Vivek Ramaswamy Presidential candidate

[Anonymous]

He is not an immigrant. He was born in Cincy.

His biotech company got five drugs approved by the FDA that covers maladies typically ignored by big Pharma.

Johnson was race bathing when he signed AA by EO. He would undo that. He is very articulate.

If anyone is interested in actually listening before Judging, he did Mike Rowe’s podcast today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He is not an immigrant. He was born in Cincy.

His biotech company got five drugs approved by the FDA that covers maladies typically ignored by big Pharma.

Johnson was race bathing when he signed AA by EO. He would undo that. He is very articulate.

If anyone is interested in actually listening before Judging, he did Mike Rowe’s podcast today.

You are delusional. Read a history book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.

You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.

I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.

I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.

Anti-ESG is pro-nepotism, class privilege, caste privilege, clan privilege, sect privilege, and transactional pay to play privilege. There is no meritocracy anywhere at anytime, and especially not among the anti-ESG patronage network.

Why do you care so much about this with as many problems that are facing this country? Jesus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

Smart people can be very stupid in practical matters, and he seems to exemplify that in spades. Go to his Twitter feed if you need proof.

To me, this is just another way of saying he's inexperienced at politics, which I would agree with.

Then again, all of the "expert class" were horribly wrong about Trump. I don't think Vivek has the natural "stuff" to pull off what Trump did.

Obama himself, who is lauded as some type of political phenom, was very awkward and professorial (yes, more than he still is) with his delivery when he first got into politics. Abner Mikva and others had to tell him to knock it off and go to a black church to learn how to communicate with people.

I think I am going to stick with Ramaswamy being a stupid smart person. At best he's a kook. At worst he's a culture war internet troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

Smart people can be very stupid in practical matters, and he seems to exemplify that in spades. Go to his Twitter feed if you need proof.

To me, this is just another way of saying he's inexperienced at politics, which I would agree with.

Then again, all of the "expert class" were horribly wrong about Trump. I don't think Vivek has the natural "stuff" to pull off what Trump did.

Obama himself, who is lauded as some type of political phenom, was very awkward and professorial (yes, more than he still is) with his delivery when he first got into politics. Abner Mikva and others had to tell him to knock it off and go to a black church to learn how to communicate with people.

I think I am going to stick with Ramaswamy being a stupid smart person. At best he's a kook. At worst he's a culture war internet troll.

The last one doesn’t even make sense- he wants to put Marshalls in every public school and thinks that would have prevented a shooting at a private school?

[Anonymous]

Whip smart guy.

Don’t think he’s ready for the big seat but I am thrilled he’s in the race, and I am donating, because I think he’ll elevate the discourse.

Signed - white conservative guy, and believe it or not most of us care about ideas a helluva lot more than color.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

Smart people can be very stupid in practical matters, and he seems to exemplify that in spades. Go to his Twitter feed if you need proof.

To me, this is just another way of saying he's inexperienced at politics, which I would agree with.

Then again, all of the "expert class" were horribly wrong about Trump. I don't think Vivek has the natural "stuff" to pull off what Trump did.

Obama himself, who is lauded as some type of political phenom, was very awkward and professorial (yes, more than he still is) with his delivery when he first got into politics. Abner Mikva and others had to tell him to knock it off and go to a black church to learn how to communicate with people.

I think I am going to stick with Ramaswamy being a stupid smart person. At best he's a kook. At worst he's a culture war internet troll.

An internet troll that's a bio Pharma multi millionaire and worked at a hedge fund while also attending law school....ok.

Believe it or not, stuff he says resonates with people...they just don't reside in your bubble. Heck, you're still talking about him. Seems like what he's doing is working for what he needs right now.

[Anonymous]

Maybe not a simple-minded fool, but a grifter targeting simple-minded fools. There is a big market for these dumbed-down greed, anger, and delusion narratives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe not a simple-minded fool, but a grifter targeting simple-minded fools. There is a big market for these dumbed-down greed, anger, and delusion narratives.

News flash...the vast majority of voters, regardless of party, are simple-minded fools that can't really be bothered with detailed Liz Warren style proposals. Targeting them is called campaigning. It isn't a dissertation defense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whip smart guy.

Don’t think he’s ready for the big seat but I am thrilled he’s in the race, and I am donating, because I think he’ll elevate the discourse.

Signed - white conservative guy, and believe it or not most of us care about ideas a helluva lot more than color.

I have heard him address issues for a while.
Love the guy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe not a simple-minded fool, but a grifter targeting simple-minded fools. There is a big market for these dumbed-down greed, anger, and delusion narratives.

News flash...the vast majority of voters, regardless of party, are simple-minded fools that can't really be bothered with detailed Liz Warren style proposals. Targeting them is called campaigning. It isn't a dissertation defense.

He is saying stupid things. Very stupid things showing no understanding of any policy issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe not a simple-minded fool, but a grifter targeting simple-minded fools. There is a big market for these dumbed-down greed, anger, and delusion narratives.

News flash...the vast majority of voters, regardless of party, are simple-minded fools that can't really be bothered with detailed Liz Warren style proposals. Targeting them is called campaigning. It isn't a dissertation defense.

