Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Gateway pundit. God, you guys are sad.

The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and IHAD COMPLETEDa very extensive, very long remodel of our home, and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand. In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe the assault in detail.

So what if it was earlier? She didn't say they were in couples counseling BECAUSE of the front door - just that it came up in the course of the counseling.

Why do you go find out when Mark Judge worked at the Safeway? Or how Ed Whelan knew her identity before the public?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

Seems like a SCOTUS nominee should know this:

"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is a Latin phrase meaning "false in one thing, false in everything." At common law, it is the legal principle that a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Hardly. She never said the door was added May 2012, but rather that is when she told of the incident in counseling, *after* major home renovation had been completed. Maybe the door was early on in the project and other work followed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Gateway pundit. God, you guys are sad.

The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and IHAD COMPLETEDa very extensive, very long remodel of our home, and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand. In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe the assault in detail.

So what if it was earlier? She didn't say they were in couples counseling BECAUSE of the front door - just that it came up in the course of the counseling.

Why do you go find out when Mark Judge worked at the Safeway? Or how Ed Whelan knew her identity before the public?

How many years later? The door is to a converted garage/apartment for google interns - that's why the remodel was done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
"No longer confining ourselves to the walls of Landon and Prep, we plunged into the waters of St. John and Gonzaga with much success."

-Holton Arms Yearbook

They sound like a bunch of raging girls gone wild. Why didn't any adult edit this sort of filth?

Aw, with your struggle post. Have you boofed yet without preparation? (Brett can help.)

-says the Holton alum

This is silliness to try to define boofing. Have you never created a private language with good friends? We used to call people
‘Help-me” if they were uncool .... muck-muck was having sex (we were virgins) .... doe-foe was short for dumb-f#@$. There are others which would never appear in an urban or suburban dictionary. BTW I grew up 5 miles from Georgetown Prep in the same 1980’s era. I find his explanation completely believable. 15 year old boys for pete’s sake.

Not to mention that everyone's definitions of the sexual meanings of these terms comes from the 2018 Urban Dictionary. There is no way, even on the internet, to know that these terms had had those meanings 35 years ago. That is a generation ago and slang changes much faster than that.

Fag meant cigarette when I was growing up. Very few millenials today would recognize that meaning.

Kavanaugh said boofing meant flatulence. “Have you boofed yet?” What high school kid hadn't farted by age 16?

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Hardly. She never said the door was added May 2012, but rather that is when she told of the incident in counseling, *after* major home renovation had been completed. Maybe the door was early on in the project and other work followed.

She brought up the door as a key point for the marriage counseling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is so interesting that DCUM posters usually sneer at anyone who uses the "Dr." title who is not a medical doctor. Yet Ms. Ford's supporters refer to her as Dr. Ford constantly. Why is this?

I'm a regular DCUM poster who does not sneer at people using the Dr title. I especially don't sneer at women who use it, because we have been historically deprived of the respect accorded men of the same rank.

--signed, a Ph.D. (Dr. Smith to you)

Funny how DCUM "sneered" at African American DR. Ben Carson.

Your selective outrage is disingenuous.

Art history doesn’t count

MD

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

Seems like a SCOTUS nominee should know this:

"Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is a Latin phrase meaning "false in one thing, false in everything." At common law, it is the legal principle that a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter."

Delivered by BLUMENTHAL. I just can't

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking more into Ford's background:

https://twitter.com/bbusa617/status/1045879558535286785/photo/1

Uh, the guy under investigation is Kavanaugh. Don’t lose focus.

Does anything matter at all re the credibility of an accuser, or do we just accept every accuser's word, no matter what?

DP. Should we accept Qanon's word that she's a CIA operative? Or should we leave this stuff to the professionals?

[Anonymous]

The prosecutor who interviewed Ford and Kavanaugh said there wasn't even enough there to get a search warrant executed for Kavanaugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI is going to question Judge, who will deny this event with Dr. Ford took place, and then Kavanaugh will get confirmed. Despite his out of control temperament and partisan railing.

Yup. Though how anyone could believe Judge over Ford is beyond me.

Ford was wholly unbelievable, in a sad spacey sort of way. The prosecutor who interviewed her, who specialized in this area said that she would not prosecute the case based on the evidence she heard.

Here are a couple of facts for you. The prosecutor only interviewed Dr. Ford. GOP interrupted her interview of Kavanaugh. GOP did not subpoena Mark Judge to be questioned by the prosecutor. GOP refused to let her lie detector technician or her therapist to testify.

So, it is a little pretentious for the prosecutor to say she wouldn’t prosecute and it is really dishonest for GOP and republicans Kavanaugh supporter to claim there is no case.

A prosecutor only needs to interview the accuser to see if there is a winnable case. That’s how it works. Based on the evidence, is there enough to move forward with a case? She says no.

Montgomery County police also said that they would not prosecute.

Shut it, lowbrow idiot. Police agencies don't prosecute.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ford's 'second front door' tale is blown:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/breaking-christine-ford-caught-in-major-lie-photos-prove-house-updates-occurred-much-earlier-than-senate-testimony/

Bombshell revelation

Hardly. She never said the door was added May 2012, but rather that is when she told of the incident in counseling, *after* major home renovation had been completed. Maybe the door was early on in the project and other work followed.

She brought up the door as a key point for the marriage counseling.

If the door was early on in the remodel, it would have come up long before 2012.

What is the story on Gateway Pundit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The prosecutor who interviewed Ford and Kavanaugh said there wasn't even enough there to get a search warrant executed for Kavanaugh.

It’s not a criminal trial. Nobody was looking for a search warrant. That’s not the standard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
"No longer confining ourselves to the walls of Landon and Prep, we plunged into the waters of St. John and Gonzaga with much success."

-Holton Arms Yearbook

They sound like a bunch of raging girls gone wild. Why didn't any adult edit this sort of filth?

Aw, with your struggle post. Have you boofed yet without preparation? (Brett can help.)

-says the Holton alum

This is silliness to try to define boofing. Have you never created a private language with good friends? We used to call people
‘Help-me” if they were uncool .... muck-muck was having sex (we were virgins) .... doe-foe was short for dumb-f#@$. There are others which would never appear in an urban or suburban dictionary. BTW I grew up 5 miles from Georgetown Prep in the same 1980’s era. I find his explanation completely believable. 15 year old boys for pete’s sake.

Not to mention that everyone's definitions of the sexual meanings of these terms comes from the 2018 Urban Dictionary. There is no way, even on the internet, to know that these terms had had those meanings 35 years ago. That is a generation ago and slang changes much faster than that.

Fag meant cigarette when I was growing up. Very few millenials today would recognize that meaning.

Kavanaugh said boofing meant flatulence. “Have you boofed yet?” What high school kid hadn't farted by age 16?

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus sounds very clever, but it is in direct opposition to Aristotle’s prinicples of logic. Logic states liars sometimes tell the truth, and people who are generally honest can lie. It means nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The prosecutor who interviewed Ford and Kavanaugh said there wasn't even enough there to get a search warrant executed for Kavanaugh.

Duh. What would she search?

The fact that Judge wasn't there is very important. Kavanaugh knows this, too.