Lock him up indictment FL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone still defending Trump is an idiot. He is a liar, thief and a national disgrace. Put him away for good so he does no more harm other than fleecing his gullible followers.

Right. Everything in the indictment reflect his personality. You really have to dismiss reality to defend him!

In order to continue to defend Donald Treasonweasel, one also has to decide that one hates the United States. The sloppy, slovenly way that Trump and his idiot party treated classified information - obtained at no small cost to many thousands of American citizens and thousands more foreign citizens working on our behalf - is beyond the pale. God only knows what damage was done to our country by Trump with this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 2011 at the time of this speech, the fact that seal team 6 killed Bin Laden was classified. I look forward to the forthcoming indictment of this unauthorized release.

A few weeks later, a helo was shot down in Afghanistan and killed 6 seals, including the son of a close friend.

Debunked...

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-biden-navy-seal/false-claim-biden-revealed-identities-of-navy-seal-team-six-idUSKBN22W2AI
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/08/17/fact-check-biden-did-not-leak-seal-team-6-identities/3368869001/

The leaks to the media were anonymous, yet the first to publicly discuss this was the VP. Try as you may to debunk, we all know Joe loves to boast.

Biden was giving a speech honoring Admiral James Stavridis so he acknowledged the "Navy Seals" role. Here, read the speech, and admit that you're just spreading more crap. Stop doing that, and start acting like you actually care about our country. Because what Trump has done is INDEFENSIBLE.

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/commentary/transcript/transcript-2011-atlantic-council-awards-dinner/

Trump boasts in Bedminster and is indicted. Biden boasted and publicly disclosed classified information at the time and nothing. When Jack Smith said today that there is only one set of rules pertaining to the law, he lied. SC Hur should address this issue.

I appreciate that you're spinning as hard as you can, but there's no comparison at all.

[Anonymous]

The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.

He was storing nuclear secrets in a shower. Get real and get bent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.

You are a moron. That is a fact that has not changed since the day you were born.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.

Can you explain how it doesn’t apply to ex-presidents?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.

It hasn’t been applied because no former president has been so f$cking stupid and corrupt that they violated it.

[Anonymous]

Bottom of the barrel trolls today. You can tell how bad it is when the good trolls won’t even bother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.

It hasn’t been applied because no former president has been so f$cking stupid and corrupt that they violated it.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.

“Former President” is not a category under the law. He’s just a citizen.

[Anonymous]

Mark Levin’s legal acumen is just breathtaking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Bottom of the barrel trolls today. You can tell how bad it is when the good trolls won’t even bother.

The good trolls. 🤣🤣

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The espionage act doesn't apply to the Commander In Chief, either in office or after leaving office. In the 106 years since enacted, it was never used against a President or candidate until yesterday.

Well we have never had a president as bad as trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The indictment is online at NYtimes and it’s nuts. This mofo kept these secrets in a shower and on stage at Maralgo.

This photo is even worse than the shower and ballroom ones IMO.