Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Sleazy Roy Moore supporters busted in robocall scheme to make it look like WaPo is paying people to accuse Roy Moore. WRONG. BUSTED!

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2017/11/15/call-fake-washington-post-reporter-asks-damaging-info-roy-moore/865981001/

Such DESPERATION from his supporters. Desperation does not excuse their disgusting deceit and lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Sincere questions. Why do you think that Moore and others like him are the saviors of the party? Why are you more interested in taking the party further to the Right when all the evidence points to the fact that the Right Middle is the best long term position for the party to be? Finally, what about Moore convinces you that he can be an effective legislator?

Moore is not a savior of the party, but he represents conservative values and we need more, not less, of that in the republican party. Capitalism and Conservatism wins.

The country has gone too far left so it takes a larger swing to the right to get the country back on the right track.

The GOP establishment has determined that "Middle of the road" is the best long term position" and that kind of stinking-thinking is what put Romney and Jeb Bush on the ballot as candidates: losing, lukewarm, uninspiring candidates who are repugnant to conservatives because they are basically RINOs, and repugnant to Democrats simply because they have an (R) by their name. Luckily, Jeb Bush did not win the republican primary or we would be seeing Hillary Clinton in office today.

What convinces me that Moore could be an effective legislator is that 1) he has the correct conservative lens to filter legislation to get the right laws passed and the wrong laws blocked, such as the transgendered garbage springing up, and 2) he is smart enough to learn the ropes and do what needs to get done. His experience as a judge makes him quite qualified, certainly more than that jackass Obama.ever was.

American Taliban Values

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Right-wing Gateway Pundit is propping up smears and attacks coming from a pro-Moore troll who is posing as a dead Navy SEAL:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/troll-smearing-roy-moores-accuser-stole-dead-seals-identity

Slimy!

Wow they will really stoop to anything. This person would vehemently claim to be pro-Military too, I suppose. Disgusting.

[Anonymous]

^^^^McConnell would want Moore elected because he could blackmail him if the allegations were true

[Anonymous]

Roy Moore's unhinged attorney sent a bizarre, incoherent letter out threatening the media....

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/11/14/roy_moore_s_lawyer_sent_a_apocalypse_of_a_letter_threatening_local_media.html

The ship is sinking, Roy Moore supporters. You guys hitched your wagon to the wrong horse. Roy Moore is radioactively toxic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sincere questions. Why do you think that Moore and others like him are the saviors of the party? Why are you more interested in taking the party further to the Right when all the evidence points to the fact that the Right Middle is the best long term position for the party to be? Finally, what about Moore convinces you that he can be an effective legislator?

Moore is not a savior of the party, but he represents conservative values and we need more, not less, of that in the republican party. Capitalism and Conservatism wins.

The country has gone too far left so it takes a larger swing to the right to get the country back on the right track.

The GOP establishment has determined that "Middle of the road" is the best long term position" and that kind of stinking-thinking is what put Romney and Jeb Bush on the ballot as candidates: losing, lukewarm, uninspiring candidates who are repugnant to conservatives because they are basically RINOs, and repugnant to Democrats simply because they have an (R) by their name. Luckily, Jeb Bush did not win the republican primary or we would be seeing Hillary Clinton in office today.

What convinces me that Moore could be an effective legislator is that 1) he has the correct conservative lens to filter legislation to get the right laws passed and the wrong laws blocked, such as the transgendered garbage springing up, and 2) he is smart enough to learn the ropes and do what needs to get done. His experience as a judge makes him quite qualified, certainly more than that jackass Obama.ever was.

