Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So much support for Charlie out there (in the real world) tonight! It honestly warms my heart that goodness and love are louder than the evil and hate that a select few are putting out over this.

This forum is like a sad underworld projection of reality. Your extreme comments and vitriol for anyone that disagrees with you are what creates the monsters that do something like this. People like these posters have turned a debate partner into a villain.

Agreed. The Epstein files need to be released to honor his memory and the Finance Committee needs to release their report. Let his symbolic last act be exposing the way money and power among our political and economic elites have corrupted our society.

I’m new here. What do the Epstein files have to do with this? I thought this was supposed to be a liberal trans shooter?

The Charlie Kirk shooting is a diversion.

What what?
What???

Who ordered the code red? Trump?

[Anonymous]

He seems like an excellent debater.

He had a team of people to prep him and then he'd 'debate' dumb 20 year olds and then clips would be all over social media.

Anytime he debated someone with a brain and expertise (professors, doctors) he lost.

He had a scheme. Which is legal in America. But he was just another guy who liked attention and money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shooter drags his right leg.

Is that a fake limp?

Either that or it is AFTER jumping off of the roof

TMZ said that the limp is before

Is it the limp of a man with a rifle down his pant leg? Or is he disabled?

These comments are astounding.

"Shooter drags his right leg."
"Shooter has a limp"
"Is that a fake limp?"

Like people are posting before thinking.

If I was going to shoot someone I would intentionally limp or be in a wheelchair or have a walker or something to disguise myself. He knew he’d be recorded.

Lol 😂 you doubled down! Einstein where would you keep your rifle?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

He seems like an excellent debater.

He had a team of people to prep him and then he'd 'debate' dumb 20 year olds and then clips would be all over social media.

Anytime he debated someone with a brain and expertise (professors, doctors) he lost.

He had a scheme. Which is legal in America. But he was just another guy who liked attention and money.

You were weird. I’m a liberal and I just don’t care. Who cares about this kind of stuff. Really? Get a life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There's a whole range of different reasons why a whole range of different people might want Charlie Kirk dead.

I’m interested in who, if you don’t mind sharing. I’m genuinely asking - I didn’t know who Kirk was and now I’ve seen a bunch of his clips. He just seemed very very Christian to me but not a “threat”. So I’m intrigued on which groups would want him silenced.

Same here. What’s the big beef with him? He seems like an excellent debater.
Somehow a lot of my amidst friends know of him in Chicago. And his wife played hoops at college!?

Do more research besides whatever your Facebook or Instagram reels are showing you. Please. Our country’s future depends on looking deeper than what our algorithms are showing us.

I see short clips out of context and then the longer talks are Socratic talks. Which ones should I watch?

There is no need. He's dead. It's not like hearing him talk was educational.

Pay attention to who steps into the void.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So much support for Charlie out there (in the real world) tonight! It honestly warms my heart that goodness and love are louder than the evil and hate that a select few are putting out over this.

This forum is like a sad underworld projection of reality. Your extreme comments and vitriol for anyone that disagrees with you are what creates the monsters that do something like this. People like these posters have turned a debate partner into a villain.

Agreed. The Epstein files need to be released to honor his memory and the Finance Committee needs to release their report. Let his symbolic last act be exposing the way money and power among our political and economic elites have corrupted our society.

I’m new here. What do the Epstein files have to do with this? I thought this was supposed to be a liberal trans shooter?

No that was the Minnesota school shooter. But he/she wanted to transition back to his bio sex. Instead he went nuts to save face.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There's a whole range of different reasons why a whole range of different people might want Charlie Kirk dead.

I’m interested in who, if you don’t mind sharing. I’m genuinely asking - I didn’t know who Kirk was and now I’ve seen a bunch of his clips. He just seemed very very Christian to me but not a “threat”. So I’m intrigued on which groups would want him silenced.

Same here. What’s the big beef with him? He seems like an excellent debater.
Somehow a lot of my amidst friends know of him in Chicago. And his wife played hoops at college!?

Do more research besides whatever your Facebook or Instagram reels are showing you. Please. Our country’s future depends on looking deeper than what our algorithms are showing us.

I see short clips out of context and then the longer talks are Socratic talks. Which ones should I watch?

There is no need. He's dead. It's not like hearing him talk was educational.

Pay attention to who steps into the void.

