The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping

[Anonymous]

It is Tucker Carlson form of Male Prostituting to earn a living.

[Anonymous]

I can't believe people are actually buying Tucker's crap. We all saw what happened in real time. They were not tourists, they did not just wander into the Capitol. Ashli Babbit got shot after multiple warnings;she was not "murdered".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe people are actually buying Tucker's crap. We all saw what happened in real time. They were not tourists, they did not just wander into the Capitol. Ashli Babbit got shot after multiple warnings;she was not "murdered".

There are many stupid people in this country. The existence of Tucker's show proves it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So… if I rob a bank, and the police are there and don’t stop me as I do it… does that mean I didn’t commit a crime?
Serious question.

Robbing a bank is a crime. Being shown around the Capitol by police is not.

No one is being charged with being led around the Capitol by police.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually Carlson is exposing obvious lies by the partisan J6 crew.

Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

And Schumer is trying to stop Fox News from airing more tonight. Run Chuck, RUN

Schumer is doing nothing of the sort. The outlet is free to do as it is. He is right to call out the BS though. If Fox doesn't want to be called out for it, then it shouldn't give Carlson a platform. They do, and they will be held accountable for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

Let’s say the Feds had no idea that footage existed. Now they do. New trial?

That's not the question. You keep saying it was deliberately withheld. What's your evidence of that? DOJ created a huge database for January 6 and let the defendants lawyers have full access to it. It included tons of video. So what is your evidence that they didn't get any relevant video?

Do they have the same manpower to go through it? Did the prosecution know that video existed? If the prosecution had evidence in video format that could be exculpatory, that should also be provided to the defense.

I'm sure they did not have the same manpower. So what? They were given access to all of the material evidence, including material exculpatory evidence, in a gigantic discovery database. Those are the facts and it complied with the law.

The morality of the left Your best day as a prosecutor should be the day you turn over evidence that clears a man or woman.

If there is video evidence of crimes, then what video evidence that Carlson has, would obviate said evidence?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

Crickets....

Was it presented at trial to the jury?

So you have no evidence at all for your wild accusations.

It was not. Can you provide evidence that video was shown to the jury please?

you realize these court cases are online and being tweeted by court reporters, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't believe people are actually buying Tucker's crap. We all saw what happened in real time. They were not tourists, they did not just wander into the Capitol. Ashli Babbit got shot after multiple warnings;she was not "murdered".

This. I have a (former) co-worker in the farther out burbs who literally tried to tell us this was a family-friendly event the day after!

Wtf are you kidding? We actually live here, and saw many of the vile scum in real time. My kids classmates had parents call to say goodbye, because they thought they may not survive the onslaught of this violent mob, and it was painfully clear our then president had made sure there was no intervention and no reinforcements.
You don’t get to rewrite history on this one!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

And every person prosecuted unfairly on this BS is in pain too, as are their families

Then don't do the crime. If they have been prosecuted and been found guilty, that is our system.

When the jury doesn’t have all the information, it’s a huge problem. You and I both know that. I’m just the one who believes in fair trials, not you

No jury is presented with 44,000 or 14,000 hours of videotape. By the prosecution or the defense.

Defense should have what the prosecution has. If Pelosi withheld anything, that’s on the Dems

Pelosi bastardized Congress to run a partisan hack job.

If there's a crime it's for prosecutors to prosecute, not for a media circus with little credibility and much --as we're niw seeing-- censorship.

Is it a crime to damage the Capitol building to the tune of $1.5 million? Is it a crime to attack officers so brutally they lose body parts? Yes or no?

[Anonymous]

It’s too funny watching the Trumpers find out how the criminal justice system they wanted actually works. Suddenly they want more resources for defense counsel, open file discovery, and narrow criminal laws. Guess what folks, liberals have been trying to get this for a very long time and the republicans have fought it tooth and nail and claiming it was all “soft on crime.” Of course, yesterday they were buying into the GOPs demagoguery on the DC crime bill, so it doesn’t seem like they learned anything.

[Anonymous]

GOP senators, including Mitch McConnell, are pushing back on Tucker’s lies.

“Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and other Senate Republicans on Tuesday lashed out at conservative Fox News host Tucker Carlson after he characterized the deadly Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol as "mostly peaceful chaos."

At a GOP leadership press conference, McConnell said he wanted to associate himself with the letter sent to the U.S. Capitol Police force by Chief Thomas Manger, who denounced Carlson for spreading “offensive and misleading conclusions” about the Jan. 6 insurrection, including a “disturbing accusation” that Officer Brian Sicknick’s death had nothing to do with the riot.”
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna73764

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

Let’s say the Feds had no idea that footage existed. Now they do. New trial?

That's not the question. You keep saying it was deliberately withheld. What's your evidence of that? DOJ created a huge database for January 6 and let the defendants lawyers have full access to it. It included tons of video. So what is your evidence that they didn't get any relevant video?

Do they have the same manpower to go through it? Did the prosecution know that video existed? If the prosecution had evidence in video format that could be exculpatory, that should also be provided to the defense.

I'm sure they did not have the same manpower. So what? They were given access to all of the material evidence, including material exculpatory evidence, in a gigantic discovery database. Those are the facts and it complied with the law.

The morality of the left Your best day as a prosecutor should be the day you turn over evidence that clears a man or woman.

Are you aware that "the left" has been fighting for decades for more resources for criminal defendants, and they've been blocked at every turn by conservatives? Suddenly it's a huge issue for conservatives when a bunch of people they like are the defendants. But you don't a flying f^ck about the poor black folk who are ground down by this system every day.

What I see is a video that could change a sentence but it was never shown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

Crickets....

Was it presented at trial to the jury?

So you have no evidence at all for your wild accusations.

It was not. Can you provide evidence that video was shown to the jury please?

I don't know what video you are talking about. There are lots of reasons a video might be not be shown to a jury. Defense counsel may not have wanted to. Or maybe they didn't find it. Or maybe the judge ruled it was not admissible. Even if this video that you haven't identified wasn't shown to the jury, it doesn't mean it wasn't made available to defense counsel.

The video of multiple police officers with the Shaman and him praying for them. The one Tucker showed. Can you prove that it was shown to the jury, yes or no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this.

I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/

JFC dude.

Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.

Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay.

Reasonable? Are you 10?

So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere?

Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled!

That's how our system works.

Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.

The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee.

The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.

What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?

Crickets....

Was it presented at trial to the jury?

So you have no evidence at all for your wild accusations.

It was not. Can you provide evidence that video was shown to the jury please?

I don't know what video you are talking about. There are lots of reasons a video might be not be shown to a jury. Defense counsel may not have wanted to. Or maybe they didn't find it. Or maybe the judge ruled it was not admissible. Even if this video that you haven't identified wasn't shown to the jury, it doesn't mean it wasn't made available to defense counsel.

I think they are talking about the video of the 'shaman". i have no idea if the defense had it or if they did, whether it was shown to the jury. It is possible that they do not have it.

Well if it was for the Shaman, then it obviously was not shown to a jury because that guy pleaded guilty.

He’s been diagnosed with schizophrenia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually Carlson is exposing obvious lies by the partisan J6 crew.

Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

And Schumer is trying to stop Fox News from airing more tonight. Run Chuck, RUN

Schumer is doing nothing of the sort. The outlet is free to do as it is. He is right to call out the BS though. If Fox doesn't want to be called out for it, then it shouldn't give Carlson a platform. They do, and they will be held accountable for it.

He specifically stated that Fox News should not air more video tonight