The Tucker Carlson videos are dropping

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is all about exposing the security apparatus in the US Capitol to our adversaries. Those of you getting upset about this need to remember, Kevin MCCarthy ONLY gave this footage to Tucker Carlson, not to all media outlets writ large.

And, Tucker Carlson, like other Fox "News" hosts, are entertainment and not news. They all admitted they KNEW the election was fair and they KNEW what they were doing in terms of suggesting the insurrection was legitimate.

And yet, here you are believing them and their on camera persona and not the texts disclosed in court where they were literally laughing at how stupid and gullible their viewers were (and apparently, are)

Bullcrap.
The team that reviewed this video consulted with Capitol Police about the footage they planned to air. They only had a few, reasonable issues.
In the end, they blurred a door entrance in the released footage.

In other words..... the footage that was aired was approved by the police charged with protecting the Capitol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is truly eye-opening.

Since the committee was willing to lie about this, nothing they say is trustworthy. Nothing.

Details (this isn't a new issue):

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/evidence-gop-rep-loudermilk-gave-reconnaissance-tours-jan/story?id=85387269

The J6 committee didn't lie, but they were not kind in the letter to Loudermilk. He led a large tour group, when the building was closed to tours because of covid, and one of those people stormed the Capitol the next day. Loudermilk was consorting with a future insurrectionist.

From your link....

"that included nearby office building but not the Capitol itself"

He did NOT take anyone on a tour of the Capitol building which is very different than what the J6 committee accused him of.
They lied.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Democrats were hiding the truth for two years, while innocent American protesters can’t get their cancer treatment in the DC gulag. This is a human rights atrocity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is truly eye-opening.

Since the committee was willing to lie about this, nothing they say is trustworthy. Nothing.

Details (this isn't a new issue):

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/evidence-gop-rep-loudermilk-gave-reconnaissance-tours-jan/story?id=85387269

The J6 committee didn't lie, but they were not kind in the letter to Loudermilk. He led a large tour group, when the building was closed to tours because of covid, and one of those people stormed the Capitol the next day. Loudermilk was consorting with a future insurrectionist.

From your link....

"that included nearby office building but not the Capitol itself"

He did NOT take anyone on a tour of the Capitol building which is very different than what the J6 committee accused him of.
They lied.

So you think if the coup had been successful that they would not have expanded farther into the area?

What the committee accused Loudermilk of was giving a tour to people who stormed the Capitol the next day. Which is what he did.

[Anonymous]

This won't change anyone's mind.

It does show how someone can take the same footage and tell two different stories. I'm not saying either is correct unless you have access to the entire unedited feed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is truly eye-opening.

Since the committee was willing to lie about this, nothing they say is trustworthy. Nothing.

Details (this isn't a new issue):

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/evidence-gop-rep-loudermilk-gave-reconnaissance-tours-jan/story?id=85387269

The J6 committee didn't lie, but they were not kind in the letter to Loudermilk. He led a large tour group, when the building was closed to tours because of covid, and one of those people stormed the Capitol the next day. Loudermilk was consorting with a future insurrectionist.

From your link....

"that included nearby office building but not the Capitol itself"

He did NOT take anyone on a tour of the Capitol building which is very different than what the J6 committee accused him of.
They lied.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Big eye in the sky doesn’t lie. There is a reason very few politicians wanted those tapes released.
How many politicians raised money off this “issue”? If you don’t think politicians will use any means necessary to stay elected…such a shame. I wish to throw them all out and get back to people “serving” vs making it a career.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We were mislead by the Democrats and their surrogates in the media (including this board)

No, you are swallowing up right wing misinformation from someone who literally laughed about sharing BS and misinformation.

[Anonymous]

Individual police officers may also be MAGA.
Let's ask those officers why they didn't tackle him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is all about exposing the security apparatus in the US Capitol to our adversaries. Those of you getting upset about this need to remember, Kevin MCCarthy ONLY gave this footage to Tucker Carlson, not to all media outlets writ large.

And, Tucker Carlson, like other Fox "News" hosts, are entertainment and not news. They all admitted they KNEW the election was fair and they KNEW what they were doing in terms of suggesting the insurrection was legitimate.

And yet, here you are believing them and their on camera persona and not the texts disclosed in court where they were literally laughing at how stupid and gullible their viewers were (and apparently, are)

Bullcrap.
The team that reviewed this video consulted with Capitol Police about the footage they planned to air. They only had a few, reasonable issues.
In the end, they blurred a door entrance in the released footage.

In other words..... the footage that was aired was approved by the police charged with protecting the Capitol.

The Capitol Police have been unequivcol in not wanting all of these video files to be released, and yet McCarthy did it anyway, and not to ALL media, but to one media outlet, the one being sued in court for defmation whose depositions rise to the tough standards set by Sullivan v NY Times.

Why not release it to the public in general if you are going to do it at all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Big eye in the sky doesn’t lie. There is a reason very few politicians wanted those tapes released.
How many politicians raised money off this “issue”? If you don’t think politicians will use any means necessary to stay elected…such a shame. I wish to throw them all out and get back to people “serving” vs making it a career.

Wow you really hate the Capitol police officers that much that you dismiss their experience as an “issue”? Have you ever lost a finger or eye to a mob? What about 3 fingers? You think that’s an “issue” in quotes to lose three fingers or an eye? Horrid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is truly eye-opening.

Since the committee was willing to lie about this, nothing they say is trustworthy. Nothing.

Details (this isn't a new issue):

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/evidence-gop-rep-loudermilk-gave-reconnaissance-tours-jan/story?id=85387269

The J6 committee didn't lie, but they were not kind in the letter to Loudermilk. He led a large tour group, when the building was closed to tours because of covid, and one of those people stormed the Capitol the next day. Loudermilk was consorting with a future insurrectionist.

From your link....

"that included nearby office building but not the Capitol itself"

He did NOT take anyone on a tour of the Capitol building which is very different than what the J6 committee accused him of.
They lied.

1) he broke the house rules
2) it is pretty cler that different sympathetic House members gave tours to different people. That is how Intel works, different people gathering different evidence and comparing notes before formulating their plan. Remember, they wanted to take the tunnels - the tunnels that connect the Capitol building to the different complex office buildings.

So, why do you think he or anyone else involved should get a pass?

[Anonymous]

bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:bLuE lIvEs mAtTeR

This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.

It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?

The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.

This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.

Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.

It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?

The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.

This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.

Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.

Have you ever considered, just for a moment, that the family is right, the story is right, the video shows that the family is right, as well as the autopsy, and because you are getting your information from Fox "we laugh at our stupid viewers" News, maybe, just maybe YOU are wrong?