Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan New York City
Reply to "NY Mag piece on K admissions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The "no aid but they have a second home" part was priceless. Some people are so oblivious.[/quote] That is how I initially read it, but I can see it in three ways and not sure what the writer (or Sara herself) intended. First, a simple juxtaposition between not getting aid and having a second home, underscoring the ridiculousness of this person's thinking. In this case the not getting financial aid doesn't have a logical connection to the sentence about the second home. Second, she is trying to explain away why they appear wealthy but actually need financial aid. The important word here being "luck"--due to a family inheritance or something--i.e., they don't have cash flow but they happen to have a second home. Third, she views herself as a lucky that she has another option of where to live and find a better school situation since NYC didn't work out.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics