Grand Jury Issues Sealed Indictments in Mueller Case

[Anonymous]

WSJ: Mueller Should Step Down from Russia Investigation

Aaron Bandler
21 hours ago

Screenshot from YouTube.
The Wall Street Journal editorial page has called on former FBI director Robert Mueller to step down from his role as special counsel in the Russia investigation.

The editorial recapped the news that broke earlier in the week that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) paid Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, to unearth information against then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. The firm produced a dossier comprising allegations against the president, including the claim that the Russians were blackmailing Trump with videos of him with Russian prostitutes. The editorial noted that the dossier was “based on largely anonymous, Kremlin-based sources.”

From JJ link

https://www.google.com/amp/s/jewishjournal.com/news/nation/226574/wsj-mueller-step-russia-investigation/amp/

[Anonymous]

NBC News has confirmed an indictment is coming Monday.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WSJ: Mueller Should Step Down from Russia Investigation

Aaron Bandler
21 hours ago

Screenshot from YouTube.
The Wall Street Journal editorial page has called on former FBI director Robert Mueller to step down from his role as special counsel in the Russia investigation.

The editorial recapped the news that broke earlier in the week that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) paid Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, to unearth information against then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. The firm produced a dossier comprising allegations against the president, including the claim that the Russians were blackmailing Trump with videos of him with Russian prostitutes. The editorial noted that the dossier was “based on largely anonymous, Kremlin-based sources.”

From JJ link

https://www.google.com/amp/s/jewishjournal.com/news/nation/226574/wsj-mueller-step-russia-investigation/amp/

Oh have they? Has the Rupert Murdoch run, conservative leaning editors requested that Mueller recuse himself? Who would've thought?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WSJ: Mueller Should Step Down from Russia Investigation

Aaron Bandler
21 hours ago

Screenshot from YouTube.
The Wall Street Journal editorial page has called on former FBI director Robert Mueller to step down from his role as special counsel in the Russia investigation.

The editorial recapped the news that broke earlier in the week that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) paid Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, to unearth information against then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. The firm produced a dossier comprising allegations against the president, including the claim that the Russians were blackmailing Trump with videos of him with Russian prostitutes. The editorial noted that the dossier was “based on largely anonymous, Kremlin-based sources.”

From JJ link

https://www.google.com/amp/s/jewishjournal.com/news/nation/226574/wsj-mueller-step-russia-investigation/amp/

Is this supposed to persuade me into believing Mueller should step down?

[Anonymous]

These trolls are too cute—the indictment Monday must be good. Keep deflecting as we all wait for the upcoming tweet storm...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These trolls are too cute—the indictment Monday must be good. Keep deflecting as we all wait for the upcoming tweet storm...

Trump was reported to be furious and melting down this morning. Somebody managed to keep him from responding on Twitter. He is off golfing right now, of course.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WSJ: Mueller Should Step Down from Russia Investigation

Aaron Bandler
21 hours ago

Screenshot from YouTube.
The Wall Street Journal editorial page has called on former FBI director Robert Mueller to step down from his role as special counsel in the Russia investigation.

The editorial recapped the news that broke earlier in the week that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) paid Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, to unearth information against then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. The firm produced a dossier comprising allegations against the president, including the claim that the Russians were blackmailing Trump with videos of him with Russian prostitutes. The editorial noted that the dossier was “based on largely anonymous, Kremlin-based sources.”

From JJ link

https://www.google.com/amp/s/jewishjournal.com/news/nation/226574/wsj-mueller-step-russia-investigation/amp/

Oh have they? Has the Rupert Murdoch run, conservative leaning editors requested that Mueller recuse himself? Who would've thought?

[Anonymous]

Trump's legal team bracing for charges to drop!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/28/trump-russia-probe-legal-244270

[Anonymous]

Even if they indict Manafort or Flynn, does this really affect Trump? Isn't he just going to say he had no idea what others oh his campaign were up to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even if they indict Manafort or Flynn, does this really affect Trump? Isn't he just going to say he had no idea what others oh his campaign were up to?

Probably. But that would be lying, and one of the ones indicted may flip and testify that they spoke to Trump, that he knew and agreed or at least did nothing to stop it. Likely agreed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even if they indict Manafort or Flynn, does this really affect Trump? Isn't he just going to say he had no idea what others oh his campaign were up to?

Of course. Trump always responds in In the same way:

1. Its fake news.

When that falls apart....

2. I had nothing to do with it.

When that proves false

3. Somebody else is to blame. I am victim.

When the noose tightens....

4. Attack the accuser. Go nuclear. Say they are out to get Trump... smear, flame, threaten, sue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These trolls are too cute—the indictment Monday must be good. Keep deflecting as we all wait for the upcoming tweet storm...

Trump was reported to be furious and melting down this morning. Somebody managed to keep him from responding on Twitter. He is off golfing right now, of course.

Bummer! Those tweets might have become the stuff of legend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These trolls are too cute—the indictment Monday must be good. Keep deflecting as we all wait for the upcoming tweet storm...

Trump was reported to be furious and melting down this morning. Somebody managed to keep him from responding on Twitter. He is off golfing right now, of course.

Bummer! Those tweets might have become the stuff of legend.

There's still time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Roll Call examines the possibilities here:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-5-possible-outcomes-of-first-mueller-indictments/ar-AAu9yum?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

With this kind of brilliant analysis?

Flynn became enamored with the kind of conservative conspiracy theories that helped power Trump to the White House. The longtime soldier, who had gone into the consulting world after being fired from the DIA by President Barack Obama, became a leading national security and foreign policy adviser to candidate Trump.

I’m to take this article seriously?

Please point out specifically what is false in the part you quoted.

Any article that uses the phrase “enamored with the kind of crazy conspiracy theories” exposes itself

Fact: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/05/us/politics/-michael-flynn-trump-fake-news-clinton.html

Pull quote "Six days before the election, for instance, Mr. Flynn posted on Twitter a fake news story that claimed the police and prosecutors in New York had found evidence linking Mrs. Clinton and much of her senior campaign staff to pedophilia, money laundering, perjury and other felonies."

Frankly, "enamored with the kind of conspiracy theories" is a very gentle way of referring to Flynn's craziness.

Just because what is written about a politician is negative doesn't mean it shouldn't be printed or is "fake news".