I'm not OP. And, as many other people on this discussion have agreed with me, reception/ceremony in the same venue is not typical. Nor is providing transportation. And criticizing those norms as "cheap ass- weddings" is offensive and insulting. So I stand by the smug pricks comment. You folks need to get out of your bubble a bit more and realize that other people do things differently and "cheap" has nothing to do with it. |
But is there decent parking??? Why is OP avoiding this simple question?? |
| We did not provide transport between our two venues but it was suburban and had ample free parking at both. Everyone needed a car anyway. |
| I knew a couple who got married in a synagogue in central DC and then wanted to ride the metro to the reception venue. They provided metro tickets to all guests and then had charming photos of the bride and groom riding the metro. I thought it was kind of gimmicky. They said they were city people and wanted that vibe throughout. Got written up in the Post too. |
OP never returned. Why do you think they’ll be back to answer your parking question? |
| You’ll get mixed opinions here. But I found that the transportation wasn’t actually all that expensive. |
| Op - you know your guest list. Talk to them. |
| Have knowledge of who needs help. Talk about how they can be helped. |
There are a couple of issues: 1.) The walk is longer than OP says it will be (pointed out by at least one other PP). People who are dressed for a wedding will find this unacceptable. 2.) Wedding attire and walking attire are very different. When is the last time you went walking any distance, and experienced people in wedding attire while out on your walk?? (ie: NOT people who stepped outside to take photos at a venue). 3.) Most people will not answer you straight, if you were to ask them a question like this - they don't want to appear rude or needy, or appear to be the "only" guest who wants transportation. Therefore, only the one or two elderly guests who are still alive will get the proper transportation. People would not ask old people, they would just give them transportation, in a situation where it is suspected (OP will not come out and say it) that the parking sucks. 4.) Everyone or no one should get transportation, especially if the parking sucks. It would be considered rude otherwise, and you will be remembered as "that bride". Since you asked. |
|
Summer in DC + walking = Sweaty guests
Also, what if it rains? |
| If you choose separate locations in DC in the summer you must provide transportation. Just from the standpoint of setting up for a fun reception, one wants to get to your reception venue hot and thirsty with hurting feet. |
+1. And it’s hot and muggy in DC then. We hired two trolleys for guests at our wedding =big hit |
I think this is the key distinction. I grew up in upstate NY and providing transportation was not a thing. Everyone was driving and there was ample parking at every event location. Being in an urban area where there likely is not ample parking at each event location, and with guests who may be out of towners and unfamiliar with DC, I think the right thing to do is to rent some vans or some small buses to take people to and from the reception. |
+1 I think the key OP, is NOT deciding for yourself who needs what. You need to offer the transportation to everyone. It is simply not fair to expect some guests to walk, and not others. No one, regardless of age or whatever, wants to walk in heels, dressed up for a wedding - it's NOT just an old person thing. Get it? |
I love this. |