Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this. [/quote] I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/ JFC dude.[/quote] Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.[/quote] Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay. Reasonable? Are you 10?[/quote] So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere? [/quote] Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled! That's how our system works. [/quote] Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.[/quote] The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee. [/quote] The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.[/quote] What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?[/quote] Let’s say the Feds had no idea that footage existed. Now they do. New trial?[/quote] That's not the question. You keep saying it was deliberately withheld. What's your evidence of that? DOJ created a huge database for January 6 and let the defendants lawyers have full access to it. It included tons of video. So what is your evidence that they didn't get any relevant video?[/quote] Do they have the same manpower to go through it? Did the prosecution know that video existed? If the prosecution had evidence in video format that could be exculpatory, that should also be provided to the defense. [/quote] I'm sure they did not have the same manpower. So what? They were given access to all of the material evidence, including material exculpatory evidence, in a gigantic discovery database. Those are the facts and it complied with the law. [/quote] The morality of the left :mrgreen: Your best day as a prosecutor should be the day you turn over evidence that clears a man or woman.[/quote] If there is video evidence of crimes, then what video evidence that Carlson has, would obviate said evidence?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics