None of them can win nationally with their unpopular, anti-women, views on abortion. How many referendum do they need to see where the voters make it clear that they do not want abortion bans and will vote accordingly? |
On the contrary. The GOP view is the most pro-woman as it is in favor of giving future women life itself. |
I mean if that’s the alternate facts version you want to reassure yourself, sure. However, if you look at actual referendums like in a Ohio, abortion rights is a very big deal to many voters. |
It is fine to hold that view but the lack of respect for voters that hold pro choice views means the GOP candidates cannot get enough votes to win nationally. |
| Nope. Does not have foreign policy experience. |
Disagree. Other issues will eventually become more important |
There it is folks. The GOP doesn’t care about women who are alive in the world right now and their lives. They only care about potential “future” women. |
Dream on. Doubt you have much experience with pregnancy or miscarriage or birth or child-raising to dismiss such a critical issue. |
Just because fox news did not spend much time on it during their debate or during their daily coverage does not mean it is not of primary importance to many voters out here. Look into all the referendums put to the voters since roe was overturned to see some reality about this issue. |
Choice connects to almost every issue. |
You mean all those candidates that pledged to pardon TFG?! Right. You are a simpleton if you think the GOP is a viable party. |
I disagree but assuming you’re correct, the party can only move past Trump when he dies. Even prison won’t stop his followers from supporting him. |
Republicans. They’re not smart people. |
The party is Trump and Trump is the party. There is no “moving past” him. He is the funny looking pimple that tells of systemic infection. There is no saving the GOP as evidenced by one of the other front runners being a 9/11 and 1/6 conspiracy theorist. And what’s the GOP’s platform? Hating women and killing the government? You think that’s Trump limited? Which of these buffoons has a better idea? |
The damage is done long after he is gone. Look what he did to SCOTUS. If the Dems can continue to find candidates that can take the swing states, they should have a good long long long run. |