Why? We don’t care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So much support for Charlie out there (in the real world) tonight! It honestly warms my heart that goodness and love are louder than the evil and hate that a select few are putting out over this.

This forum is like a sad underworld projection of reality. Your extreme comments and vitriol for anyone that disagrees with you are what creates the monsters that do something like this. People like these posters have turned a debate partner into a villain.

Are you blind? There was a post in this thread that had a dozen right wing figureheads all calling for war against “the left” even though nobody knows who shot CK. What the hell is wrong with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He seems like an excellent debater.

He had a team of people to prep him and then he'd 'debate' dumb 20 year olds and then clips would be all over social media.

Anytime he debated someone with a brain and expertise (professors, doctors) he lost.

He had a scheme. Which is legal in America. But he was just another guy who liked attention and money.

You were weird. I’m a liberal and I just don’t care. Who cares about this kind of stuff. Really? Get a life.

You don't think influencers are part of what's happening in modern America?

[Anonymous]

The limp is fake. He knows we analyze for stride.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So much support for Charlie out there (in the real world) tonight! It honestly warms my heart that goodness and love are louder than the evil and hate that a select few are putting out over this.

This forum is like a sad underworld projection of reality. Your extreme comments and vitriol for anyone that disagrees with you are what creates the monsters that do something like this. People like these posters have turned a debate partner into a villain.

Agreed. The Epstein files need to be released to honor his memory and the Finance Committee needs to release their report. Let his symbolic last act be exposing the way money and power among our political and economic elites have corrupted our society.

I’m new here. What do the Epstein files have to do with this? I thought this was supposed to be a liberal trans shooter?

No that was the Minnesota school shooter. But he/she wanted to transition back to his bio sex. Instead he went nuts to save face.

So who’s this all American sharp shooter dressed in a black T-shirt with an American flag and blue jeans? Looks very masculine from his body type?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the NFL held a moment of silence for Charlie Kirk. Yankees did as well last night.

Disgusting. pandering to the White Supremacists in Green Bay. Why are you at a football game if you are in mourning?

And the Yankees, and what Kirk said about New York City.

Mainstream America is honoring him.

Mainstream American is a F’ing moron living in a trailer in Kentucky. Mainstream America got us into this mess.

You seem fun. /s

You seem like maga trash.

No /s

Classy. Louder!

This is what people who have been successfully bubbleized by the GOP and Dem Parties sound like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

There's a whole range of different reasons why a whole range of different people might want Charlie Kirk dead.

I’m interested in who, if you don’t mind sharing. I’m genuinely asking - I didn’t know who Kirk was and now I’ve seen a bunch of his clips. He just seemed very very Christian to me but not a “threat”. So I’m intrigued on which groups would want him silenced.

Same here. What’s the big beef with him? He seems like an excellent debater.
Somehow a lot of my amidst friends know of him in Chicago. And his wife played hoops at college!?

Do more research besides whatever your Facebook or Instagram reels are showing you. Please. Our country’s future depends on looking deeper than what our algorithms are showing us.

I see short clips out of context and then the longer talks are Socratic talks. Which ones should I watch?

There is no need. He's dead. It's not like hearing him talk was educational.

Pay attention to who steps into the void.

Why? We don’t care.

Because these people have an impact. Do you only consume left of center news?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So much support for Charlie out there (in the real world) tonight! It honestly warms my heart that goodness and love are louder than the evil and hate that a select few are putting out over this.

This forum is like a sad underworld projection of reality. Your extreme comments and vitriol for anyone that disagrees with you are what creates the monsters that do something like this. People like these posters have turned a debate partner into a villain.

Agreed. The Epstein files need to be released to honor his memory and the Finance Committee needs to release their report. Let his symbolic last act be exposing the way money and power among our political and economic elites have corrupted our society.

I’m new here. What do the Epstein files have to do with this? I thought this was supposed to be a liberal trans shooter?

No that was the Minnesota school shooter. But he/she wanted to transition back to his bio sex. Instead he went nuts to save face.

And see how quickly we forgot about those dead children. Moving on to the next and this one hit a little close to home. Onto the next…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

He seems like an excellent debater.

He had a team of people to prep him and then he'd 'debate' dumb 20 year olds and then clips would be all over social media.

Anytime he debated someone with a brain and expertise (professors, doctors) he lost.

He had a scheme. Which is legal in America. But he was just another guy who liked attention and money.

Where are the debate clips with professionals?

Like was he invited to CFR or Brookings?