|
Watch the squirming as UN stooge gets caught in a moral quandary. https://rumble.com/v2y3rqm-united-nations-stooge-gets-caught-in-a-moral-quandary.html |
|
Threads about Ukraine mostly off the first page of political topics.
It’s like covid - the world can’t be in an altered state forever, has to return to the equilibrium. This war will either stop or become part of the background (as opposed to the figure as in gestalt). |
Foreign agitprop built on false premises and equivalences. NEXT. |
One could easily turn that around and ask this Chinese agent why China is trying to annex neighboring areas of the Pacific that are not theirs? Nobody invited them. |
|
This ZNPP attack is shaping up to be the most transparent false-flag ever:
First is the claim by Zelensky that Russia placed explosives on top of ZNPP: This is quite the change from the claim that they had mined the basement that they were floating just a week ago. Second is that the US just deployed the nuclear sniffer plane Constant Phoenix to the Black Sea region. Third is that Russia placed all the reactors at ZNPP in cold shut down. Fourth is the curious avoidance of anyone talking about why Russia would suddenly blow a plant they've controlled for 16 months. Right after Ukraine's counter-offensive fizzled out and on the verge of a large NATO summit. My guess is that Ukraine planned to blow the plant once they had some gains in their counter-offensive, and blame panicked/retreating Russians. Now it looks like all they can do is shell the plant, and hope to hit one of the waste storage vessels. They will of course blame Russia for any leak and hope they can rope NATO deeper into the conflict as a result. |
💯 |
Why do neoliberals all have this voice? Ezra Klein, Chris hayes, Matt yglesias, this un guy etc |
Bottom line is that the plant is in Russian control, so if anything happens to it, it's Russia's responsibility. If they are so worried about ZNPP being targeted militarily then maybe they should leave it and leave a wide, demilitarized buffer around it, to keep any risk of conflict from spilling over and affecting it, as they have repeatedly been asked to do, but have repeatedly ignored and refused to do. Reminder: Russia has ZERO legitimate business even being there in the first place. |
Lol keep on believing their counteroffensive "fizzled out" - they are barely even 10% in to it. They are not even seriously focusing on punching through the Russian lines yet, instead they are destroying Russian capacity first. https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-july-4-2023 |
Who cares? Since it was Russia who initiated the invasion, and it's Russia who can withdraw any time they like, Ukraine has carte blanche to do whatver they need to do. |
Exactly. Russia has no right and no proper rationale for being there. If they are truly concerned about a potential catastrophe, they can simply withdraw and return operation and control of the plant to its proper authorities. |
this is from ISW
|
|
If I were Ukraine and had good intel the winds would blow to the east at a good clip and contaminate large portions of Russian cities I would seriously consider blowing it up.
Downside is many animals would/could be killed. So if there were any way to protect the fish and wildlife I would explore it; but if could seriously make lots of Russians sick for years or actually kill them it may be worth it. |
You are a genuinely horrible human being. How much do the Russians pay you? |
Yes, but what then would the bots, paid shills and Fox News-watching Trumpniks (who have a proclivity for authoritarianism anyway) on here impotently cackle about if the actual aggressor, Russia, were to simply…stop invading? Their empty shell of an existence, dunning kruger posts, and glib ignorance would have no outlet. |