Vivek Ramaswamy Presidential candidate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s an immigrant of color. The GOP doesn’t want him.

You’re projecting. We do, it’s the dems who don’t want him because he wrecks your favorite racist political narrative.

[Anonymous]

He is so very full of it. There is no such thing as merit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He won’t last campaigning in Iowa

He’s vegetarian

Dude will need to have a chef travel with him or he’s gonna get sick due to nutritional deficiency

He also has an odd voice if u know what I mean

You're right. No vegetarians live in Iowa.

Not ones that have to keep a presidential campaign schedule for close to year

Booker did it but he’s more robust.

Unless you’ve attempted to campaign in Iowa on a potus schedule as a vegetarian, you won’t understand

[Anonymous]

Sounds like another simple-minded dumbass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.

You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.

I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.

I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

Smart people can be very stupid in practical matters, and he seems to exemplify that in spades. Go to his Twitter feed if you need proof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.

You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.

I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.

I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.

Americans have *real* problems! ESG and overturning affirmative action are not going to solve their problems. He is out of touch with real Americans. But hey good luck. You’re clearly a supporter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.

You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.

I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.

I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.

Anti-ESG is pro-nepotism, class privilege, caste privilege, clan privilege, sect privilege, and transactional pay to play privilege. There is no meritocracy anywhere at anytime, and especially not among the anti-ESG patronage network.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.

Where is affirmative action affecting GOP voters? Some elite college that they mock and dismiss? Maybe a few one percenters but who else?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.

You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.

I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.

I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.

Americans have *real* problems! ESG and overturning affirmative action are not going to solve their problems. He is out of touch with real Americans. But hey good luck. You’re clearly a supporter.

Not really a supporter, I just know that he's a very bright guy and not Marianne Williamson. Does that make him a good politician? Remains to be seen, but he can definitely work on his craft. Mitt Romney is bright, but has difficulty connecting with people. It happens.

As far as AA and ESG, he is fighting an uphill battle to get on the debate stages. He needs attention and visibility, ASAP. Party apparatuses and debate networks are not exactly favorable to outsider candidates. The more I see his name, the more it looks like that strategy is at least yielding some positive dividends for the stage of his campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.

You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.

I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.

I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.

Americans have *real* problems! ESG and overturning affirmative action are not going to solve their problems. He is out of touch with real Americans. But hey good luck. You’re clearly a supporter.

Not really a supporter, I just know that he's a very bright guy and not Marianne Williamson. Does that make him a good politician? Remains to be seen, but he can definitely work on his craft. Mitt Romney is bright, but has difficulty connecting with people. It happens.

As far as AA and ESG, he is fighting an uphill battle to get on the debate stages. He needs attention and visibility, ASAP. Party apparatuses and debate networks are not exactly favorable to outsider candidates. The more I see his name, the more it looks like that strategy is at least yielding some positive dividends for the stage of his campaign.

In other words he is race-baiting to get the big white grievance donor money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

Smart people can be very stupid in practical matters, and he seems to exemplify that in spades. Go to his Twitter feed if you need proof.

To me, this is just another way of saying he's inexperienced at politics, which I would agree with.

Then again, all of the "expert class" were horribly wrong about Trump. I don't think Vivek has the natural "stuff" to pull off what Trump did.

Obama himself, who is lauded as some type of political phenom, was very awkward and professorial (yes, more than he still is) with his delivery when he first got into politics. Abner Mikva and others had to tell him to knock it off and go to a black church to learn how to communicate with people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I guess he's the Republican equivalent of Marianne Williamson?

Nah, he's way smarter than Marianne.

Debatable. He’s pretty pedestrian.

I know him. He's very smart, whatever else you want to say about him.

If his only schtick is to do away with affirmative action, it tells me he lacks historical knowledge and isn’t a big thinker. Pedestrian.

You're not paying attention if you call that his only schtick, so no use. Anti-ESG has been his schtick for a while. He even built an asset management firm based on the schtick.

I've actually had in depth convos with both him and Marianne. He is levels above. He needs to refine his political craft, but he's no Marianne.

I guarantee he could think and talk circles around you.

Americans have *real* problems! ESG and overturning affirmative action are not going to solve their problems. He is out of touch with real Americans. But hey good luck. You’re clearly a supporter.

Not really a supporter, I just know that he's a very bright guy and not Marianne Williamson. Does that make him a good politician? Remains to be seen, but he can definitely work on his craft. Mitt Romney is bright, but has difficulty connecting with people. It happens.

As far as AA and ESG, he is fighting an uphill battle to get on the debate stages. He needs attention and visibility, ASAP. Party apparatuses and debate networks are not exactly favorable to outsider candidates. The more I see his name, the more it looks like that strategy is at least yielding some positive dividends for the stage of his campaign.

In other words he is race-baiting to get the big white grievance donor money.

Erm....sure, if that makes you happy. Hope you feel better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love the guy. If elected, he will end affirmative action by EO on day one.

So many other reasons to like his vision!

Who…do you think E.Os apply to exactly?