Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Hardly. She never said the door was added May 2012, but rather that is when she told of the incident in counseling, *after* major home renovation had been completed. Maybe the door was early on in the project and other work followed.

She brought up the door as a key point for the marriage counseling.

Yes and that adds up. The door was added before the counseling where she told of what happened. Honestly Inciuldnt care less if he assaulted her or not but acting like this somehow disproves her timeline is wrong. One is before the other just as she said. Her statement was no more specific so it is what it is.

Except if the door is what drove them into marriage counseling, as she said, then why wait four years?

She did not actually say that. Strike 400.

I would go back and listen to her testimony:

Ford, 51, said in her opening statement at the public hearing, “I had never told the details to anyone until May 2012, during a couple’s counseling session. The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband [Russell Ford] and I had completed an extensive remodel of our home, and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand.”

She continued, “In explaining why I wanted to have a second front door, I described the assault in detail. I recall saying that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S. Supreme Court and spoke a bit about his background. My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh.”


The door was added in 2008. Came up in marriage counseling in 2012.

So she's saying that in 2008 she explained the attack and reason for the second front door to her husband and he still rejected the idea and could not understand and it needed to be drug up in marriage counseling four years later? What?

And once again, the second front door was part of a garage to apartment conversion to host google interns, to give them a private entrance. WTF does that have to do with fear?

[Anonymous]

The Hill is reporting that the WH is limiting the FBI to looking into just the Dr Ford and Deborah Ramirez allegations. In addition the FBI can only talk to witnesses on a list approved by the WH Counsel. What kind of FBI investigation is this? The second condition is stupid
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/409100-white-house-limiting-scope-of-fbi-investigation%3famp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

Seems like a SCOTUS nominee should know this:

"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is a Latin phrase meaning "false in one thing, false in everything." At common law, it is the legal principle that a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter."

Delivered by BLUMENTHAL. I just can't

You can't what? Have respect for a veteran? We already know that.

Not one who lied about his service.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d bet everything that Kavanaugh regrets what he said I. Response particularly to Whitehouse. HS and college pals are inevitably going to show him to have perjured regarding drunkenness and slang. Perjury is perjury.

You sound ridiculous. Perjured himself with regard to slang?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

Seems like a SCOTUS nominee should know this:

"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is a Latin phrase meaning "false in one thing, false in everything." At common law, it is the legal principle that a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter."

Delivered by BLUMENTHAL. I just can't

You can't what? Have respect for a veteran? We already know that.

Didn't he LIE about that? Yes, he did. What was it exactly?

Not sure why, but he was "vague" about whether or not he served in Vietnam.

https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/nyregion/18blumenthal.html

[Anonymous]

So.

The FBI doesn't really like the White House right now because of all the nice things Trump said about the FBI this year.

Yet the FBI is supposed to conduct an investigation within the constraints of the White House.

I'm thinking there might be some liberties taken with the impositions of the White House.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d bet everything that Kavanaugh regrets what he said I. Response particularly to Whitehouse. HS and college pals are inevitably going to show him to have perjured regarding drunkenness and slang. Perjury is perjury.

You sound ridiculous. Perjured himself with regard to slang?

No, with regard to lying. But I guess it's NBD nowadays.

[Anonymous]

Clarence Thomas: my hearing was really bad.

Brett: Hold my beers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d bet everything that Kavanaugh regrets what he said I. Response particularly to Whitehouse. HS and college pals are inevitably going to show him to have perjured regarding drunkenness and slang. Perjury is perjury.

He could correct the record. If he wanted to.

He can’t. It’s still perjury. He’s claiming spicy food led to ralphing as drinking did. He said Devil’s Triangle was quarters, and that’s enormous bullshit. Boofing, Renate. If the FBI asks ANY guilty-feeling asshole “Alumnius,” it’s perjury. And it IS perjury and even Renate knows it! (Now). Hell, he even perjured himself as he wept over his “65” supporters when Renate had already made a statement after realizing they shamed her!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clarence Thomas: my hearing was really bad.

Brett: Hold my beers.

Love your plural, lady. Ha!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

Seems like a SCOTUS nominee should know this:

"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is a Latin phrase meaning "false in one thing, false in everything." At common law, it is the legal principle that a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter."

Delivered by BLUMENTHAL. I just can't

You can't what? Have respect for a veteran? We already know that.

Didn't he LIE about that? Yes, he did. What was it exactly?

You're saying that because Blumenthal lied about his service, that it's fine for a future Supreme Court justice to lie under oath, about minor details or major issues.

Got it.

It does seem a bit presumptuous and cocky of Sen. Blumenthal to be sitting in judgment of anyone else's truthfulness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d bet everything that Kavanaugh regrets what he said I. Response particularly to Whitehouse. HS and college pals are inevitably going to show him to have perjured regarding drunkenness and slang. Perjury is perjury.

You sound ridiculous. Perjured himself with regard to slang?

No, with regard to lying. But I guess it's NBD nowadays.

How can you be so sure about the lying about the slang? Do you know for a certainty that "boof" had that meaning in 1982? Please cite source.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Hill is reporting that the WH is limiting the FBI to looking into just the Dr Ford and Deborah Ramirez allegations. In addition the FBI can only talk to witnesses on a list approved by the WH Counsel. What kind of FBI investigation is this? The second condition is stupid
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/409100-white-house-limiting-scope-of-fbi-investigation%3famp

Yep, investigating the third accuser seems a bit pointless given her record:

https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/index.ssf/2018/09/julie_swetnick_one_of_kavanaug.html

Obviously an accuser with sterling credentials!

[Anonymous]

Whitehouse was the Senator that tipped of the media as to the false rape/Newport RI/Boat accusation that came to him through a member of the Justice Dept, who's now being investigated himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Hill is reporting that the WH is limiting the FBI to looking into just the Dr Ford and Deborah Ramirez allegations. In addition the FBI can only talk to witnesses on a list approved by the WH Counsel. What kind of FBI investigation is this? The second condition is stupid
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/409100-white-house-limiting-scope-of-fbi-investigation%3famp

Yep, investigating the third accuser seems a bit pointless given her record:

https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/index.ssf/2018/09/julie_swetnick_one_of_kavanaug.html

Obviously an accuser with sterling credentials!

You're conveniently ignoring other accounts that corroborate hers, from Rasor and from classmates.