Did Vance throw his Hindu under the bus for not being a born again Christian today?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

That was like 15 years ago.

That picture is with camera filters and 10 pounds of makeup, and it looks like she had a face lifte the way those fake eyebrows are drawn on. Everything above her nose looks plastic and the cartoonish makeup was obviously overdone for HD cameras. Here she is without filters with her pageant sash on. It's like a different face and you can see heavy contouring. That was taken on her 23rd birthday and she's already looking late 20s/30. Amd she looks nothing like that today. Wait until the full facelift.

This is just objectively not an attractive woman. The puffiness or bloating may be caused by years of bulimia. There’s something about her face that is not right. Make up tries to distract from it, but makes her look a little trans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

This looks like a post-op trans woman or a man in (very good) drag.

Republican men are so gay lol

+100

Her face is so masculine. She actually looks a bit like Charlie. But she does put more effort into her appearance than Usha does which is in and of itself more attractive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

That was like 15 years ago.

You said she was a 7 in those pics. She is objectively attractive.

Regardless, my point still stands. MAGA men are not into the mousy librarian lawyer lady look that Usha has made her staple.

JD, like many a country bumpkin before him, likes his women a little on the trashy side.

I’m not the PP. And I believe Vance, Kirk, Schlapp, Miller, Cotton, Hawley, Graham, Scott, and a mile long list of men who control the right wing are closeted gay men in lavender marriages. Their taste in women is pretty irrelevant.

There is a reason Grindr overheats during the RNC and CPAC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

This looks like a post-op trans woman or a man in (very good) drag.

Republican men are so gay lol

Is she around 35 in this photo?

She looks hard edged.

[Anonymous]

There's a backstage clip of her going viral from this week's event with Vance and Erika legitimately walks like a man. I'm not speculating she's trans, I'm just saying she self-admits she was a sporty tomboy until her early 20s and she still carries herself in a masculine way. That is not attractive. I don't get a dainty sultry sexual vibe from her at all, I get a lesbian girlboss vibe forcing the pushy flirty behavior with men. It falls flat, to me. It's theater girl phony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

That was like 15 years ago.

You said she was a 7 in those pics. She is objectively attractive.

Regardless, my point still stands. MAGA men are not into the mousy librarian lawyer lady look that Usha has made her staple.

JD, like many a country bumpkin before him, likes his women a little on the trashy side.

I’m not the PP. And I believe Vance, Kirk, Schlapp, Miller, Cotton, Hawley, Graham, Scott, and a mile long list of men who control the right wing are closeted gay men in lavender marriages. Their taste in women is pretty irrelevant.

Yep. Prob not a coincidence that he’s extremely close to Peter Thiel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
That picture is with camera filters and 10 pounds of makeup, and it looks like she had a face lifte the way those fake eyebrows are drawn on. Everything above her nose looks plastic and the cartoonish makeup was obviously overdone for HD cameras. Here she is without filters with her pageant sash on. It's like a different face and you can see heavy contouring. That was taken on her 23rd birthday and she's already looking late 20s/30. Amd she looks nothing like that today. Wait until the full facelift.

You wouldn't look twice at this woman in any upper middle class suburb in America. She's got 2 or 3 kids, drives a white Tahoe or Grand Wagoneer, sips from a Stanley, uses FaceTime in public, and is always wearing huge black sunglasses. That said... you wouldn't even notice Usha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's a backstage clip of her going viral from this week's event with Vance and Erika legitimately walks like a man. I'm not speculating she's trans, I'm just saying she self-admits she was a sporty tomboy until her early 20s and she still carries herself in a masculine way. That is not attractive. I don't get a dainty sultry sexual vibe from her at all, I get a lesbian girlboss vibe forcing the pushy flirty behavior with men. It falls flat, to me. It's theater girl phony.

No, not the American Brigitte Macron. Please, no!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A while back there was a thread about Jeff Bezos and Lauren and wonder what he saw as attractive considering her obviously fakeness. Half of it is how far someone is willing to go to attract a man. Take Kristi Noem, she has a face full of migrated filler that will probably never be fixed and a head full of hair extensions all so she could be picked by dear leader. People send messages about how they want to be treated based on how they present themselves. Usha was a serious career woman who wanted to be taken seriously. She could have been powerful without JD Vance. All of her success is based on her brain and skill set. Erika’s comes from her looks. Men covet the blond hair and blue eyes, it’s just the way it is, and she has probably been able to use it to her advantage her whole life to climb higher.

