Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/ronfilipkowski.bsky.social/post/3luofxcex5s2x


1. DOJ will announce Maxwell completely exonerated Trump.

2. They will lie and announce they made no deals or promises to her.

3. The deal they made with her will happen at the end of Trump’s term.

If her lawyers are any good they get a deal for now. She doesn't want to spend the next 3.5 years in jail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump admin is being attacked from the inside and they don’t know what to do. If Murdoch turns off the MAGA fox propaganda hose it’s going to be a problem for the admin.

Fox News never reported on Trump's link to Epstein AT ALL. I've been checking.

It's only the independent journalists on the news side of the WSJ that have doggedly reported. NOT the Editorial Board. NOT the opinion columnists.

The person who leaked to the WSJ knew exactly what they were doing. They knew they wouldn't get traction at all from MAGA if they sent the info to NYT/WaPo et al, those liberal rags. The leaker wanted unimpeachable right-wing credentials. Rupert can and has and well continue to lean on his WSJ, but maybe he's getting old. Or maybe he's actually fine with a little Trump conflict. But I think pigs will fly before Fox turns against Trump.

FOX hates Trump. The Dominian case exposed how they all hated him, thought he was a doofus. They didn't turn on him because they didn't want to lose viewers. But if Trump is found to be guilty of this, then Fox/Murdoch can get rid of Trump once and for all.

Billionaires got their tax cuts, businesses HATE losing their workers to ICE and tariffs and Wall Street doesn't like instability.

I thought it too fantastical to think Thiel/JDMusk are shiving Trump, but this could be the case, and it's glorious.

His use is coming to an end for the tech bros, especially with this Epstein disaster. His only job is to keep a tight grip on his followers and he is unable to do that. He is making himself difficult to defend also.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This seems bad

😳
Uh, damning!

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

I'm sorry, this thing just keeps getting funnier and funnier...

Trump ran on releasing the files, knowing full well that he was probably in them! He's known for months that he's definitely in them! Now he has to release them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It isn’t clear how the letter with Trump’s signature was prepared. Inside the outline of the naked woman was a typewritten note styled as an imaginary conversation between Trump and Epstein, written in the third person.

“Voice Over: There must be more to life than having everything,” the note began.

Donald: Yes, there is, but I won’t tell you what it is.

Jeffrey: Nor will I, since I also know what it is.

Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.

Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it.

Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?

Jeffrey: As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.

Trump: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Epstein and Maxwell set him up with his third wife. Just like Maxwell Sr set him up with his first wife. Donald has been intertwined with whatever this international “operation” is for like 50 years.

[Anonymous]

#1 comedian/podcaster in America right now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bondi told Trump is name is in Epstein files

https://www.wsj.com/politics/justice-department-told-trump-name-in-epstein-files-727a8038?mod=hp_lead_pos1

So was Elon in that briefing, or did Kash tell him separately that Trump was in the files? Elon’s bombshell tweet was June 4.

He’s still at it btw

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the judge say No files unless there is a whole new investigation? Is that what is happening?

No, the judge said that for the cases she handled grand jury information always remains secret per Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure with very few exceptions, and “the President wants this” is not an acceptable exception.

Even Pam Bondi had to know about the limitations of Rule 6, so it was a false lead to look like she was doing something.

[Anonymous]

The lesson of Watergate ( and all of the subsequent "gate" scandals) is that it is the coverup that gets you every time. Why are politicians so stupid!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Epstein and Maxwell set him up with his third wife. Just like Maxwell Sr set him up with his first wife. Donald has been intertwined with whatever this international “operation” is for like 50 years.

At this point, I’m convinced Trump and Epstein were equal partners in their pedo operation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/ronfilipkowski.bsky.social/post/3luofxcex5s2x


1. DOJ will announce Maxwell completely exonerated Trump.

2. They will lie and announce they made no deals or promises to her.

3. The deal they made with her will happen at the end of Trump’s term.

If her lawyers are any good they get a deal for now. She doesn't want to spend the next 3.5 years in jail.

Also, would you believe Trump if he pinky promised to do it at the end of the term?

Yah….didnt think you would.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The lesson of Watergate ( and all of the subsequent "gate" scandals) is that it is the coverup that gets you every time. Why are politicians so stupid!?

You don't know about the times that the cover-up didn't get them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The lesson of Watergate ( and all of the subsequent "gate" scandals) is that it is the coverup that gets you every time. Why are politicians so stupid!?

What’s crazy is that right now watergate would barely make the news cycle if it happened today. Nobody would care.