2014G

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NVA, Mclean, SYC, VDA, and Arlington are all going to be basically the same caliber of team whith FVU being a notch below if the core of their talent is coming from valor. Not that bad but not good enough to make the team consistently competitive with those I listed.

Still, theyll be able to grab a few wins against teams like Arlington in local tourneys and league play because even those better teams are not dominant teams. 2013s have better talent.

How can a team with 3-5 players from Valor plus kids who didn’t make other teams be just a notch below? Especially when everyone is saying MV is a bad coach. Also, is 2013 better talent or more distributed? You have no way of comparing 2013 vs 2014, especially with the age change.

It looks like their admins are working overtime because I guess they decided to move up to Feb 1 after all.

The 2013s were mostly McLean, right? They were a group of girls that were already good and had played together already. 2014 FVU seems like it will be a mix of a few girls from many different teams coming together for the first time. It could work.

Seems to be working mostly for the 2012s. They came from at least six different clubs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NVA, Mclean, SYC, VDA, and Arlington are all going to be basically the same caliber of team whith FVU being a notch below if the core of their talent is coming from valor. Not that bad but not good enough to make the team consistently competitive with those I listed.

Still, theyll be able to grab a few wins against teams like Arlington in local tourneys and league play because even those better teams are not dominant teams. 2013s have better talent.

How can a team with 3-5 players from Valor plus kids who didn’t make other teams be just a notch below? Especially when everyone is saying MV is a bad coach. Also, is 2013 better talent or more distributed? You have no way of comparing 2013 vs 2014, especially with the age change.

It looks like their admins are working overtime because I guess they decided to move up to Feb 1 after all.

The 2013s were mostly McLean, right? They were a group of girls that were already good and had played together already. 2014 FVU seems like it will be a mix of a few girls from many different teams coming together for the first time. It could work.

right, that 2013 FVU team are girls who have been playing together mostly since u9. How does FVU 2014 work? Where are these players coming from? How is a poor coach bringing together kids who aren’t as skilled and haven’t played together? I don’t see it.

[Anonymous]

SYC offers are coming out. My DD, current U13 player, Q4 birthday, coming from a different club, has received an offer for their Aspire U13 next year. Any insights to share?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SYC offers are coming out. My DD, current U13 player, Q4 birthday, coming from a different club, has received an offer for their Aspire U13 next year. Any insights to share?

I’d try a few other GA tryouts before I took an Aspire offer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SYC offers are coming out. My DD, current U13 player, Q4 birthday, coming from a different club, has received an offer for their Aspire U13 next year. Any insights to share?

I’d try a few other GA tryouts before I took an Aspire offer.

Understood. Of course there is the 48 hour deadline to accept.
We're coming from a smaller club that maxed out in NCSL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SYC offers are coming out. My DD, current U13 player, Q4 birthday, coming from a different club, has received an offer for their Aspire U13 next year. Any insights to share?

I’d try a few other GA tryouts before I took an Aspire offer.

Understood. Of course there is the 48 hour deadline to accept.
We're coming from a smaller club that maxed out in NCSL.

Just tell them you need a bit more time to decide. Clubs don’t pull offers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SYC offers are coming out. My DD, current U13 player, Q4 birthday, coming from a different club, has received an offer for their Aspire U13 next year. Any insights to share?

I’d try a few other GA tryouts before I took an Aspire offer.

Understood. Of course there is the 48 hour deadline to accept.
We're coming from a smaller club that maxed out in NCSL.

Just tell them you need a bit more time to decide. Clubs don’t pull offers.

You are going to run into an issue with the snow storm. Tryouts will be delayed a few weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NVA, Mclean, SYC, VDA, and Arlington are all going to be basically the same caliber of team whith FVU being a notch below if the core of their talent is coming from valor. Not that bad but not good enough to make the team consistently competitive with those I listed.

Still, theyll be able to grab a few wins against teams like Arlington in local tourneys and league play because even those better teams are not dominant teams. 2013s have better talent.

How can a team with 3-5 players from Valor plus kids who didn’t make other teams be just a notch below? Especially when everyone is saying MV is a bad coach. Also, is 2013 better talent or more distributed? You have no way of comparing 2013 vs 2014, especially with the age change.

because most of those teams only have 5 ‘top’ players. Rosters for NVA, SYC, Mclean, and Arlington are already at 14-18 and the lesser skilled players on all the rosters arent leaving or getting replaced by other lesser skilled players. All teams will carry interchangable lesser skilled players. FVU will be no different.

Unless a group of highly skilled players actively leave together from one team to another team, most of those clubs will remain the same plus or minus a q4 who is exceptional, and not much changes.

Id say VDA and FVU have more upside for potential because of the more fresh start and ability to choose players that havent been at the club for 3 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NVA, Mclean, SYC, VDA, and Arlington are all going to be basically the same caliber of team whith FVU being a notch below if the core of their talent is coming from valor. Not that bad but not good enough to make the team consistently competitive with those I listed.

Still, theyll be able to grab a few wins against teams like Arlington in local tourneys and league play because even those better teams are not dominant teams. 2013s have better talent.

How can a team with 3-5 players from Valor plus kids who didn’t make other teams be just a notch below? Especially when everyone is saying MV is a bad coach. Also, is 2013 better talent or more distributed? You have no way of comparing 2013 vs 2014, especially with the age change.

because most of those teams only have 5 ‘top’ players. Rosters for NVA, SYC, Mclean, and Arlington are already at 14-18 and the lesser skilled players on all the rosters arent leaving or getting replaced by other lesser skilled players. All teams will carry interchangable lesser skilled players. FVU will be no different.

