APS School Board Election 2024

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark swept that election. Pretty big margin over #2 Tapia-Hadley. Wonder how T-H feels about that?

Weiss a distant third, but bested Rives who’s in dead last. Embarrassing for Rives.

I doubt it’s embarrassing for him… he was the only non-Democrat. Of course he never had a chance.

why keep running just to lose?

If things were reversed and you found yourself as a Democrat in a majority Republican community with rubber-stamped Republican candidates always victorious, why would you run? To get your voice heard, your different point of view heard. Or, you could not run and do nothing to change the status quo that you loathe.

If he runs again, he's going to become Audrey Clement.

Uh, I think he has several election cycles to go to even approach Clement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark swept that election. Pretty big margin over #2 Tapia-Hadley. Wonder how T-H feels about that?

Weiss a distant third, but bested Rives who’s in dead last. Embarrassing for Rives.

I doubt it’s embarrassing for him… he was the only non-Democrat. Of course he never had a chance.

why keep running just to lose?

If things were reversed and you found yourself as a Democrat in a majority Republican community with rubber-stamped Republican candidates always victorious, why would you run? To get your voice heard, your different point of view heard. Or, you could not run and do nothing to change the status quo that you loathe.

If he runs again, he's going to become Audrey Clement.

She serves her purpose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark swept that election. Pretty big margin over #2 Tapia-Hadley. Wonder how T-H feels about that?

Weiss a distant third, but bested Rives who’s in dead last. Embarrassing for Rives.

I doubt it’s embarrassing for him… he was the only non-Democrat. Of course he never had a chance.

why keep running just to lose?

If things were reversed and you found yourself as a Democrat in a majority Republican community with rubber-stamped Republican candidates always victorious, why would you run? To get your voice heard, your different point of view heard. Or, you could not run and do nothing to change the status quo that you loathe.

If he runs again, he's going to become Audrey Clement.

She serves her purpose.

which is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clark swept that election. Pretty big margin over #2 Tapia-Hadley. Wonder how T-H feels about that?

Weiss a distant third, but bested Rives who’s in dead last. Embarrassing for Rives.

I doubt it’s embarrassing for him… he was the only non-Democrat. Of course he never had a chance.

why keep running just to lose?

If things were reversed and you found yourself as a Democrat in a majority Republican community with rubber-stamped Republican candidates always victorious, why would you run? To get your voice heard, your different point of view heard. Or, you could not run and do nothing to change the status quo that you loathe.

If he runs again, he's going to become Audrey Clement.

She serves her purpose.

which is?

Providing an opportunity for statement or protest votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do people make of Clark beating Tapia-Hadley? I think it was the opposite back in the Dem primary.

That enough people in the know appreciated that Kathleen actually has real credentials and experience and gave their other vote most likely to Paul or only cast one vote. Zuraya still had her name on the D sample ballot so of course she was going to win, but people paying attention knew she was actually the least qualified candidate among the four.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do people make of Clark beating Tapia-Hadley? I think it was the opposite back in the Dem primary.

That enough people in the know appreciated that Kathleen actually has real credentials and experience and gave their other vote most likely to Paul or only cast one vote. Zuraya still had her name on the D sample ballot so of course she was going to win, but people paying attention knew she was actually the least qualified candidate among the four.

+1

+2. Dems should stay out of the business of running a primary for a *non-partisan* position

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do people make of Clark beating Tapia-Hadley? I think it was the opposite back in the Dem primary.

That enough people in the know appreciated that Kathleen actually has real credentials and experience and gave their other vote most likely to Paul or only cast one vote. Zuraya still had her name on the D sample ballot so of course she was going to win, but people paying attention knew she was actually the least qualified candidate among the four.

+1

+2. Dems should stay out of the business of running a primary for a *non-partisan* position

How do we get them out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do people make of Clark beating Tapia-Hadley? I think it was the opposite back in the Dem primary.

That enough people in the know appreciated that Kathleen actually has real credentials and experience and gave their other vote most likely to Paul or only cast one vote. Zuraya still had her name on the D sample ballot so of course she was going to win, but people paying attention knew she was actually the least qualified candidate among the four.

This.