Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if the impeachment hearings will be broadcasted on any radio stations? Will be on the road a bit tomorrow, and am looking for some entertainment on the road.

where will you be? Good chance that WAMU will carry the live broadcast. Does C-Span still have the old UDC station? If so, might be carried there.

sure someone will livestream it - fairly sure WNYC (93.9) will do if you have the TuneIn Radio app.

WAMU said they would.

[Anonymous]

Hearings next week:
Tuesday: Alexander Vindman, Jennifer Williams from Pence’s office, Kurt Volker, and Tim Morrison
Wednesday: Gordon Sondland, Laura Cooper, David Hale
Thursday: Fiona Hill

[Anonymous]

Perfect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if the impeachment hearings will be broadcasted on any radio stations? Will be on the road a bit tomorrow, and am looking for some entertainment on the road.

where will you be? Good chance that WAMU will carry the live broadcast. Does C-Span still have the old UDC station? If so, might be carried there.

sure someone will livestream it - fairly sure WNYC (93.9) will do if you have the TuneIn Radio app.

WAMU said they would.

Thanks, pps!

[Anonymous]

So do the Dems add the Stone/Wikileaks/Trump Lied thing to any impeachment counts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Perfect.

That's just silly.

If you don't think there's enough evidence to prove someone guilty, you shouldn't be bringing them to trial.

The House was gathering evidence (in private) to see if it was enough. and this next part isn't even a trial, yet. that comes in the Senate.

Doesn't the New York Post know that?

(also, Trump is guilty as sin and everyone knows it. He used the power of his office to bribe and extort a head of state for his own personal political gain. He's obstructed justice every which way from Sunday.

He is unfit for office. You know it, I know it, the NYPost knows it.

[Anonymous]

^^^ The impeachment inquiry hasn't even been one tenth of the clown show that the Trump administration has been.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perfect.

That's just silly.

If you don't think there's enough evidence to prove someone guilty, you shouldn't be bringing them to trial.

The House was gathering evidence (in private) to see if it was enough. and this next part isn't even a trial, yet. that comes in the Senate.

Doesn't the New York Post know that?

(also, Trump is guilty as sin and everyone knows it. He used the power of his office to bribe and extort a head of state for his own personal political gain. He's obstructed justice every which way from Sunday.

He is unfit for office. You know it, I know it, the NYPost knows it.

Pelosi caved to the far left.
That will become more evident with time.......

[Anonymous]

^^^^ hasn't read the depositions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^^ hasn't read the depositions

Yeah, I have. Opinions don't count when it comes to evidence, pp.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^^ hasn't read the depositions

Yeah, I have. Opinions don't count when it comes to evidence, pp.

Witness statements are evidence. As are public statements contrary to interest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perfect.

That's just silly.

If you don't think there's enough evidence to prove someone guilty, you shouldn't be bringing them to trial.

The House was gathering evidence (in private) to see if it was enough. and this next part isn't even a trial, yet. that comes in the Senate.

Doesn't the New York Post know that?

(also, Trump is guilty as sin and everyone knows it. He used the power of his office to bribe and extort a head of state for his own personal political gain. He's obstructed justice every which way from Sunday.

He is unfit for office. You know it, I know it, the NYPost knows it.

Pelosi caved to the far left.
That will become more evident with time.......

No, it will never become evident. Disagree with her if you wish, but she is a big girl and makes her own decisions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Perfect.

That's just silly.

If you don't think there's enough evidence to prove someone guilty, you shouldn't be bringing them to trial.

The House was gathering evidence (in private) to see if it was enough. and this next part isn't even a trial, yet. that comes in the Senate.

Doesn't the New York Post know that?

(also, Trump is guilty as sin and everyone knows it. He used the power of his office to bribe and extort a head of state for his own personal political gain. He's obstructed justice every which way from Sunday.

He is unfit for office. You know it, I know it, the NYPost knows it.

Pelosi caved to the far left.
That will become more evident with time.......

Pelosi caved because Trump wouldn’t stop committing crimes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^^ hasn't read the depositions

Yeah, I have. Opinions don't count when it comes to evidence, pp.

Oh honey, stop.

[Anonymous]

Mid-hearing, impeachment inquiry officials announce two new closed depositions.

Friday: David Holmes, an aide to Bill Taylor
Saturday: Mark Sandy, an OMB official who refused to appear last week.