Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There's a whole range of different reasons why a whole range of different people might want Charlie Kirk dead.

I’m interested in who, if you don’t mind sharing. I’m genuinely asking - I didn’t know who Kirk was and now I’ve seen a bunch of his clips. He just seemed very very Christian to me but not a “threat”. So I’m intrigued on which groups would want him silenced.

Same here. What’s the big beef with him? He seems like an excellent debater.
Somehow a lot of my amidst friends know of him in Chicago. And his wife played hoops at college!?

Do more research besides whatever your Facebook or Instagram reels are showing you. Please. Our country’s future depends on looking deeper than what our algorithms are showing us.

I see short clips out of context and then the longer talks are Socratic talks. Which ones should I watch?

Here’s a great summary, with links to the speeches and podcasts.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-views-guns-gender-climate.html

[Anonymous]

That rifle was likely staged prior to the shooting. He knew his way around that roof etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So much support for Charlie out there (in the real world) tonight! It honestly warms my heart that goodness and love are louder than the evil and hate that a select few are putting out over this.

This forum is like a sad underworld projection of reality. Your extreme comments and vitriol for anyone that disagrees with you are what creates the monsters that do something like this. People like these posters have turned a debate partner into a villain.

Agreed. The Epstein files need to be released to honor his memory and the Finance Committee needs to release their report. Let his symbolic last act be exposing the way money and power among our political and economic elites have corrupted our society.

I’m new here. What do the Epstein files have to do with this? I thought this was supposed to be a liberal trans shooter?

It’s not a liberal trans shooter. Authorities announced they have no idea who or where the shooter is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So much support for Charlie out there (in the real world) tonight! It honestly warms my heart that goodness and love are louder than the evil and hate that a select few are putting out over this.

This forum is like a sad underworld projection of reality. Your extreme comments and vitriol for anyone that disagrees with you are what creates the monsters that do something like this. People like these posters have turned a debate partner into a villain.

Agreed. The Epstein files need to be released to honor his memory and the Finance Committee needs to release their report. Let his symbolic last act be exposing the way money and power among our political and economic elites have corrupted our society.

I’m new here. What do the Epstein files have to do with this? I thought this was supposed to be a liberal trans shooter?

No that was the Minnesota school shooter. But he/she wanted to transition back to his bio sex. Instead he went nuts to save face.

So who’s this all American sharp shooter dressed in a black T-shirt with an American flag and blue jeans? Looks very masculine from his body type?

Welp, could be anybody. Literally anyone. Probably a male, does he identify as male, maybe? Was he in disguise, maybe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The limp is fake. He knows we analyze for stride.

You think he might be former law enforcement?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There's a whole range of different reasons why a whole range of different people might want Charlie Kirk dead.

I’m interested in who, if you don’t mind sharing. I’m genuinely asking - I didn’t know who Kirk was and now I’ve seen a bunch of his clips. He just seemed very very Christian to me but not a “threat”. So I’m intrigued on which groups would want him silenced.

Same here. What’s the big beef with him? He seems like an excellent debater.
Somehow a lot of my amidst friends know of him in Chicago. And his wife played hoops at college!?

Do more research besides whatever your Facebook or Instagram reels are showing you. Please. Our country’s future depends on looking deeper than what our algorithms are showing us.

I see short clips out of context and then the longer talks are Socratic talks. Which ones should I watch?

The ones he didn’t edit to make him look better.

Oh wait.

[Anonymous]

The shooter might actually get away with it. 😀

[Anonymous]

Charlie Kirk turned on Israel and was killed by Mossad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The limp is fake. He knows we analyze for stride.

You think he might be former law enforcement?

Former military.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The limp is fake. He knows we analyze for stride.

You think he might be former law enforcement?

Listen to all of law-enforcement on media. He wasn’t wearing gloves when he went down the staircase. He’s touching the staircases in very specific areas that they have on video and now they will test or have already tested for DNA. Very sloppy. There’s way too many leads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The limp is fake. He knows we analyze for stride.

You think he might be former law enforcement?

Maybe or just anyone with common sense knowing they’re on camera.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The shooter might actually get away with it. 😀

His DNA is on the towel and on the stair railing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That rifle was likely staged prior to the shooting. He knew his way around that roof etc.

He also knew to avoid eye contact and keep his head down away from the stairwell cameras.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The limp is fake. He knows we analyze for stride.

You think he might be former law enforcement?

Listen to all of law-enforcement on media. He wasn’t wearing gloves when he went down the staircase. He’s touching the staircases in very specific areas that they have on video and now they will test or have already tested for DNA. Very sloppy. There’s way too many leads.

He may not have a record to identify his prints.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The limp is fake. He knows we analyze for stride.

You think he might be former law enforcement?

Listen to all of law-enforcement on media. He wasn’t wearing gloves when he went down the staircase. He’s touching the staircases in very specific areas that they have on video and now they will test or have already tested for DNA. Very sloppy. There’s way too many leads.

+1
Touched sooo many things.