Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

She brought up the door as a key point for the marriage counseling.

yes, I read that statement. Couples counseling for a renovation? Maybe, that's a good idea, but we worked it out on our own. I guess that's the California solution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Gateway pundit. God, you guys are sad.

The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and IHAD COMPLETEDa very extensive, very long remodel of our home, and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand. In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe the assault in detail.

So what if it was earlier? She didn't say they were in couples counseling BECAUSE of the front door - just that it came up in the course of the counseling.

Why do you go find out when Mark Judge worked at the Safeway? Or how Ed Whelan knew her identity before the public?

How many years later? The door is to a converted garage/apartment for google interns - that's why the remodel was done.

The above link is very damaging.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She brought up the door as a key point for the marriage counseling.

yes, I read that statement. Couples counseling for a renovation? Maybe, that's a good idea, but we worked it out on our own. I guess that's the California solution.

Totally sounds like California.

But still think there are a number of discrepancies in the remodel, second door story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The prosecutor who interviewed Ford and Kavanaugh said there wasn't even enough there to get a search warrant executed for Kavanaugh.

It’s not a criminal trial. Nobody was looking for a search warrant. That’s not the standard.

What she's saying is that Ford presented no proof that her story held water.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Hardly. She never said the door was added May 2012, but rather that is when she told of the incident in counseling, *after* major home renovation had been completed. Maybe the door was early on in the project and other work followed.

She brought up the door as a key point for the marriage counseling.

Yes and that adds up. The door was added before the counseling where she told of what happened. Honestly Inciuldnt care less if he assaulted her or not but acting like this somehow disproves her timeline is wrong. One is before the other just as she said. Her statement was no more specific so it is what it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Hardly. She never said the door was added May 2012, but rather that is when she told of the incident in counseling, *after* major home renovation had been completed. Maybe the door was early on in the project and other work followed.

She brought up the door as a key point for the marriage counseling.

Yes and that adds up. The door was added before the counseling where she told of what happened. Honestly Inciuldnt care less if he assaulted her or not but acting like this somehow disproves her timeline is wrong. One is before the other just as she said. Her statement was no more specific so it is what it is.

Except if the door is what drove them into marriage counseling, as she said, then why wait four years?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Hardly. She never said the door was added May 2012, but rather that is when she told of the incident in counseling, *after* major home renovation had been completed. Maybe the door was early on in the project and other work followed.

She brought up the door as a key point for the marriage counseling.

Yes and that adds up. The door was added before the counseling where she told of what happened. Honestly Inciuldnt care less if he assaulted her or not but acting like this somehow disproves her timeline is wrong. One is before the other just as she said. Her statement was no more specific so it is what it is.

Except if the door is what drove them into marriage counseling, as she said, then why wait four years?

She did not actually say that. Strike 400.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Hardly. She never said the door was added May 2012, but rather that is when she told of the incident in counseling, *after* major home renovation had been completed. Maybe the door was early on in the project and other work followed.

She brought up the door as a key point for the marriage counseling.

Yes and that adds up. The door was added before the counseling where she told of what happened. Honestly Inciuldnt care less if he assaulted her or not but acting like this somehow disproves her timeline is wrong. One is before the other just as she said. Her statement was no more specific so it is what it is.

Except if the door is what drove them into marriage counseling, as she said, then why wait four years?

She did not actually say that. Strike 400.

Right she didn’t say they started counseling because of the door.

“I had never told the details to anyone — the specific details — until May 2012, during a couples counseling session. The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had completed a very extensive, very long remodel of our home and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand.”

[Anonymous]

What’s with the passionate vilifying of Ford? I want to understand. I don’t believe Kavanaugh, but I think this crusade has spun well beyond his control and he should stop or face even worse. I don’t want him eviscerated, nor do I discount his record with equitable promotion of clerks or anything else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

Seems like a SCOTUS nominee should know this:

"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is a Latin phrase meaning "false in one thing, false in everything." At common law, it is the legal principle that a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter."

Delivered by BLUMENTHAL. I just can't

You can't what? Have respect for a veteran? We already know that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

Seems like a SCOTUS nominee should know this:

"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is a Latin phrase meaning "false in one thing, false in everything." At common law, it is the legal principle that a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter."

Delivered by BLUMENTHAL. I just can't

You can't what? Have respect for a veteran? We already know that.

Didn't he LIE about that? Yes, he did. What was it exactly?

[Anonymous]

I’d bet everything that Kavanaugh regrets what he said I. Response particularly to Whitehouse. HS and college pals are inevitably going to show him to have perjured regarding drunkenness and slang. Perjury is perjury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

Seems like a SCOTUS nominee should know this:

"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is a Latin phrase meaning "false in one thing, false in everything." At common law, it is the legal principle that a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter."

Delivered by BLUMENTHAL. I just can't

You can't what? Have respect for a veteran? We already know that.

Didn't he LIE about that? Yes, he did. What was it exactly?

You're saying that because Blumenthal lied about his service, that it's fine for a future Supreme Court justice to lie under oath, about minor details or major issues.

Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Hardly. She never said the door was added May 2012, but rather that is when she told of the incident in counseling, *after* major home renovation had been completed. Maybe the door was early on in the project and other work followed.

She brought up the door as a key point for the marriage counseling.

Yes and that adds up. The door was added before the counseling where she told of what happened. Honestly Inciuldnt care less if he assaulted her or not but acting like this somehow disproves her timeline is wrong. One is before the other just as she said. Her statement was no more specific so it is what it is.

Except if the door is what drove them into marriage counseling, as she said, then why wait four years?

She did not actually say that. Strike 400.

This is her testimony:

I had never told the details to anyone until May 2012, during a couples counseling session. The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had completed an extensive remodel of our home, and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand. In explaining why I wanted to have a second front door, I described the assault in detail.

So they did a remodel and the second front door was put in. Sort of finished business, so why is it coming up in couples counseling?

RF: She insists on all kinds of weird things that cost a lot of money. Like we had to put in a second front door in our house for an extra gazillion dollars.

CF: That wasn't a want! It was a need! (She has read DCUM Money and Finance and is schooled on the difference.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d bet everything that Kavanaugh regrets what he said I. Response particularly to Whitehouse. HS and college pals are inevitably going to show him to have perjured regarding drunkenness and slang. Perjury is perjury.

He could correct the record. If he wanted to.