GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What will the spin be when it turns out there were a half dozen other people there with them working on previous RICO cases?

LOL. In the middle of the night? Sure.
Especially since Wade had NEVER worked on a RICO case.

Have you SEEN some of the people she's gone after? People like "Young Thug" and "Gunna" and "Yak Gotti" and "Psycho" etc

She probably wore prosthetic noses to the grocery store

LOL. Nice try.
Problem is..... Wade wasn't yet hired during that time frame.
In your fantasy scenario.... why was he there?

Irrelevant because no financial benefit has been established

That is not true. It has been alleged that he paid for 5 trips for her. He was able to produce a single receipt to show that she ever paid anything for the two of them. One receipt.
And, then she claims that she paid him back in cash. He said he charged on his credit card because she would limit her transactions "for safety reasons." Whatever the hell that means. Whereas Fani claimed he paid on his credit card because he was a "world traveler" and knew how to plan these things.
Two different responses. A bit of a conflict right there.
Did she pay him back in cash? That is something the judge will have to decide.

And, still...... if they were having an affair before she hired him, they have both lied under oath.

Prosecutors that pursue the really, really bad guys have to watch their backs. Think about the witness protection programs for people involved in singular cases. Now think about the district attorneys that go after these people year after year. Lots of reasons for her to be worried over her safety. And that was just when dealing with thugs who wear shiny golden teeth! Her profession is to pursue people who will do anything to anybody until they are stopped. I, for one, am glad people like her have the balls to do the work.

You are really reaching to make excuses for Fani.
Why didn't SHE use that excuse to explain why Wade made the charges on his card? She loves to play the victim. This presented the perfect opportunity.

Sister, I am presuming she is not guilty of any accusations until sufficient evidence is provided to prove she is guilty. You seem to be presuming guilt with the idea that she needs to prove she is not guilty. Headlines from newspapers (which unlike courts can retract their claims later) seem to be enough for you. That isn't how it works. Presumption of innocence is bedrock here in America. Don't like it? You are free to leave.

I am basing my opinion on the the 2 days of testimony. I watched all of it. She did not come across as credible and Wade was even worse.
And, I recall hearing somewhere around here that if someone is accused of something, but there is no trial.... just a hearing..... that presumption of innocence doesn't apply.
Yes, I vividly remember many people here making that argument in Sept - Oct. 2018.

You sound like my mother. Whenever I debunked her accusations she came after my for my tone of voice and demeanor.

Whatever

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What will the spin be when it turns out there were a half dozen other people there with them working on previous RICO cases?

LOL. In the middle of the night? Sure.
Especially since Wade had NEVER worked on a RICO case.

Have you SEEN some of the people she's gone after? People like "Young Thug" and "Gunna" and "Yak Gotti" and "Psycho" etc

She probably wore prosthetic noses to the grocery store

LOL. Nice try.
Problem is..... Wade wasn't yet hired during that time frame.
In your fantasy scenario.... why was he there?

Irrelevant because no financial benefit has been established

That is not true. It has been alleged that he paid for 5 trips for her. He was able to produce a single receipt to show that she ever paid anything for the two of them. One receipt.
And, then she claims that she paid him back in cash. He said he charged on his credit card because she would limit her transactions "for safety reasons." Whatever the hell that means. Whereas Fani claimed he paid on his credit card because he was a "world traveler" and knew how to plan these things.
Two different responses. A bit of a conflict right there.
Did she pay him back in cash? That is something the judge will have to decide.

And, still...... if they were having an affair before she hired him, they have both lied under oath.

Prosecutors that pursue the really, really bad guys have to watch their backs. Think about the witness protection programs for people involved in singular cases. Now think about the district attorneys that go after these people year after year. Lots of reasons for her to be worried over her safety. And that was just when dealing with thugs who wear shiny golden teeth! Her profession is to pursue people who will do anything to anybody until they are stopped. I, for one, am glad people like her have the balls to do the work.

You are really reaching to make excuses for Fani.
Why didn't SHE use that excuse to explain why Wade made the charges on his card? She loves to play the victim. This presented the perfect opportunity.

Sister, I am presuming she is not guilty of any accusations until sufficient evidence is provided to prove she is guilty. You seem to be presuming guilt with the idea that she needs to prove she is not guilty. Headlines from newspapers (which unlike courts can retract their claims later) seem to be enough for you. That isn't how it works. Presumption of innocence is bedrock here in America. Don't like it? You are free to leave.

I am basing my opinion on the the 2 days of testimony. I watched all of it. She did not come across as credible and Wade was even worse.
And, I recall hearing somewhere around here that if someone is accused of something, but there is no trial.... just a hearing..... that presumption of innocence doesn't apply.
Yes, I vividly remember many people here making that argument in Sept - Oct. 2018.

You sound like my mother. Whenever I debunked her accusations she came after my for my tone of voice and demeanor.

Whatever

Sounds like your mom may have a point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

If she has such a strong case, then she should allow another prosecutor to take over and take this entire sordid affair off the front page. The case is far more important than the prosecutor who pursues it.

But she won't because she has staked her entire career (and political future) on being the prosecutor of THIS case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

If she has such a strong case, then she should allow another prosecutor to take over and take this entire sordid affair off the front page. The case is far more important than the prosecutor who pursues it.

But she won't because she has staked her entire career (and political future) on being the prosecutor of THIS case.

No other prosecutor is willing to touch this case.

Such a shocking lack of spine in so many people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

If she has such a strong case, then she should allow another prosecutor to take over and take this entire sordid affair off the front page. The case is far more important than the prosecutor who pursues it.

But she won't because she has staked her entire career (and political future) on being the prosecutor of THIS case.