Ericka’s success doesn’t come from her looks. They come from her family and cunning nature. IDK about Usha’s family, but she too is cunning. They’re both despicable liars, who have run their hands through a revolting man’s hair, which is all huh need to know about either of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A while back there was a thread about Jeff Bezos and Lauren and wonder what he saw as attractive considering her obviously fakeness. Half of it is how far someone is willing to go to attract a man. Take Kristi Noem, she has a face full of migrated filler that will probably never be fixed and a head full of hair extensions all so she could be picked by dear leader. People send messages about how they want to be treated based on how they present themselves. Usha was a serious career woman who wanted to be taken seriously. She could have been powerful without JD Vance. All of her success is based on her brain and skill set. Erika’s comes from her looks. Men covet the blond hair and blue eyes, it’s just the way it is, and she has probably been able to use it to her advantage her whole life to climb higher.

Ericka’s success doesn’t come from her looks. They come from her family and cunning nature. IDK about Usha’s family, but she too is cunning. They’re both despicable liars, who have run their hands through a revolting man’s hair, which is all huh need to know about either of them.

+1. I love how the Usha defenders act like she's some naive babe in the woods. Usha is a elbowy ruthless striver with a Yale bachelor's, Gates Cambridge Scholar, YLS, orbited the super creepy Tiger Mom and her creepy hubby for elite clerkships. Agrees to be set up by the same professors with this detestable doughboy fraud. She knew full well this was an arranged political marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
That picture is with camera filters and 10 pounds of makeup, and it looks like she had a face lifte the way those fake eyebrows are drawn on. Everything above her nose looks plastic and the cartoonish makeup was obviously overdone for HD cameras. Here she is without filters with her pageant sash on. It's like a different face and you can see heavy contouring. That was taken on her 23rd birthday and she's already looking late 20s/30. Amd she looks nothing like that today. Wait until the full facelift.

You wouldn't look twice at this woman in any upper middle class suburb in America. She's got 2 or 3 kids, drives a white Tahoe or Grand Wagoneer, sips from a Stanley, uses FaceTime in public, and is always wearing huge black sunglasses. That said... you wouldn't even notice Usha.

And the Stanley is full of white wine or as they call it "mommy juice" lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

That was like 15 years ago.

That picture is with camera filters and 10 pounds of makeup, and it looks like she had a face lifte the way those fake eyebrows are drawn on. Everything above her nose looks plastic and the cartoonish makeup was obviously overdone for HD cameras. Here she is without filters with her pageant sash on. It's like a different face and you can see heavy contouring. That was taken on her 23rd birthday and she's already looking late 20s/30. Amd she looks nothing like that today. Wait until the full facelift.

This is just objectively not an attractive woman. The puffiness or bloating may be caused by years of bulimia. There’s something about her face that is not right. Make up tries to distract from it, but makes her look a little trans.

She was never that pretty. Here she is at 18 from this article. Plus throw in a lifetime of Arizona sun and the future does not portend too kindly either.




And I may have found the infamous pants from an earlier time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

This looks like a post-op trans woman or a man in (very good) drag.

Republican men are so gay lol

JD would know a thing or two about drag….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

How old was she here? She looks 50.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

That was like 15 years ago.

That picture is with camera filters and 10 pounds of makeup, and it looks like she had a face lifte the way those fake eyebrows are drawn on. Everything above her nose looks plastic and the cartoonish makeup was obviously overdone for HD cameras. Here she is without filters with her pageant sash on. It's like a different face and you can see heavy contouring. That was taken on her 23rd birthday and she's already looking late 20s/30. Amd she looks nothing like that today. Wait until the full facelift.

This is just objectively not an attractive woman. The puffiness or bloating may be caused by years of bulimia. There’s something about her face that is not right. Make up tries to distract from it, but makes her look a little trans.

She was never that pretty. Here she is at 18 from this article. Plus throw in a lifetime of Arizona sun and the future does not portend too kindly either.




And I may have found the infamous pants from an earlier time.

I assume that’s how dad. She looks just like him. Eek.