He is saying stupid things. Very stupid things showing no understanding of any policy issues.

What stupid things? You know how many very stupid things were said on the campaign trail by both major-party candidates in 2020?

Not even sure what you're referring to, but he's not running to be Chief Policy Advisor of the U.S. You hire that crap out. He's running for President. All he needs right now is to set the tone, to hit on themes that resonate with people and traction to get on the debate state. He's trying to appeal to values and common sense, in a way that resonates. Leave the wonkery to DC types he can eventually hire if he gets enough traction to put a cute little "issues" page on his website and policy proposals that you can have fun eviscerating.

This dude is not a politician; not even sure he actually wants to be President. His campaign is in startup mode right now and things can look a little funky in the beginning stages of a startup, especially for an outsider without a name brand. Andrew Yang became relevant by 4 chan memes, random podcasts and some twitter exuberance. Vivek needs to find a similar path, because I don't think he's rich enough to just bankroll the whole thing like a Tom Steyer. He's already a little ahead in that regard, because Fox and others have been giving him airtime, but I don't think he has as fervent a fanbase as Yang did. Right now, he's just trying to get to the next milestone, for now more attention and visibility; eventually getting on debate stages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe not a simple-minded fool, but a grifter targeting simple-minded fools. There is a big market for these dumbed-down greed, anger, and delusion narratives.

News flash...the vast majority of voters, regardless of party, are simple-minded fools that can't really be bothered with detailed Liz Warren style proposals. Targeting them is called campaigning. It isn't a dissertation defense.

He is saying stupid things. Very stupid things showing no understanding of any policy issues.

What stupid things? You know how many very stupid things were said on the campaign trail by both major-party candidates in 2020?

Not even sure what you're referring to, but he's not running to be Chief Policy Advisor of the U.S. You hire that crap out. He's running for President. All he needs right now is to set the tone, to hit on themes that resonate with people and traction to get on the debate state. He's trying to appeal to values and common sense, in a way that resonates. Leave the wonkery to DC types he can eventually hire if he gets enough traction to put a cute little "issues" page on his website and policy proposals that you can have fun eviscerating.

This dude is not a politician; not even sure he actually wants to be President. His campaign is in startup mode right now and things can look a little funky in the beginning stages of a startup, especially for an outsider without a name brand. Andrew Yang became relevant by 4 chan memes, random podcasts and some twitter exuberance. Vivek needs to find a similar path, because I don't think he's rich enough to just bankroll the whole thing like a Tom Steyer. He's already a little ahead in that regard, because Fox and others have been giving him airtime, but I don't think he has as fervent a fanbase as Yang did. Right now, he's just trying to get to the next milestone, for now more attention and visibility; eventually getting on debate stages.

Anyone claiming that eliminating the Department of Education is a solution for anything is not a serious person. The President is head of the government. This narcissist knows nothing about government. He’s just a literate version of MTG. None of his points are even original. It’s the same stupid shit that the dumbest Republican have been saying for 40 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe not a simple-minded fool, but a grifter targeting simple-minded fools. There is a big market for these dumbed-down greed, anger, and delusion narratives.

News flash...the vast majority of voters, regardless of party, are simple-minded fools that can't really be bothered with detailed Liz Warren style proposals. Targeting them is called campaigning. It isn't a dissertation defense.

He is saying stupid things. Very stupid things showing no understanding of any policy issues.

What stupid things? You know how many very stupid things were said on the campaign trail by both major-party candidates in 2020?

Not even sure what you're referring to, but he's not running to be Chief Policy Advisor of the U.S. You hire that crap out. He's running for President. All he needs right now is to set the tone, to hit on themes that resonate with people and traction to get on the debate state. He's trying to appeal to values and common sense, in a way that resonates. Leave the wonkery to DC types he can eventually hire if he gets enough traction to put a cute little "issues" page on his website and policy proposals that you can have fun eviscerating.

This dude is not a politician; not even sure he actually wants to be President. His campaign is in startup mode right now and things can look a little funky in the beginning stages of a startup, especially for an outsider without a name brand. Andrew Yang became relevant by 4 chan memes, random podcasts and some twitter exuberance. Vivek needs to find a similar path, because I don't think he's rich enough to just bankroll the whole thing like a Tom Steyer. He's already a little ahead in that regard, because Fox and others have been giving him airtime, but I don't think he has as fervent a fanbase as Yang did. Right now, he's just trying to get to the next milestone, for now more attention and visibility; eventually getting on debate stages.

Anyone claiming that eliminating the Department of Education is a solution for anything is not a serious person. The President is head of the government. This narcissist knows nothing about government. He’s just a literate version of MTG. None of his points are even original. It’s the same stupid shit that the dumbest Republican have been saying for 40 years.

You yourself said eliminating the DOE is an old Republican talking point that has been adopted by many. Education also happens to be at the fore of people's minds, because it's becoming the battlefield for many cultural touch points which, you guessed it, generate buzz for a campaign. What else ya got?

Everyone who runs for President likely has narcissistic tendencies. What else ya got?

He is trying to harken and appeal back to what were once foundational, core American values that made the country great, so I'm not sure what originality has to do with anything. What else ya got?

[Anonymous]

Just donated.