Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 3

[Anonymous]

Leland Keyser can be problematic for this whole thing, if she sheds some light on why this story got concocted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Diane Feinstein apparently got the Holton Arms alumni list, to email everyone asking if they have anything that might be helpful.

Is this even Kosher? -SP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am chuckling at the folks who are defending Kavanaugh. It is clear to me that most of you don’t know him and don’t have experience with this social circle. If you did, not so sure you would spend so much time defending him and the culture.

He sounds lovely at work: https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/i-knew-brett-kavanaugh-during-his-years-republican-operative-don-ncna907391

Look into Brock’s suits against his former partner if you want to see a “lovely” person.

Can you explain what this refers to?

When Brock and his partner broke up, he sued him over (ironically) a Delaware beach house. Maybe Brock or his partner is one of Ford’s Delaware beach friends who advised her what to do in August

I think she was at the beach in California. It was clear from the ideas that were given to her that none of them were people remotely connected to politics in anyway. They were trying to be helpful but it was not their area of expertise at all. Also clear none of them were lawyers either.

In Ford’s testimony, she referred to asking friends in Delaware for references to lawyers. She mentioned calling lawyers from the Walgreen’s parking lot in Rehoboth to discuss her case. She came to Rehoboth annually to visit her parents so she could have acquaintances who are typical Washington lawyers.

She FLEW to Rehoboth annually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Leland Keyser can be problematic for this whole thing, if she sheds some light on why this story got concocted.

She has said she believes Dr. Ford.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leland Keyser can be problematic for this whole thing, if she sheds some light on why this story got concocted.

She has said she believes Dr. Ford.

Dr. Ford said Laland was a witness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leland Keyser can be problematic for this whole thing, if she sheds some light on why this story got concocted.

She has said she believes Dr. Ford.

And, she also says she never met Brett Kavanaugh--and does not remember the party. She doesn't want to call her lifelong friend a liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

OMG. I guess you have never known any teenage boys. They exaggerate, brag and dissemble about this kind of stuff all the time. Are you taking all this literally???

These were teen kids who pretended to act tough, talk tough but I would be extremely surprised if any of them actually did any of these things. Not sure how he "lied" about it.

I am not pro Kavanaugh or pro his accusers, just trying to use a little common sense. I agree with whoever said this is like the Salem witch trials.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diane Feinstein apparently got the Holton Arms alumni list, to email everyone asking if they have anything that might be helpful.

Is this even Kosher? -SP

Kosher?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leland Keyser can be problematic for this whole thing, if she sheds some light on why this story got concocted.

She has said she believes Dr. Ford.

Pat pat pat - I believe you. Now leave me the f alone

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1) I don't recall Kavanaugh ever saying he did not get drunk back then. I heard him say he was never blackout drunk, i.e. so drunk that he had no recollection of events. That's important because the Dem Senators were trying very hard to establish this to use it to say that he didn't remember assaulting Ford.

2) It's a matter of time before someone steps forward with Ford's yearbook - the fact that her social media was scrubbed clean suggests intent to hide background information.

3) Ford flew multiple times for pleasure, as far as Polynesia. You can make any excuse you want for why, but the FACT is she said she was afraid to fly to come out to the DC area. Furthermore, she also stated she flew out yearly to go to DE with her family.

4) The prosecutor who interviewed her said that she would not prosecute Kavanaugh based on Ford's testimony.

Anyone going to respond to these?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

OMG. I guess you have never known any teenage boys. They exaggerate, brag and dissemble about this kind of stuff all the time. Are you taking all this literally???

These were teen kids who pretended to act tough, talk tough but I would be extremely surprised if any of them actually did any of these things. Not sure how he "lied" about it.

I am not pro Kavanaugh or pro his accusers, just trying to use a little common sense. I agree with whoever said this is like the Salem witch trials.

This.

And I could totally see them making up alternative meanings to these words that were code for something they would actually experience. The boys in my junior high did exactly this when they learned what 69 meant. Doesn't mean they were getting any, not by a long shot.

[Anonymous]

It is so interesting that DCUM posters usually sneer at anyone who uses the "Dr." title who is not a medical doctor. Yet Ms. Ford's supporters refer to her as Dr. Ford constantly. Why is this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Leland Keyser can be problematic for this whole thing, if she sheds some light on why this story got concocted.

