You are tons deaf. I am not defending Trump or GOP or the Dems. I am for entirely new parties. As far as I am concerned — and have been before Musk showed up — the Dems and GOP are the same. The Dems will be hard pressed to have me back volunteering or donating again as I will be supporting any party or parties looking to become a new major party. |
You’re the poster child for this cesspool of a thread. Our tax dollars pay for your rotting red states. OP created this clickbait thread and y’all fell for it. |
Report: Walmart Workers Cost Taxpayers $6.2 Billion In Public Assistance **NOTE: This was 10 years ago, so likely much higher https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/04/15/report-walmart-workers-cost-taxpayers-6-2-billion-in-public-assistance/ Walmart is the most anti-union company in the US. “With 1.3 million U.S. employees—more than the population of Vermont and Wyoming combined—Walmart is by far the nation’s largest private-sector employer. It’s also one of the nation’s most aggressive anti-union companies, with a long history of trying to squelch unionization efforts.” https://populardemocracy.org/news-article/news-how-walmart-persuades-its-workers-not-unionize/ Walmart is a net destroyer of jobs. “Consumers go to Walmart stores in search of bargains, rarely questioning why this company is able to make so much money and why the workforce scrapes by. Nor do they stop and ponder the fact that for all of its rhetoric, Walmart is a net destroyer of jobs, costing 3 jobs for every 2 “created.” Their business model, in fact, undermines existing, local retail jobs.” https://www.phillytrib.com/commentary/walmart-and-underemployment/article_72bc4c08-1412-511b-843d-fb21f925b741.html Walmart makes communities poorer. “Two new research papers challenge that view. Using creative new methods, they find that the costs Walmart imposes in the form of not only lower earnings but also higher unemployment in the wider community outweigh the savings it provides for shoppers. On net, they conclude, Walmart makes the places it operates in poorer than they would be if it had never shown up at all. Sometimes consumer prices are an incomplete, even misleading, signal of economic well-being.” https://www.theatlantic.com/economy/archive/2024/12/walmart-prices-poverty-economy/681122/ Walmart forced suppliers to manufacture products in China to stay on its shelves. Here’s the Etch-a-Sketch example. “Thus, when Wal-Mart wants to bargain a lower wholesale price, the supplier is forced to accept it, or face the loss of most of its business and possible bankruptcy. That translates into suppliers being squeezed, forced to pay their workers less, cut benefits and, if there is a union involved, “get tough” at the bargaining table. Eventually, suppliers are forced to go to Mexico, China, or Sri Lanka if they wish to continue to produce the goods for Wal-Mart. Such was the case of Ohio Art, which was urged by Wal-Mart to produce a product that could sell for under $10. When introduced in 1960, Etch A Sketch sold for $3.99, and with inflation would sell for $23.99 in today’s prices. So, to keep the business, Ohio Art moved production to Shenzhen.” https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/etch-a-sketch-and-the-wal-mart-phenomenon/ And as a result of Walmart’s practices, the US lost 400K jobs. https://www.fastcompany.com/3054629/walmarts-trade-with-china-may-have-eliminated-400000-us-jobs This is just scratching the surface…. |
I think people need to distinguish between economic and social issues. Democrats lost an enormous amount of voters in recent years with their social priorities, both locally and nationally. Restorative Justice in schools really wrecked a lot of schools because now bullies and disruptive students have no consequences whatsoever. And that's made a lot of public schools a nightmare - and I can guarantee a lot of very liberal parents are appalled by what Democrats have done in this space. And every parent remembers local Democrats closing public schools for a year and a half while allowing private schools, bars, and restaurants to remain open.
