Married NY Times sports reporter viral after being busted allegedly having an affair with married NFL coach

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

Strawman. Literally no one said she's a "helpless victim".

The rabid attacks on women (by other women) is repulsive.

Why do you feel the need to go after these strangers and judge/jury them?

She massively effed up. She owned it, why can't you?

I'm not talking about her behavior.

I'm talking about the repulsive vultures who get off on trashing women.

Lol as if nobody trashes men. Come on.

The gossip vultures on DCUM never seem to trash men...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She broke a main rule of her career. I would not want her in my employ.

Or in my field. Her actions made it so much more difficult for female sports journalists to be taken seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

Exactly

No, she's in far more trouble because she's a journalist who had an inappropriate relationship with a source.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

That's not remotely the point.

What is your point? That poor little women can't be held responsible for their actions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

That's not remotely the point.

What is your point? That poor little women can't be held responsible for their actions.

That rabid hags will viciously tear apart complete strangers for sport.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

Strawman. Literally no one said she's a "helpless victim".

The rabid attacks on women (by other women) is repulsive.

Why do you feel the need to go after these strangers and judge/jury them?

She massively effed up. She owned it, why can't you?

I'm not talking about her behavior.

I'm talking about the repulsive vultures who get off on trashing women.

Lol as if nobody trashes men. Come on.

The gossip vultures on DCUM never seem to trash men...

There are enough wives trashing their husbands so…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

GMAFB.

It's sexist to always focus on the woman, not the man, in these situations.

This is different situation. She is a reporter apparently hooking up with a source/subject/in the know on the one thing she reports. She is married and has been accused of this before.

Excuses.

Not one thread trashing a guy having an affair.

And look at the title of this thread - it's about what SHE did. They're both gross, and anyone defending his behavior and crucifying her should be ashamed of themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

That's not remotely the point.

What is your point? That poor little women can't be held responsible for their actions.

That rabid hags will viciously tear apart complete strangers for sport.

Seems like women like you and Dianna can't seem to figure out why the sisterhood doesn't rally around you. It's truly a mystery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

Strawman. Literally no one said she's a "helpless victim".

The rabid attacks on women (by other women) is repulsive.

Why do you feel the need to go after these strangers and judge/jury them?

She massively effed up. She owned it, why can't you?

I'm not talking about her behavior.

I'm talking about the repulsive vultures who get off on trashing women.

Lol as if nobody trashes men. Come on.

But do they? How many professional athletes are out there doing this exact stuff and nobody bats an eye? Look no further than our White House to see that men get a pass for this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

You have no point that’s why nobody is grasping it. Women get away with just as much if not worse all the time.

You can keep repeating your drivel as much as you want but it doesn't make it true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

GMAFB.

It's sexist to always focus on the woman, not the man, in these situations.

This is different situation. She is a reporter apparently hooking up with a source/subject/in the know on the one thing she reports. She is married and has been accused of this before.

Excuses.

Not one thread trashing a guy having an affair.

And look at the title of this thread - it's about what SHE did. They're both gross, and anyone defending his behavior and crucifying her should be ashamed of themselves.

Please find the person "defending" his behavior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

That's not remotely the point.

What is your point? That poor little women can't be held responsible for their actions.

I'll try to use small words so you can understand. She can, and should, be held responsible for her actions. The point is that she is dealing with more because she's a woman. If it were a male reporter and a female coach, everyone would make a bigger deal about what the coach did and let the male reporter get away with less.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Another woman? Please. It’s pretty rare that women are taken down over things like this. How many can you actually name?

The Coldplay lady seemed to take a lot more heat than the man.

Amanda Batula is getting more heat than West Wilson.

Those are both current.

A few rare women. This is not a trend and by far more men’s careers are ruined. It’s only fair that women get to play by the same rules.

I have no problem with people playing by the same rules, which doesn't seem to be happening here or in the other cases above. Those women were demonized more than the men.

If you take a famous man and a no-name woman, then sure, the public fallout is going to be greater for the famous man because no one cares about the no-name woman.

In the examples above, both couples had the same level of fame (or lack thereof) and the woman got way more slaughtered.

Society absolutely holds woman to a higher standard than men. It's wild that you can't acknowledge that.

it's wild you're using this case to make your point. She quit because she knows she was in the wrong. Take it up with her.

You seem to have a pretty hard time grasping the point here. I'm not saying she isn't in the wrong. I'm not even saying she shouldn't be more "in trouble" than Vrabel in this case, given the difference in their careers. But I think she's in far more "trouble" than he is, and part of that is due to the fact that women are blamed more than men in these situations.

If Kamala Harris had had three husbands, she wouldn't have even been the presidential candidate. Meanwhile, look who's in the Oval Office.

You have no point that’s why nobody is grasping it. Women get away with just as much if not worse all the time.

You can keep repeating your drivel as much as you want but it doesn't make it true.

Same, babe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the gossip vultures are after another woman.

Gross.

Stop trying to make the woman the helpless victim. She put herself in the situation where her professionalism and reporting is now questionable. She's a journalist covering him not the other way around.

+1. It's gross paternalism to think that she can't be held accountable for her actions.

That's not remotely the point.

What is your point? That poor little women can't be held responsible for their actions.

I'll try to use small words so you can understand. She can, and should, be held responsible for her actions. The point is that she is dealing with more because she's a woman. If it were a male reporter and a female coach, everyone would make a bigger deal about what the coach did and let the male reporter get away with less.

The more you talk the dumber you sound. You can't seem to understand that they have different jobs and different expectations and therefore different consequences. She got caught flying a little too close to the sun. Oh well.