She has said she believes Dr. Ford.

And, she also says she never met Brett Kavanaugh--and does not remember the party. She doesn't want to call her lifelong friend a liar.

No, you have to not listen when Kavanaugh speaks at the hearing. He lied about this, over and over and over. You should watch the Rachel Maddow episode that aired that night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You people need to put down the Kool aid. Are you willfully stupid or outright crazy? Or just a garden variety troll? As soon as you start talking about "liberals" as though they are a monolith, you lose all credibility. There are crazy posts on these Kavanaugh threads, to be sure, but so is yours. You "know" he's innocent. There are a limited set of people who "know" that, and you ain't one of em.

LOL! Kool aid? Go watch the opening of the first hearing on Kavanaugh. Almost choreographed and staged. Ridiculous, unprofessional performance by Dems.

Then, go listen to Feinstein the afternoon of K's last hearing--all the attacks. All the stupid questions about high school yearbooks. Personal attacks. Kavanaugh has had years on the bench and yet high school is the best they have? And, the assault accusations. Look at how Ford was handled by her lawyers--either she is lying or they deceived her.

No. It's not Kool Aid. The spiked punch came from Feinstein, et.al--not Kavanaugh.

And then watch this and try to convince me that this guy is owed a Supreme Court seat.

Not sure if I’m missing something, but that seems pretty uneventful.

Well, I guess you missed all the LIES the guy who wants to be on the SCOTUS said. Boofing means using drugs/alcohol anally, Devil’s Triangle is a threesome, Kav refused to admit that ralphing referred to puking when drunk, etc.
Review the tape and you’ll find more. Oh, and he claimed the ralphing had to do with his “weak stomach.”

All these stupid small lies were completely unnecessary. He could have said the things in his yearbook were sensational exaggerations typical of a teenager, and that he’sd put them in for the benefit of his friends because he wanted to look cool. Instead, he lied, which is far more suspicious. If he’s lying about small things, he’s surely lying about big things.

OMG. I guess you have never known any teenage boys. They exaggerate, brag and dissemble about this kind of stuff all the time. Are you taking all this literally???

These were teen kids who pretended to act tough, talk tough but I would be extremely surprised if any of them actually did any of these things. Not sure how he "lied" about it.

I am not pro Kavanaugh or pro his accusers, just trying to use a little common sense. I agree with whoever said this is like the Salem witch trials.

Ok, we are with you. Some teen boys might exaggerate to their friends to seem cool. BK did not testify as such. He lied NOW about the meanings of the terms. He’s saying they meant different things than you think, and he’s saying he did those things. That’s totally different and he’s lying! Therein lies the rub. If he had said from the beginning I just put that stuff on my page to seem cool to friends like Mark Judge, he may have a leg to stand on. He has a major perjury and credibility problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

But in May 2006, as Republicans hoped to finally push Kavanaugh’s nomination across the finish line, the ABA downgraded its endorsement.

The group’s judicial investigator had recently interviewed dozens of lawyers, judges and others who had worked with Kavanaugh, the ABA announced at the time, and some of them raised red flags about “his professional experience and the question of his freedom from bias and open-mindedness.”

“One interviewee remained concerned about the nominee’s ability to be balanced and fair should he assume a federal judgeship,” the ABA committee chairman wrote to senators in 2006. “Another interviewee echoed essentially the same thoughts: ‘(He is) immovable and very stubborn and frustrating to deal with on some issues.’”

A particular judge had told the ABA that Kavanaugh had been “sanctimonious” during an oral argument in court. Several lawyers considered him inexperienced, and one said he “dissembled” in the courtroom.

This.
This.
This.

That sneering entitled performance on Thursday was very much in line with this description. He refused to answer simple questions directly. The snarling nastiness to Sen. Klobuchar alone should disqualify him. He might make a great hard right politician, but he does NOT belong on the Supreme Court.

We need a reasonable SCOTUS process: 60 vote requirement. Term limits of 25 years or age 80, whichever is first
. Mandatory Senate vote on a nominee within 90 days of presidential nomination. (i.e., no future Merrick Garland scenarios).

He has already been a judge for many years. The above was a prediction of how he would act as a federal judge. Based on his 12 year record, how has that prediction held up? If he were a democrat, you would have called him “passionate.” SMH.

No, I would have been embarrassed if he had been a Democrat.