Trump campaign death spiral

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twitter is working well with a 75% cut in staff. That's a fact.

Sorry democrats.

Not very well.

+1. I was on it for Legal Twitter. A nice list of smart people with interesting takes on things like Con Law. By which I mean, interesting to me. 99% of people wouldn’t make it through the posts without falling asleep. Even that was so overrun with bots, RWNJs, porn, trolls, etc., etc. that it became unusable and I deleted my account. It still exists, but in any useful form. I mean— is FFX Underground still around? If you want bots, RWNJs trolls and porn, you can just go there. And not have Elon Musk holding and selling your information.

Does anyone besides RWNJs and trolls even use Twitter anymore?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twitter is working well with a 75% cut in staff. That's a fact.

Sorry democrats.

Not very well.

+1. I was on it for Legal Twitter. A nice list of smart people with interesting takes on things like Con Law. By which I mean, interesting to me. 99% of people wouldn’t make it through the posts without falling asleep. Even that was so overrun with bots, RWNJs, porn, trolls, etc., etc. that it became unusable and I deleted my account. It still exists, but in any useful form. I mean— is FFX Underground still around? If you want bots, RWNJs trolls and porn, you can just go there. And not have Elon Musk holding and selling your information.

Does anyone besides RWNJs and trolls even use Twitter anymore?

The thing that keeps twitter going is the “followers”. Content creators are hesitant to leave but the platform is easily manipulated. It’s become a RWNJ and their scammers platform. It is dying a slow death.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

That’s just weird. How embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Twitter is working well with a 75% cut in staff. That's a fact.

Sorry democrats.

That may be so. But you can’t say you believe in American job creation and applaud firing people with no notice. That doesn’t lead to stability.

Sure I can. You want job creation of useless positions. That simply inflates the end cost to the customer. It is not efficient. In a global economy, efficiency is paramount, regardless of industry.

Bad news for employment numbers also because when you break out where the new jobs are coming from, it's 50% or more government and health care. Most of those new health care jobs are bureaucracy. They do nothing to make the end product in health care better. Just paper pushing. Most of the new government jobs are for social services.

So, as a country, we aren't really moving forward. We're just spinning in place and redistributing income while other countries are moving forward and raising their standard of living. Our number one priority seems to be equity for those who don't produce and don't even try.

Most of the healthcare jobs are people staffing senior homes for the baby boomers.
Most of the government jobs are new teachers.

Cite for you assertion that it is all bureaucrats?

No, it's mostly health care for 12 million poverty stricken illegal aliens you just invited in.

They heard that America will help their ill child, for free.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Who is that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who is that?

Barron maybe? Except I thought he always has to wear a tie.

[Anonymous]

Yes, Trump is very popular with certain people in certain areas.

What is your bizarre fetish about crowd size? Is this all about setting up an overturn of the election if he loses? How pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Trump could not handle Harris baiting him about crowd size in the debate. Melted into a tantrum in front of us all.

She manipulated him so so easily. And that was at a forum where it was easy to know what was coming and he fully prepared.

Watch it again. He is unfit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who is that?

It looks like Elon Musk, who was supposed to attend the rally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Trump is very popular with certain people in certain areas.

What is your bizarre fetish about crowd size? Is this all about setting up an overturn of the election if he loses? How pathetic.

It’s dick measuring. That’s all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Trump is very popular with certain people in certain areas.

What is your bizarre fetish about crowd size? Is this all about setting up an overturn of the election if he loses? How pathetic.

It’s dick measuring. That’s all.

So he loses his “crowd” prematurely? 😬

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Impressive— especially in light of the recent assassination attempts!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Trump is very popular with certain people in certain areas.

What is your bizarre fetish about crowd size? Is this all about setting up an overturn of the election if he loses? How pathetic.

That crowd suggests there are a lot of enthusiastic Trump voters in Pennsylvania. Will be interesting to see PA's election results

[Anonymous]

It's a lot of people, but the MAGAs are trying to claim it is over 100,000 to boost Trump's little ego.

It was no where close to that amount, because you can look at the bleacher behind the dias, and interpolate based on size how many people are on it, and then replliate that measurement across the crowd in the aerial. But hey, if it makes him feel good then so be it. He is preaching to the choir at this point. He isn't getting new voters and he is turning off people on the fence.