Did Vance throw his Hindu under the bus for not being a born again Christian today?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here we have Usha four-ish months ago:



No makeup, poorly fitting dress, hair pulled back in what appears to just be a messy bun. She looks fine.

Here we have her a month after Charlie Kirk's death:


Good makeup, she did something with the frizzy hair, pencil skirt, stilettos. She looks good.

What's the reason for stepping it up? Hmm...

Nothing to say about the guys in that first picture? Fatty doesn't even button up his suit like he bought a jacket 2 sizes too small on sale and it won't close. Rubio looks like he just finished eating at a buffet cause that jacket's looking a half size too tight.

I'm the poster you're replying to and I've said elsewhere in this very thread that JD is ugly and doesn't know how to dress himself. But we're talking about him leaving Usha for Erika and I was simply pointing out that Usha has ratcheted her style efforts up significantly since that first pic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Hard to believe these two are barely 40 years old. Usha looks like a 70 year old retiree. And Vance looks like a middle aged hick you’d find working at Home Depot. Aesthetically I don’t think it matters who you pair Vance with; he’s so viscerally gross and subconsciously people can tell he was created in a lab and believes in nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

That was like 15 years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here we have Usha four-ish months ago:



No makeup, poorly fitting dress, hair pulled back in what appears to just be a messy bun. She looks fine.

Here we have her a month after Charlie Kirk's death:


Good makeup, she did something with the frizzy hair, pencil skirt, stilettos. She looks good.

What's the reason for stepping it up? Hmm...

Nothing to say about the guys in that first picture? Fatty doesn't even button up his suit like he bought a jacket 2 sizes too small on sale and it won't close. Rubio looks like he just finished eating at a buffet cause that jacket's looking a half size too tight.

I'm the poster you're replying to and I've said elsewhere in this very thread that JD is ugly and doesn't know how to dress himself. But we're talking about him leaving Usha for Erika and I was simply pointing out that Usha has ratcheted her style efforts up significantly since that first pic.

Gotta go for that Barbie ideal. MAGAs don't care about anything else from women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hard to believe these two are barely 40 years old. Usha looks like a 70 year old retiree. And Vance looks like a middle aged hick you’d find working at Home Depot. Aesthetically I don’t think it matters who you pair Vance with; he’s so viscerally gross and subconsciously people can tell he was created in a lab and believes in nothing.

The biggest shock of my life was when I learned Usha Vance is still in her 30s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

+1. Without stage lighting, makeup and hair she looks like a puffy-faced dime a dozen flyover state UMC suburban mom in her late 30s / early 40s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

That was like 15 years ago.

You said she was a 7 in those pics. She is objectively attractive.

Regardless, my point still stands. MAGA men are not into the mousy librarian lawyer lady look that Usha has made her staple.

JD, like many a country bumpkin before him, likes his women a little on the trashy side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Hard to believe these two are barely 40 years old. Usha looks like a 70 year old retiree. And Vance looks like a middle aged hick you’d find working at Home Depot. Aesthetically I don’t think it matters who you pair Vance with; he’s so viscerally gross and subconsciously people can tell he was created in a lab and believes in nothing.

The biggest shock of my life was when I learned Usha Vance is still in her 30s.

Wow. In that case no big deal when they divorce. The DCUM relationship forum just calls that a starter marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

That was like 15 years ago.

You said she was a 7 in those pics. She is objectively attractive.

Regardless, my point still stands. MAGA men are not into the mousy librarian lawyer lady look that Usha has made her staple.

JD, like many a country bumpkin before him, likes his women a little on the trashy side.

I’m not the PP. And I believe Vance, Kirk, Schlapp, Miller, Cotton, Hawley, Graham, Scott, and a mile long list of men who control the right wing are closeted gay men in lavender marriages. Their taste in women is pretty irrelevant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

+1. Without stage lighting, makeup and hair she looks like a puffy-faced dime a dozen flyover state UMC suburban mom in her late 30s / early 40s.

She looks so cute in that photo! On stage, it's quite another thing, but then perhaps if you don't layer on the make-up an inch thick, you look washed out under stage lights? I wouldn't know.

I think we should stop tearing women down and just focus on criticizing JD for his disrespectful comment vis-a-vis his wife's religious roots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

That was like 15 years ago.

That picture is with camera filters and 10 pounds of makeup, and it looks like she had a face lifte the way those fake eyebrows are drawn on. Everything above her nose looks plastic and the cartoonish makeup was obviously overdone for HD cameras. Here she is without filters with her pageant sash on. It's like a different face and you can see heavy contouring. That was taken on her 23rd birthday and she's already looking late 20s/30. Amd she looks nothing like that today. Wait until the full facelift.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

What the hell happened to people's opinions in the past two decades? Is she attractive as a single mother at the local PTA meeting? Sure. But the looks of famous people are not judged based on the average person you see at Costco. EK is not pretty. Have you seen her pageant pictures? She's like a 7 at best, with full makeup on. And I'm guessing she's one of those people who look objectively worse when you see them up close in person, with all that foundation and eyeliner, maybe even fake eyelashes. Now when you throw in her character or she opens her mouth and starts speaking, she immediately drops to a 5.

You're arguing from the perspective of a normal woman, not a MAGA man. Behold, the pics where you say Erika Kirk is a "7 at best":



You think a fat, trashy guy like JD isn't into this? Most red blooded men are. It's too cake-y and fake for me, and as I've said elsewhere in this thread, lacks sophistication, but JD Vance isn't looking for sophistication in his next piece of strange.

This looks like a post-op trans woman or a man in (very good) drag.

Republican men are so gay lol

[Anonymous]

A while back there was a thread about Jeff Bezos and Lauren and wonder what he saw as attractive considering her obviously fakeness. Half of it is how far someone is willing to go to attract a man. Take Kristi Noem, she has a face full of migrated filler that will probably never be fixed and a head full of hair extensions all so she could be picked by dear leader. People send messages about how they want to be treated based on how they present themselves. Usha was a serious career woman who wanted to be taken seriously. She could have been powerful without JD Vance. All of her success is based on her brain and skill set. Erika’s comes from her looks. Men covet the blond hair and blue eyes, it’s just the way it is, and she has probably been able to use it to her advantage her whole life to climb higher.