Grand Jury Issues Sealed Indictments in Mueller Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Roll Call examines the possibilities here:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-5-possible-outcomes-of-first-mueller-indictments/ar-AAu9yum?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

With this kind of brilliant analysis?

Flynn became enamored with the kind of conservative conspiracy theories that helped power Trump to the White House. The longtime soldier, who had gone into the consulting world after being fired from the DIA by President Barack Obama, became a leading national security and foreign policy adviser to candidate Trump.

I’m to take this article seriously?

Please point out specifically what is false in the part you quoted.

Any article that uses the phrase “enamored with the kind of crazy conspiracy theories” exposes itself

The language may be flowery, but it's accurate. Flynn's a nut.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:GOP Priorities

Tax Cuts>Treason

Liberal Priorities: Hillary as president, lying b h that she has always been, is more important than their very own integrity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is about indictments, which have nothing to do with the dossier.

Is Mueller also tasked with investigating Clinton/Podesta? Trying to figure out all the hyperactivity here.

He could, if they've done something illegal. Soon we'll find out, and I hope we all continue to retain respect and trust in the process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is about indictments, which have nothing to do with the dossier.

Is Mueller also tasked with investigating Clinton/Podesta? Trying to figure out all the hyperactivity here.

My understanding is the investigation goes in what ever direction the evidence takes it. If that means Clinton as well, then they will investigate.
This is an issue so many have had with the way this investigation was “worded.” It was too open-ended.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is about indictments, which have nothing to do with the dossier.

Is Mueller also tasked with investigating Clinton/Podesta? Trying to figure out all the hyperactivity here.

My understanding is the investigation goes in what ever direction the evidence takes it. If that means Clinton as well, then they will investigate.
This is an issue so many have had with the way this investigation was “worded.” It was too open-ended.

Why is it a problem? Find all the criminals. I don't think Mueller will find anything criminal on Clinton, but if he does, then charge her. Just based on the news, I already know of several pre- and post-election crimes by Trump's campaign.

Rule of law is important. It's more important than Trump and Clinton.

[Anonymous]

Funny movie trailer about Mueller's impending arrests.


https://mobile.twitter.com/FionaAdorno/status/924249965676732416/video/1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is about indictments, which have nothing to do with the dossier.

Is Mueller also tasked with investigating Clinton/Podesta? Trying to figure out all the hyperactivity here.

My understanding is the investigation goes in what ever direction the evidence takes it. If that means Clinton as well, then they will investigate.
This is an issue so many have had with the way this investigation was “worded.” It was too open-ended.

Why is it a problem? Find all the criminals. I don't think Mueller will find anything criminal on Clinton, but if he does, then charge her. Just based on the news, I already know of several pre- and post-election crimes by Trump's campaign.

Rule of law is important. It's more important than Trump and Clinton.

The problem isn’t so much of “who” is targeted. It is the lack of focus of the direction to begin with. Many believe the scope of the investigation is much too broad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is about indictments, which have nothing to do with the dossier.

The dossier was used to weaponize the FBI against Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Roll Call examines the possibilities here:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-5-possible-outcomes-of-first-mueller-indictments/ar-AAu9yum?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

With this kind of brilliant analysis?

Flynn became enamored with the kind of conservative conspiracy theories that helped power Trump to the White House. The longtime soldier, who had gone into the consulting world after being fired from the DIA by President Barack Obama, became a leading national security and foreign policy adviser to candidate Trump.

I’m to take this article seriously?

Please point out specifically what is false in the part you quoted.

Any article that uses the phrase “enamored with the kind of crazy conspiracy theories” exposes itself

The language may be flowery, but it's accurate. Flynn's a nut.

If you are a liberal, it’s accurate to you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Please explain to a layperson. What happens to those who are indicted?

In a nutshell: If someone’s believed to have committed a federal crime, they must either have a probable cause hearing before a judge or be indicted. That means the government has enough evidence (probable cause) to try the case. The target will be arrested and arraigned (booked for the crime and have a bail hearing). Normally a non-violent offender (not a danger to the community) will be released on bail. For a wealthy defendant, a lot of bail— unless they are deemed a flight risk. They then get a trial date and either go to trial or plea.

The indictment under seal is interesting. It may be to prevent a media circus this weekend and during the arrest. It is easy to being someone high profile in without the media being six deep. Or to prevent flight (but it seems unlikely that mAnnaforrt could leave the coountry anaad no one wold notice). Or— and this is my own personal conspiracy theory, based on nothing but hope and speculation— Don Jr or (more likely) Kusher are going to be indicted, and Mueller is afraid that Trump will try to interfere with the arrests/ start firing Mueller and his attorneys etc., and inflaming the public via Twitter. So it may be under seal to protect the investigation from Trump. He can still tweet, but he is more limited if he does not know the target. Nd he might cut Manafort loose, but he will fire Mueller,ER before Kushner is arrested

I agree it’s probably Manafort and/or Flynn, although the under seal thing is strange, because everyone knows they are going to becrged.

