who may or may not go on to “succeed”? So many of these kids never turn out the way their parents thought they would at age four. - crusty old TT alum |