Unless a group of highly skilled players actively leave together from one team to another team, most of those clubs will remain the same plus or minus a q4 who is exceptional, and not much changes.

Id say VDA and FVU have more upside for potential because of the more fresh start and ability to choose players that havent been at the club for 3 years.

Choose players from where though? Agreed that the GA teams set from existing rosters really just means adding a GA label to an existing team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SYC offers are coming out. My DD, current U13 player, Q4 birthday, coming from a different club, has received an offer for their Aspire U13 next year. Any insights to share?

I’d try a few other GA tryouts before I took an Aspire offer.

Understood. Of course there is the 48 hour deadline to accept.
We're coming from a smaller club that maxed out in NCSL.

Just tell them you need a bit more time to decide. Clubs don’t pull offers.

You are going to run into an issue with the snow storm. Tryouts will be delayed a few weeks.

This is my worry. Won't be able to check out other clubs with the snow.
DD was invited out for an ID session a couple weeks ago at McLean, but we haven't received any feedback yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SYC offers are coming out. My DD, current U13 player, Q4 birthday, coming from a different club, has received an offer for their Aspire U13 next year. Any insights to share?

I’d try a few other GA tryouts before I took an Aspire offer.

Understood. Of course there is the 48 hour deadline to accept.
We're coming from a smaller club that maxed out in NCSL.

Just tell them you need a bit more time to decide. Clubs don’t pull offers.

You are going to run into an issue with the snow storm. Tryouts will be delayed a few weeks.

This is my worry. Won't be able to check out other clubs with the snow.
DD was invited out for an ID session a couple weeks ago at McLean, but we haven't received any feedback yet.

If the coach didn’t ask to talk to you after then not promising. That 2014 team is pretty much set. While I’m sure the SYC Aspire team will be competitive, I am not sure you are buying much by asking for more time. It stinks, but you kind of set yourself up for this situation. Personally, I would just mentally prepare for other teams. FVU might be the best option to make a first team if that is the goal otherwise RL tryouts are in March and there should be some competitive teams looking for backfilling players that go to ECNL or elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MV has an A license, runs an efficient practice, doesn’t mess around with the parent bs. You could do much worse with coaches in the DMV.
Athletic kids who are serious about the game would do well with him, though he’s likely only to promote the really elite players.

This is like the tenth "doesn't mess around with the parent bs" post. If this is the talking point Onion came up with its bad guys.

It's to be respected. This forum is testament to how crazy the parents are

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SYC offers are coming out. My DD, current U13 player, Q4 birthday, coming from a different club, has received an offer for their Aspire U13 next year. Any insights to share?

I’d try a few other GA tryouts before I took an Aspire offer.

Understood. Of course there is the 48 hour deadline to accept.
We're coming from a smaller club that maxed out in NCSL.

Just tell them you need a bit more time to decide. Clubs don’t pull offers.

You are going to run into an issue with the snow storm. Tryouts will be delayed a few weeks.

This is my worry. Won't be able to check out other clubs with the snow.
DD was invited out for an ID session a couple weeks ago at McLean, but we haven't received any feedback yet.

If the coach didn’t ask to talk to you after then not promising. That 2014 team is pretty much set. While I’m sure the SYC Aspire team will be competitive, I am not sure you are buying much by asking for more time. It stinks, but you kind of set yourself up for this situation. Personally, I would just mentally prepare for other teams. FVU might be the best option to make a first team if that is the goal otherwise RL tryouts are in March and there should be some competitive teams looking for backfilling players that go to ECNL or elsewhere.

Based on location I’d try McLean, SYC and Alexandria.

If you are in Loudoun then NVA, Loudoun and VRSC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NVA, Mclean, SYC, VDA, and Arlington are all going to be basically the same caliber of team whith FVU being a notch below if the core of their talent is coming from valor. Not that bad but not good enough to make the team consistently competitive with those I listed.

Still, theyll be able to grab a few wins against teams like Arlington in local tourneys and league play because even those better teams are not dominant teams. 2013s have better talent.

How can a team with 3-5 players from Valor plus kids who didn’t make other teams be just a notch below? Especially when everyone is saying MV is a bad coach. Also, is 2013 better talent or more distributed? You have no way of comparing 2013 vs 2014, especially with the age change.

It looks like their admins are working overtime because I guess they decided to move up to Feb 1 after all.

The 2013s were mostly McLean, right? They were a group of girls that were already good and had played together already. 2014 FVU seems like it will be a mix of a few girls from many different teams coming together for the first time. It could work.

Seems to be working mostly for the 2012s. They came from at least six different clubs.

2012s are working for now. There is no future with FVU. It takes good coaching in the older age groups and not just good individual players.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MV has an A license, runs an efficient practice, doesn’t mess around with the parent bs. You could do much worse with coaches in the DMV.
Athletic kids who are serious about the game would do well with him, though he’s likely only to promote the really elite players.

This is like the tenth "doesn't mess around with the parent bs" post. If this is the talking point Onion came up with its bad guys.

It's to be respected. This forum is testament to how crazy the parents are

I knew you were an employee of MV. So obvious. Is this the new strategy to boost MVU’s image?