It would amazing it was Kushner.

I haven’t seen if there is only one indictment, or there might be several?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The mod is panicking. He is deleting all the posts critical of Mueller. The table has turned.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page has called on former FBI director Robert Mueller to step down from his role as special counsel in the Russia investigation.

The editorial recapped the news that broke earlier in the week that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) paid Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, to unearth information against then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. The firm produced a dossier comprising allegations against the president, including the claim that the Russians were blackmailing Trump with videos of him with Russian prostitutes. The editorial noted that the dossier was “based on largely anonymous, Kremlin-based sources.”

The editorial then pivoted to the FBI, pointing out that they were paying Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the dossier, “to continue his work in the run-up to the election.”

“Did the dossier trigger the FBI probe of the Trump campaign, and did Mr. Comey or his agents use it as evidence to seek wiretapping approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Trump campaign aides?” the editors asked.

The FBI’s role in regards to Fusion GPS and the Russian investigation needs to be investigated, which is why the Journal’s editors believe Mueller should step aside.

“Mr. Mueller is a former FBI director, and for years he worked closely with Mr. Comey,” the editors wrote. “It is no slur against Mr. Mueller’s integrity to say that he lacks the critical distance to conduct a credible probe of the bureau he ran for a dozen years. He could best serve the country by resigning to prevent further political turmoil over that conflict of interest.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/jewishjournal.com/new...step-russia-investigation/amp/

You are correct. I posted the original WSJ Editorial Board article yesterday here and it was deleted.

Talk about insane.

I have reported this as Fake News. The link redirects to a “page not found” at the Jewish Journal. It does not link to the WSJ, or an article discussing a WSJ editorial.

TL;DR—. PP is a lying liar who lies.

[Anonymous]

The FBI is not against Trump... they are just doing their jobs. Indeed, Trump claimed they were unfairly against Hillary ...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GOP Priorities

Tax Cuts>Treason

Liberal Priorities: Hillary as president, lying b h that she has always been, is more important than their very own integrity.

Hate her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Roll Call examines the possibilities here:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-5-possible-outcomes-of-first-mueller-indictments/ar-AAu9yum?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

With this kind of brilliant analysis?

Flynn became enamored with the kind of conservative conspiracy theories that helped power Trump to the White House. The longtime soldier, who had gone into the consulting world after being fired from the DIA by President Barack Obama, became a leading national security and foreign policy adviser to candidate Trump.

I’m to take this article seriously?

Please point out specifically what is false in the part you quoted.

Any article that uses the phrase “enamored with the kind of crazy conspiracy theories” exposes itself

What conspiracy theory isn't crazy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The mod is panicking. He is deleting all the posts critical of Mueller. The table has turned.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page has called on former FBI director Robert Mueller to step down from his role as special counsel in the Russia investigation.

The editorial recapped the news that broke earlier in the week that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) paid Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, to unearth information against then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. The firm produced a dossier comprising allegations against the president, including the claim that the Russians were blackmailing Trump with videos of him with Russian prostitutes. The editorial noted that the dossier was “based on largely anonymous, Kremlin-based sources.”

The editorial then pivoted to the FBI, pointing out that they were paying Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the dossier, “to continue his work in the run-up to the election.”

“Did the dossier trigger the FBI probe of the Trump campaign, and did Mr. Comey or his agents use it as evidence to seek wiretapping approval from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Trump campaign aides?” the editors asked.

The FBI’s role in regards to Fusion GPS and the Russian investigation needs to be investigated, which is why the Journal’s editors believe Mueller should step aside.

“Mr. Mueller is a former FBI director, and for years he worked closely with Mr. Comey,” the editors wrote. “It is no slur against Mr. Mueller’s integrity to say that he lacks the critical distance to conduct a credible probe of the bureau he ran for a dozen years. He could best serve the country by resigning to prevent further political turmoil over that conflict of interest.”

https://www.google.com/amp/s/jewishjournal.com/new...step-russia-investigation/amp/

You are correct. I posted the original WSJ Editorial Board article yesterday here and it was deleted.

Talk about insane.

I have reported this as Fake News. The link redirects to a “page not found” at the Jewish Journal. It does not link to the WSJ, or an article discussing a WSJ editorial.

TL;DR—. PP is a lying liar who lies.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/democrats-russians-and-the-fbi-1508971759

Original from WSJ

Jewish Journal

https://www.google.com/amp/s/jewishjournal.com/news/nation/226574/wsj-mueller-step-russia-investigation/amp/

I see articles at both links.