Thanks for answering. I guess I just get a different vibe. As a judge, he openly defied the Constitution, federal and state law - not real Conservative actions. And based on what I have read about him, he is not your typical GOP capitalist (who tend to be more "establishment") in that they do not let moral and religious views constrain their capitalistic bent. So he is an evangelical conservative. Ok. But evidence shows that evangelical legislators do not have the best legislative track record. They tend to propose things that have no way of getting passed and they tend to obstruct mutually compromised legislation. Given that most people want Congress to work together to get things done and have given it a poor approval rating, electing someone who plays into that polarization won't help. And let's be honest, it will tough for him to get anything done for Alabama because his own party will be lined up against him. And establishment GOPs are not worried about voter backlash in Alabama because it always votes GOP. That's why they are being so aggressive with him now. So...Alabamans will elect someone who philosophically agrees with them but who will have no real impact in furthering their interests in the Senate. I may be wrong but that is what I see from here and I am an "establishment GOP"

I have to agree that you are most likely correct in your assessment. There are 2 factions in the Republican party: The McConnells, McCains, and compromising Corkers, and then there are, I guess "Tea Party-esque"? Republicans. If Moore gets elected, he will have to choose a side to work with, and it will be interesting to see who he sides with.

McConnell has many strings he can pull, and many connections to call upon to get what he wants. This is also what makes me think the rape allegations are false: Once Moore was elected, McConnell, in one of the many backrooms, would call Moore into the room and say, "Roy Boy! Guess what some girls I found are saying about your roaming hands 40 years ago? How about you play ball my way or some friends of mine in the media --all hungry dogs who would just love to chomp down on a sexual misconduct bone I throw them, will be broadcasting all across America? Now, as you will soon learn, it is the McConnel Way, or the highway....which you want it Roy Boy?"

Moore has no interest in working with anyone. He’s a theocrat above all who’s being empowered and given a voice by Bannon. The Bilble trumps the Constitution and judges in Royworld.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have known several people that were sexually abused as children/adolescents. If you are one of those people that asks "Why did they wait 40 years" please take the time to talk with survivors of sexual abuse. It destroyed the victims to varying degrees and all have had ongoing problems. Many never discuss it. I was raped 34 years ago and will never discuss it.

I'm sorry.
That's exactly how rapists are free to continue raping. Perhaps if his victim before you had found the strength to report, he would not have been free to continue raping his victims.

Your thoughts?

No. It's defense attorneys putting the women on trial. It's police failing to process rape kits. It's DAs letting rapists make a deal for a light sentence that avoids being branded a sex criminal and forced to register. It's juries failing to convict because the woman knew the man, was drinking, was wearing a short skirt, had a history of promiscuity, or was not Mother Theresa.

Those are the reasons rapists are free to continue raping.

[Anonymous]

Bernie Bernstein? Come on, that's not even trying!

Can they trace the call?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Sincere questions. Why do you think that Moore and others like him are the saviors of the party? Why are you more interested in taking the party further to the Right when all the evidence points to the fact that the Right Middle is the best long term position for the party to be? Finally, what about Moore convinces you that he can be an effective legislator?

Moore is not a savior of the party, but he represents conservative values and we need more, not less, of that in the republican party. Capitalism and Conservatism wins.

The country has gone too far left so it takes a larger swing to the right to get the country back on the right track.

The GOP establishment has determined that "Middle of the road" is the best long term position" and that kind of stinking-thinking is what put Romney and Jeb Bush on the ballot as candidates: losing, lukewarm, uninspiring candidates who are repugnant to conservatives because they are basically RINOs, and repugnant to Democrats simply because they have an (R) by their name. Luckily, Jeb Bush did not win the republican primary or we would be seeing Hillary Clinton in office today.

What convinces me that Moore could be an effective legislator is that 1) he has the correct conservative lens to filter legislation to get the right laws passed and the wrong laws blocked, such as the transgendered garbage springing up, and 2) he is smart enough to learn the ropes and do what needs to get done. His experience as a judge makes him quite qualified, certainly more than that jackass Obama.ever was.

The conservative values of pedophilia?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Sincere questions. Why do you think that Moore and others like him are the saviors of the party? Why are you more interested in taking the party further to the Right when all the evidence points to the fact that the Right Middle is the best long term position for the party to be? Finally, what about Moore convinces you that he can be an effective legislator?