No other prosecutor is willing to touch this case.

Such a shocking lack of spine in so many people.

Methinks there is another reason....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

If she has such a strong case, then she should allow another prosecutor to take over and take this entire sordid affair off the front page. The case is far more important than the prosecutor who pursues it.

But she won't because she has staked her entire career (and political future) on being the prosecutor of THIS case.

No other prosecutor is willing to touch this case.

Such a shocking lack of spine in so many people.

Methinks there is another reason....

Agree with you there. Perhaps the case isn't as "strong" as some think it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

If she has such a strong case, then she should allow another prosecutor to take over and take this entire sordid affair off the front page. The case is far more important than the prosecutor who pursues it.

But she won't because she has staked her entire career (and political future) on being the prosecutor of THIS case.

No other prosecutor is willing to touch this case.

Such a shocking lack of spine in so many people.

Methinks there is another reason....

Agree with you there. Perhaps the case isn't as "strong" as some think it is.

Most people are just too scared of him. Even other people in the party. Actual, visceral fear for their safety and wellbeing. It has taken someone who has stared down the worst kind of street scum to pursue this case. We were all happy when Willis was burying gangster rappers just a year or two ago. And now you want to put her out of business?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

If she has such a strong case, then she should allow another prosecutor to take over and take this entire sordid affair off the front page. The case is far more important than the prosecutor who pursues it.

But she won't because she has staked her entire career (and political future) on being the prosecutor of THIS case.

No other prosecutor is willing to touch this case.

Such a shocking lack of spine in so many people.

Methinks there is another reason....

Did you watch all of the testimony? There was the other lawyer who was asked to be a special prosecutor but declined - because he had a law firm and associates to think of, needed to continue to receive work instead of becoming a pariah for going after Trump.

Smart of him, maybe, but gutless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

If she has such a strong case, then she should allow another prosecutor to take over and take this entire sordid affair off the front page. The case is far more important than the prosecutor who pursues it.

But she won't because she has staked her entire career (and political future) on being the prosecutor of THIS case.

No other prosecutor is willing to touch this case.

Such a shocking lack of spine in so many people.

Methinks there is another reason....

Did you watch all of the testimony? There was the other lawyer who was asked to be a special prosecutor but declined - because he had a law firm and associates to think of, needed to continue to receive work instead of becoming a pariah for going after Trump.

Smart of him, maybe, but gutless.

Or maybe they think the charges are ridiculous and reputable attorneys don't agree with what Fani has done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

If she has such a strong case, then she should allow another prosecutor to take over and take this entire sordid affair off the front page. The case is far more important than the prosecutor who pursues it.

But she won't because she has staked her entire career (and political future) on being the prosecutor of THIS case.

No other prosecutor is willing to touch this case.

Such a shocking lack of spine in so many people.

Methinks there is another reason....

Did you watch all of the testimony? There was the other lawyer who was asked to be a special prosecutor but declined - because he had a law firm and associates to think of, needed to continue to receive work instead of becoming a pariah for going after Trump.

Smart of him, maybe, but gutless.

Or maybe they think the charges are ridiculous and reputable attorneys don't agree with what Fani has done.

Maybe if you say it enough times, you'll convince yourself. You won't convince anyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

If she has such a strong case, then she should allow another prosecutor to take over and take this entire sordid affair off the front page. The case is far more important than the prosecutor who pursues it.

But she won't because she has staked her entire career (and political future) on being the prosecutor of THIS case.

No other prosecutor is willing to touch this case.

Such a shocking lack of spine in so many people.

Methinks there is another reason....

Agree with you there. Perhaps the case isn't as "strong" as some think it is.

Most people are just too scared of him. Even other people in the party. Actual, visceral fear for their safety and wellbeing. It has taken someone who has stared down the worst kind of street scum to pursue this case. We were all happy when Willis was burying gangster rappers just a year or two ago. And now you want to put her out of business?

I've always admired her and wished her well with the prosecution of this case. Wish she hadn't been so foolish. Donna Brazile called it when she said Fani "showed bad judgment."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1


This whole thing is a ruse to deflect from the crime conspiracy to steal the 2020 election case.

sadly, all of these morons on the right are buying the lies again

I would think morons on the left would want the best lawyers working on the case, and not someone with no experience hired because he was sleeping with the DA.

They got a lot of indictments and several guilty pleas and defeated the motions to move the case so they are already way more effective than any Republican special counsel or investigator or prosecutor.

Exactly. And she’s got a strong case. This is a desperate play by the defense.

If she has such a strong case, then she should allow another prosecutor to take over and take this entire sordid affair off the front page. The case is far more important than the prosecutor who pursues it.

But she won't because she has staked her entire career (and political future) on being the prosecutor of THIS case.

No other prosecutor is willing to touch this case.

Such a shocking lack of spine in so many people.

Methinks there is another reason....

Agree with you there. Perhaps the case isn't as "strong" as some think it is.

Most people are just too scared of him. Even other people in the party. Actual, visceral fear for their safety and wellbeing. It has taken someone who has stared down the worst kind of street scum to pursue this case. We were all happy when Willis was burying gangster rappers just a year or two ago. And now you want to put her out of business?

I've always admired her and wished her well with the prosecution of this case. Wish she hadn't been so foolish. Donna Brazile called it when she said Fani "showed bad judgment."

All Fani has to do is transfer the case. If it's that strong, it will survive on its own. I'm sure Fani and her defenders would say that she did nothing wrong - and have an explanation for everything. The problem is exactly what Donna Brazile said - she showed bad judgment. She doesn't get a pass for doing so unless she transfers the case. The longer she holds onto it, and the more that comes out (including the recent phone records) the more public opinion will turn against the case itself.