You write that the ASD diagnosis is the culprit. I am inviting you to check your biases. What is the culprit is ableism. Both yours and some of the schools you are trying to squeeze your kid into. You need to work on a accepting your kids diagnosis |
OP has accepted the child's diagnosis just fine. That is not what OP is saying. Private schools accepting ASD diagnosis is a different matter. Ableism is legal and common in private schools, and OP is just working with the reality. |
Yes, thank you. We are just looking for the best possible education and environment for our kid and discovering the reality of private schools. Our kid was diagnosed 8 years ago and we have accepted his diagnosis and are proud of him. |
+1 private schools definitely do not have the resources. Whether or not they have the desire is moot. McLean is a perfect example of a school that understands just how many resources can be needed for one diagnosis and is open about not being able to support others. Another poster sent a child to Field and later regretted it. This outcome is arguably worse for all than Field being realistic about its ability to support a student. |
|
OP’s son has social deficits. Quote: “ DS struggles figuring out some social norms”, yet the OP applied to schools well known to not provide social support.
Did your advisor recommend any schools that can support your son in his areas of struggle? Have you researched Templeton, Sycamore, Newton, or Parkmont? Send your kid to a school that will be proud of having him! A school that only tolerates students on the spectrum as long as they don’t act or look autistic is not a good fit. Start by getting a new advisor, OP! |
I'm the pp who regrets sending my kid to field and I completely agree with the bolded. One of the reasons that I'm upset at field is that they promised us specific accommodations and support -- we shared the neuropsych and IEP and discussed it in detail -- and then failed to live up to their promises. A rejection would have been much better. |
This is terrible advice. Not disclosing can lead to a situation where the kid is asked to leave. Much better to be transparent upfront and be rejected than to be asked to leave later on. |
I'd add Fusion, Oakwood, Commonwealth, Linder, Lab |
Not Lab. They don't accept autistic students. I'd add Sycamore to this list. |
This comports with my experience as well (albeit not at Deal). For kids on the spectrum who are on track academically, DCPS works. |
Depends what you mean by “quirky” and “struggling to figure out social norms.” |
+1. I get really REALLY annoyed at all the mainstream private school parents who claim “oh, 50% of the kids at our Big3 are neurodivergent! It will be fine! So common!” It’s just totally false. While there may be a small cohort of actually autistic kids at top privates, they’re mostly likely very mildly affected and never had behavioral issues, and were accepted prior to the diagnosis. The rest are all extremely mild ADHD or “ADHD.” Kids like mine (and possibly OP’s) who are gifted but visibly spectrumy even if not disruptive (stimming, prosody, eye contact differences, etc) will not get past an interview. |
conversely, Lab is a school for language disorders and many kids on the spectrum are adept with language and would be poorly served at Lab. |
Agreed. I have one AuDHD kid at a SN school who would never be successful in a mainstream private school because their support needs -- EF, social, academic -- are too high, and an ADHD kid who is thriving in such a school because all they need is basic accommodations. Picking a school means being ruthlessly honest, with yourself and any prospective school, about your child's needs. |
You keep saying lightweight but as someone else said an IEP is not lightweight, a 504 is. Keep him in a public school where they have to legally accommodate him. Or apply to lab. |