Moore is not a savior of the party, but he represents conservative values and we need more, not less, of that in the republican party. Capitalism and Conservatism wins.

The country has gone too far left so it takes a larger swing to the right to get the country back on the right track.

The GOP establishment has determined that "Middle of the road" is the best long term position" and that kind of stinking-thinking is what put Romney and Jeb Bush on the ballot as candidates: losing, lukewarm, uninspiring candidates who are repugnant to conservatives because they are basically RINOs, and repugnant to Democrats simply because they have an (R) by their name. Luckily, Jeb Bush did not win the republican primary or we would be seeing Hillary Clinton in office today.

What convinces me that Moore could be an effective legislator is that 1) he has the correct conservative lens to filter legislation to get the right laws passed and the wrong laws blocked, such as the transgendered garbage springing up, and 2) he is smart enough to learn the ropes and do what needs to get done. His experience as a judge makes him quite qualified, certainly more than that jackass Obama.ever was.

The conservative values of pedophilia?

All this tells me is that these conservatives are fine with pedophilia if it means going back to "conservative" values. Isn't think kind of like the Germans who were "fine" with Hitler killing Jews as long as he made Germany great again?

Would that ^PP be fine with a 30 some year old man going after his 14 year old daughter as long as this man brings back conservative values? So, you would be willing to sell out your daughter for what? How are you different from the Taliban?

[Anonymous]

NRSC polling shows Jones up 12 points on Moore.

No wonder Hannity started to pull back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NRSC polling shows Jones up 12 points on Moore.

No wonder Hannity started to pull back.

I'd like to be optimistic, but that seems like an outlier and Nate Silver says to have a wary eye to it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NRSC polling shows Jones up 12 points on Moore.

No wonder Hannity started to pull back.

Hannity is pulling back because they want to get Sessions in the seat. Gets him out of hot water in DC and lets them get someone in the AG office who will dump Mueller and protect Trump. Nothing to do with Moore at this point, it's just convenient.

[Anonymous]

Quit saying these people support pedophilia. They don't. They believe that Roy Moore did not do what these two women said he did.

I must admit that I just heard one of his high school classmates speak and she said she did not believe the accusations. She said she had never heard any of this and she lives in the town.

I do believe he dated teen-aged girls. I find that troubling--but it is not pedophilia.

There are two women who have accused him, and, while I find them believable, I am not 100% convinced. I do not like Moore and I would not vote for him, but I just don't understand how this could have been kept quiet for so long. Unlike Weinstein, he had no power over these girls for forty years. Yes, at the time, it would have been difficult for them to challenge him, but for forty years?

People in his home town still support him. The media says that it was well known in that town that he liked teenaged girls.. That does not make sense. If it were well known, they would not support him.

No endorsement of Moore. Just questioning the circumstances. There are some pieces missing in this story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Quit saying these people support pedophilia. They don't. They believe that Roy Moore did not do what these two women said he did.

I must admit that I just heard one of his high school classmates speak and she said she did not believe the accusations. She said she had never heard any of this and she lives in the town.

I do believe he dated teen-aged girls. I find that troubling--but it is not pedophilia.

There are two women who have accused him, and, while I find them believable, I am not 100% convinced. I do not like Moore and I would not vote for him, but I just don't understand how this could have been kept quiet for so long. Unlike Weinstein, he had no power over these girls for forty years. Yes, at the time, it would have been difficult for them to challenge him, but for forty years?

People in his home town still support him. The media says that it was well known in that town that he liked teenaged girls.. That does not make sense. If it were well known, they would not support him.

No endorsement of Moore. Just questioning the circumstances. There are some pieces missing in this story.

He was the District Attorney. Of course he had power over them to not report at the time or anytime there after. You clearly have no concept of the good ol boy network.