Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

I think Trump has something on Johnson. Given how "religious" he is and his weird online proclivities, it isn't hard to imagine what it is.

[Anonymous]

Anyone who looks at the big picture — Epstein coverup, his comments, sexually suggestive photos with minor daughter, his repugnant associates in the fake international “modeling” and “pageant” industries in the 70s, 80s, 90s, and 00s, rewarding bureaucrats who helped Epstein coverup — comes to the same conclusion. Not only a participant, it all reads like he was a key point man helping facilitate this global cesspit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump has something on Johnson. Given how "religious" he is and his weird online proclivities, it isn't hard to imagine what it is.

Anyone with gaydar can tell what that something is. They don’t let anyone rise to the top of a party unless they have you blackmailed.

[Anonymous]

Michelle Goldberg in July 14 NYT sums up how we got to this bizarre place:

“To believe that they are on the side of light while championing a man of such low character, Trump’s acolytes have had to conjure an enemy of vast and titanic evil, and invent a version of Trump that never existed.”

"The problem for Trump is that some of his followers need to choose between their commitment to him and to the narrative that justified his rise."

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/14/opinion/trump-jeffrey-epstein-files.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump has something on Johnson. Given how "religious" he is and his weird online proclivities, it isn't hard to imagine what it is.

Anyone with gaydar can tell what that something is. They don’t let anyone rise to the top of a party unless they have you blackmailed.

Bingo, especially given the adopted child. Bad stuff happened in that home.

[Anonymous]

Trump claimed he never wrote a birthday letter to Epstein with a doodle of a female nude. Now he is suing to quash the evidence he claimed doesn't exist.

Make it make sense.

[Anonymous]

Wonder how quick dcum will drop this witch hunt when they find out all those on the 'list" have a D behind their name?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Trump has something on Johnson. Given how "religious" he is and his weird online proclivities, it isn't hard to imagine what it is.

The guy is strange, for sure. Something is up.

His “roommate” thinks that the "Separation Between Church and State is a delusional lie.”



https://www.propublica.org/article/mike-johnson-evangelical-pastor-steve-berger-roommates

https://k945.com/house-speaker-mike-johnsons-d-c-stay-at-pastors-home/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump claimed he never wrote a birthday letter to Epstein with a doodle of a female nude. Now he is suing to quash the evidence he claimed doesn't exist.

Make it make sense.

Honey we would have to be in a cult to make it make sense. You know the kind of people willing to blindly follow while drinking the cyanide kool aid. Those people can make it make sense, to themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Michelle Goldberg in July 14 NYT sums up how we got to this bizarre place:

“To believe that they are on the side of light while championing a man of such low character, Trump’s acolytes have had to conjure an enemy of vast and titanic evil, and invent a version of Trump that never existed.”

"The problem for Trump is that some of his followers need to choose between their commitment to him and to the narrative that justified his rise."

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/14/opinion/trump-jeffrey-epstein-files.html

The bolded is so accurate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wonder how quick dcum will drop this witch hunt when they find out all those on the 'list" have a D behind their name?

If that was true, Pam and Kash would have released all the information, recordings, tapes, interviews, etc with lightening speed. Do better PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wonder how quick dcum will drop this witch hunt when they find out all those on the 'list" have a D behind their name?

I don't think you have a reading on the temperature at all. If there are Democrats on the list, so be it. Let them suffer the consequences. The difference is that there isn't a slavish devotion to a cult leader.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who looks at the big picture — Epstein coverup, his comments, sexually suggestive photos with minor daughter, his repugnant associates in the fake international “modeling” and “pageant” industries in the 70s, 80s, 90s, and 00s, rewarding bureaucrats who helped Epstein coverup — comes to the same conclusion. Not only a participant, it all reads like he was a key point man helping facilitate this global cesspit.

I don't think anyone cares, we all knew he likes younger women, but we voted for him. we didn't care

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who looks at the big picture — Epstein coverup, his comments, sexually suggestive photos with minor daughter, his repugnant associates in the fake international “modeling” and “pageant” industries in the 70s, 80s, 90s, and 00s, rewarding bureaucrats who helped Epstein coverup — comes to the same conclusion. Not only a participant, it all reads like he was a key point man helping facilitate this global cesspit.

The weird thing is that this was all common knowledge in New York and part of the reason Trump could never get acceptance in New York society.

Hence the horror from that slice of society when he became the GOP nominee. I even remember Hilary saying something to the effect of “even if you vote for me, please not Trump”.

Hollywood Access tape was the clue for the rest of the country and I will never understand why it wasn’t disqualifying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump claimed he never wrote a birthday letter to Epstein with a doodle of a female nude. Now he is suing to quash the evidence he claimed doesn't exist.

Make it make sense.

Is there evidence of the photo? Was it printed?