Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They arrested and jailed that guy for being escorted throughout the Capitol by the police. There’s something seriously wrong with all of this. [/quote] I know. What reasonable person WOULDN’T think he was just taking a tour in that environment. /s/ JFC dude.[/quote] Doesn’t matter. If an officer is escorting you around, it’s reasonable to think it’s all ok.[/quote] Uh, no, if you break into a building and a police officer follows you but does not tackle you, that doesn't make it okay. Reasonable? Are you 10?[/quote] So you maintain the officer knew he broke the law and was simply following him, knowing there were cameras everywhere? [/quote] Maintain what? He was arrested, charged, and convicted. All without being tackled! That's how our system works. [/quote] Again, if the evidence was withheld, no, it’s not how our system works. That video should have been handed to the defense by prosecution.[/quote] The videos that Carlson showed were shown to the defense and the prosecution. He didn't put up new stuff - he hasn't gone through 44,000 hours of videos to find any gotcha stuff because that's a tremendous amount of footage and the gotcha footage has already been by the J6 committee. [/quote] The prosecution, with their many, many lawyers, knew that video existed and deliberately withheld it from defense.[/quote] What is your evidence that anything relevant was withheld?[/quote] Crickets....[/quote] Was it presented at trial to the jury?[/quote] So you have no evidence at all for your wild accusations.[/quote] It was not. Can you provide evidence that video was shown to the jury please? [/quote] I don't know what video you are talking about. There are lots of reasons a video might be not be shown to a jury. Defense counsel may not have wanted to. Or maybe they didn't find it. Or maybe the judge ruled it was not admissible. Even if this video that you haven't identified wasn't shown to the jury, it doesn't mean it wasn't made available to defense counsel.[/quote] I think they are talking about the video of the 'shaman". i have no idea if the defense had it or if they did, whether it was shown to the jury. It is possible that they do not have it.[/quote] Well if it was for the Shaman, then it obviously was not shown to a jury because that guy pleaded guilty. [/quote] He’s been diagnosed with schizophrenia. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics