
Yes, the “pattern” you see is the systematic assault of our constitution—by Trump and MAGA. It’s truly pathetic that you find it a “beautiful” thing. It’s not a game. |
The president’s job is to enforce the laws of our nation. If she wants to keep boys and men on the girls teams, fine, but don’t expect the federal government to pay for it. |
I can assure you that this clip is all over "left wing media" and people are cheering her on. We need more politicians willing to stand up to Trump. Republicans, your elected representatives have become rubber stamps for anything and all that Trump wants to do. Can you please point out several instances where Republican senators or members of Congress have opposed Trump, on any issue? They are completely dominated by him due to his and Elon's primary threats. |
It is all over left-wing media, yes, and they are cheering for her. But left-wing media doesn’t realize how marginalized it is. Three people who read Mother Jones cheering for her do not result in Democratic victories. You know who isn’t retweeting clips of her? Who isn’t weighing in? Democratic politicians who want to win again. |
Just more people who are susceptible to click bait. The law in question has to do with family law and artificial insemination and making language clear when it comes to same sex couples. Rage bait and mouth foamers fall for it every time. |
13:33 again. By "left wing media" I mean CNN and MSNBC (which I actually don't think is at all left wing, but I bet you do, 13:37. However, you didn't answer my question: Can you please point out several instances where Republican senators or members of Congress have opposed Trump, on any issue? |
The person that is getting pregnant is a mother. It doesn’t matter what her partner’s sex is. Stop erasing women! |
No, we aren’t falling for this reframing and gaslighting any more. It’s not 2019. There is no need for rewriting the law to turn mother into “inseminated person” even to support same sex couples. Lesbians who have babies are still mothers. This was classic cult language policing, correctly identified as such by Ritchie Torres. And it is indeed repellent behavior from the Wisconsin governor, who should be spending his time on far more important matters. |
Why should I? I’m not a Republican. I’m a Democrat who wants the Democrats to abandon the far left elitist and fanatical religious extremists and get back to supporting labor, the middle class, and rigorous education. |
You think Ritchie Torres is a mouth foamer? Uh, okay. |
Not gaslighting you moron. . The way the statute was originally written, references to biological sex made it seem as if only husbands and IVF straight couples could get custody. now it's clear for lesbian couples that they both have parental rights not just the inseminated person, and to be fair they also changed it to "donor person" as well to avoid all mentions of sex so that there was no confusion and these laws cannot be used against gay couples for custody. But just go on and keep showing your f****** ignorance. You're not a lesbian who's had to fight for custody of her child in a conservative State like Wisconsin so of course you're offended by something that literally doesn't affect you. |
He is if he's continuing to spread misinformation. This change was absolutely necessary to protect lesbian mothers but sure...instead of clarifying he posts in a way that gives it legitimacy for the mouth foamers. So yeah. |
Okay, you can take that approach. See how far it gets you. |