Do not underestimate how pissed off people are when it comes to what Democrats did to public schools and kids. That is a huge issue. Democrats lost a lot of families there. And Democrats lost a lot of other people with their encouragement of unrestricted illegal migration. Letting millions walk across the border hurt communities everywhere, especially the working and middle class. From wage pressure to higher housing costs to demands on social services to schools to crime. Speaking of crime, why on earth are Democrats so enthusiastic about advocating for violent men rather than their victims? Another huge loss. And DEI. Everyone understands the legacy of slavery. But it's 2025, not 1925. Preferential hiring and promotions based on race is going to piss off 85 percent of the electorate. However, most middle class Americans understand the present economic system isn't working for them. Inflation. The costs of health care. Retirement. The quality of schools. And a hundred other real life issues. Trump and Republicans suck. But Democrats are so lost that they offer absolutely nothing. I mean 83 year old geriatric Joe Biden? The B team diversity candidate Kamala Harris? And now what - sleaze-ball shapeshifter Gavin Newsom? If Bernie Sanders was 20 years younger, it'd be ok. 65 year old Bernie Sanders would win in a heartbeat today. But he's 83 - too old. In the meantime, there is nothing compelling in the Democratic Party. No future Obama or anything. There is nothing about anything in the modern Democratic Party. It's just... vapor. And that makes people angry and feeling lost. This is prime time for a third party, because Democrats are an absolute failure when it comes to providing an alternative to MAGA. |
I don't understand what Democrats did to schools. My one kid just graduated high school, and her experience was fine. |
Are you a white woman? If so, you benefitted from DEI. Please Google for your edification. |
Omg how are people this clueless Removing advanced classes in the name of equity Keeping schools closed down for years due to COVID when many schools remained open the entire time with no issues Forcing kids to be schooled with students who disruptive and bullying Removing teaching techniques that work and replacing them with half-baked nonsense |
Many women and people of color oppose DEI even if it may benefit them to some extent. Are you saying people should only support policies which specifically benefit their identity group? |
It was an illusion, pp. The Democrats hate your child and ruined her schooling. Can’t you see how she would have been much better in Alabama where they love children and will do anything for them, including keeping schools open and prohibiting masks because sickly kids were rightly sent home for schooling and dead teachers were easily replaced?! You should never vote for these malicious and myopic monsters ever again. I mean for the rest of your life. Stop being a blind follower and never, ever forgive these greedy coastal elites. /s |
Did I say she needed to support it? No, I did not. She claimed only black people, who had roots in slavery, benefitted from DEI and that’s factually wrong. How can you support or oppose a policy until you understand what it entails? I know this seems radical! But, really, I encourage you both to do more homework instead of spewing nonsense. |
Also, DEI won’t piss off 85% of the electorate. Polling has shown that half or more than half of Americans support DEI hiring and DEI training. |
What are you taking about? My kid took plenty of AP and DE classes. They excelled in online classes during COVID. They were never bullied. They never complained about the teaching techniques and graduated with a gpa close to 4.2. |
The devil is in the details - most people support fairness in hiring, college admissions, etc. and oppose discrimination. Opposition to discrimination, for most people, does not mean favoring minorities over non-minorities simply because of their minority status. It all depends on how questions around DEI are framed. Most DEI policies explicitly gave preference to minorities, which is of course discrimination against all others, to redress "past discrimination" due to long-past overt discriminatory practices not experienced by anyone presently alive today. Most voters saw through DEI for what it was - discrimination based favoring certain skin colors. Trying to bring back an emphasis on DEI to putatively promote "fairness" and "equity" will not resonate at all with most of the electorate, who see it for blatant discrimination dressed up in noble-sounding but morally bankrupt language. |
And sadly MAGA is still completely enamored with the false mythology of DEI being about hiring or promoting less qualified gay black midget muslim amputees over the vastly and supremely more qualified white males and thereby screwing over the poor white male victims. It isn't. |
The cluelessness from the dem defenders is the essence of the issue with democrats. They live in Privileged bubble and do not relate to most people.
I guess their egos are too fat and hungry to acknowledge that the majority of the voting populace doesn’t buy what they are selling. All dems have to do is change what they are peddling. I’ll wager that they won’t do this and just dig their heels in harder. Because they can never admit their mistakes, like a toddler. |