Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jim Jordan is lied about the Mueller report.

It detailed:

-10 episodes of obstruction of justice
-Nearly 40 indictments
-Hundreds of lies about the Trump campaign's work with
Russia
-$32M spent, $50M recovered.

Mueller found collusion but William Barr buried it.

You are lying.

None of those four points have anything to do with collusion.

Mueller found zero collusion.

Zero.

I think I know the source of your confusion. You don't know what "collusion" means.

Well, look it up?

You have clearly not read the Mueller report for if you had, you would know that he didn't investigate "collusion."

[Anonymous]

Another good closing statement by Schiff.

[Anonymous]

Why doesn't Schiff use his dais to speak directly to Bolton, Mulvaney, Gillian and others who have ignored or defied subpoenas to urge them to testify before the committee??? That would assuage those fears that Republicans have about "hearsay."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn't Schiff use his dais to speak directly to Bolton, Mulvaney, Gillian and others who have ignored or defied subpoenas to urge them to testify before the committee??? That would assuage those fears that Republicans have about "hearsay."

He did, yesterday, several times.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Another good closing statement by Schiff.

It's a bit rambly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jim Jordan is lied about the Mueller report.

It detailed:

-10 episodes of obstruction of justice
-Nearly 40 indictments
-Hundreds of lies about the Trump campaign's work with
Russia
-$32M spent, $50M recovered.

Mueller found collusion but William Barr buried it.

You are lying.

None of those four points have anything to do with collusion.

Mueller found zero collusion.

Zero.

I think I know the source of your confusion. You don't know what "collusion" means.

Well, look it up?

They did not sign an explicit contract with Russian; if that makes you happy. However, Muller report said Trump team sought, encouraged, cooperated and coordinated with Russian election meddling.

PP is still right: No Collusion!

(Because, erm, "collusion" is not a thing in criminal law. Conspiracy, OTOH...)

Zero collusion, Zero conspiracy.

Tons of paranoia and conspiracy theories, though, instead of real interest in knowing why 8 million Obama voters chose to cross over and vote Trump.

Good luck next year folks!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Poll finds sharp swing in opposition to impeachment among independents
45 percent oppose impeaching President Trump, against 43 percent who support it. That's a 6-point swing in support from October, when 48 percent of voters supported impeachment and only 44 percent opposed.

Bad math and goalpost moving in two sentences.

And no source.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

Election interference is a valid foreign policy concern, but Trump wasn't pursuing it as a foreign policy concern. If he was, he would have used foreign policy channels and not his own personal lawyer. Instead, he froze out and actively attacked and maligned foreign policy channels.

This is literally what Dr. Hill said. She was angry with Sondland because he was freezing out the team that was supposed to implement foreign policy. She eventually realized that the reason why he was freezing them out was because he wasn't implementing foreign policy, but Trump's domestic concerns instead.

[Anonymous]

Another strong closing from Schiff I think, direct comparisons to "i'm not a crook" etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jim Jordan is lied about the Mueller report.

It detailed:

-10 episodes of obstruction of justice
-Nearly 40 indictments
-Hundreds of lies about the Trump campaign's work with
Russia
-$32M spent, $50M recovered.

Mueller found collusion but William Barr buried it.

You are lying.

None of those four points have anything to do with collusion.

Mueller found zero collusion.

Zero.

I think I know the source of your confusion. You don't know what "collusion" means.

Well, look it up?

They did not sign an explicit contract with Russian; if that makes you happy. However, Muller report said Trump team sought, encouraged, cooperated and coordinated with Russian election meddling.

PP is still right: No Collusion!

(Because, erm, "collusion" is not a thing in criminal law. Conspiracy, OTOH...)

Zero collusion, Zero conspiracy.

Tons of paranoia and conspiracy theories, though, instead of real interest in knowing why 8 million Obama voters chose to cross over and vote Trump.

Good luck next year folks!

^^^Hasn't read Mueller Report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jim Jordan is lied about the Mueller report.

It detailed:

-10 episodes of obstruction of justice
-Nearly 40 indictments
-Hundreds of lies about the Trump campaign's work with
Russia
-$32M spent, $50M recovered.

Mueller found collusion but William Barr buried it.

You are lying.

None of those four points have anything to do with collusion.

Mueller found zero collusion.

Zero.

I think I know the source of your confusion. You don't know what "collusion" means.

Well, look it up?

They did not sign an explicit contract with Russian; if that makes you happy. However, Muller report said Trump team sought, encouraged, cooperated and coordinated with Russian election meddling.

PP is still right: No Collusion!

(Because, erm, "collusion" is not a thing in criminal law. Conspiracy, OTOH...)

Zero collusion, Zero conspiracy.

Tons of paranoia and conspiracy theories, though, instead of real interest in knowing why 8 million Obama voters chose to cross over and vote Trump.

Good luck next year folks!

Go ahead and keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep at night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poll finds sharp swing in opposition to impeachment among independents
45 percent oppose impeaching President Trump, against 43 percent who support it. That's a 6-point swing in support from October, when 48 percent of voters supported impeachment and only 44 percent opposed.

Bad math and goalpost moving in two sentences.

And no source.

https://www.rollcall.com/news/new-polls-show-impeachment-hearings-having-minimal-impact-on-public-sentiment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jim Jordan is lied about the Mueller report.

It detailed:

-10 episodes of obstruction of justice
-Nearly 40 indictments
-Hundreds of lies about the Trump campaign's work with
Russia
-$32M spent, $50M recovered.

Mueller found collusion but William Barr buried it.

You are lying.

None of those four points have anything to do with collusion.

Mueller found zero collusion.

Zero.

I think I know the source of your confusion. You don't know what "collusion" means.

Well, look it up?

They did not sign an explicit contract with Russian; if that makes you happy. However, Muller report said Trump team sought, encouraged, cooperated and coordinated with Russian election meddling.

PP is still right: No Collusion!

(Because, erm, "collusion" is not a thing in criminal law. Conspiracy, OTOH...)

Zero collusion, Zero conspiracy.

Tons of paranoia and conspiracy theories, though, instead of real interest in knowing why 8 million Obama voters chose to cross over and vote Trump.

Good luck next year folks!

This is why no one went to prison. Oh wait...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No republican smart enough but hill says Trump pursues domestic political concerns.

How is election interference not a valid foreign policy objective - they are letting her - hill- parse it as a domestics poltical concern

Hill is smart enough to explain it to you. If you're dumb enough to ask her.

No, she’s not. Foreign election meddling is a valid foreign policy concern.

Dr. Hill has made clear to everyone that there was no Ukrainian interference in our election. An op-ed is not “interference.”

That’s her opinion.

I am saying as subject matter it is valid foreign policy concern. The president is not bound to shape his foreign policy in accordance with hill’s opinions.

This.
Election interference is a valid foreign policy concern, but Trump wasn't pursuing it as a foreign policy concern. If he was, he would have used foreign policy channels and not his own personal lawyer. Instead, he froze out and actively attacked and maligned foreign policy channels.

This is literally what Dr. Hill said. She was angry with Sondland because he was freezing out the team that was supposed to implement foreign policy. She eventually realized that the reason why he was freezing them out was because he wasn't implementing foreign policy, but Trump's domestic concerns instead.

[Anonymous]

The Dems should have called Hill when they were investigating Russia earlier. She said their goal was to sow dissent. Putin has succeeded beyond his wildest dreams. And, Adam Schiff is the prime example of Putin's successful endeavor.